Blade server myths debunked

A recent study says that first-generation, high-density, low-power blade computers, while ultradense, don't yield the performance or inexpensive deployment expected of them.

Competitive Systems Analysis, a systems benchmark testing and design firm in Danville, Calif., tested blades from RLX Technologies and Hewlett-Packard (formerly Compaq).

They found that the RLX System 300ex and HP ProLiant BL10e blades, which are based on a low-voltage Intel Pentium III chipset, don't perform well in tests against 1U (1.75-inch) rack-mount servers, such as the HP ProLiant DL360. The study also found that the ultradense blades are relatively expensive to deploy when compared to the cost of implementing standard, high-volume Intel servers.

Saving rack space may not be an equal trade-off for poor performance and high deployment costs.

However, CSA says that blade servers may be an excellent application for InfiniBand, a next-generation I/O transport and interconnect. When vendors such as Dell adopt InfiniBand instead of 10/100M bit/sec Ethernet as the backplane to interconnect their blades, CSA says it will be the death of the standard high-volume server promoted by Intel.

The tests were performed using a Windows 2000-based transaction throughput and scalability tool called Benchmark Studio. CSA found that it takes three blades to equal the performance on one HP ProLiant DL360 with dual Pentium III 1.4-GHz CPUs. The RLX and HP blades run at 800 MHz and 700 MHz, respectively. They each have a single processor and 10/100 M-bit/sec Ethernet adapters.

Further, the study showed that it will cost about US$41,000 to populate a 3U (5.25-inch) chassis with blades. If you assume that it takes three blades to equal one 1U ProLiant, you can purchase an equivalent number of 1U ProLiants for US$24,000. And the net space savings using the ultradense blades is only 50 per cent per rack.

CSA recommends that first-generation, low-voltage, high-density blades should be reserved for Web hosting or application service providers, and not for general application use in typical three-tier Internet infrastructures.

The company advises customers with those needs to wait for second-generation blades from Dell, IBM, HP and RLX.

Dell and IBM will be shipping later this year. HP and RLX have said they will ship second-generation blades before year-end.

For a copy of the report, visit: http://www.xpnet.com

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

More about CompaqE*TradeHewlett-Packard AustraliaIBM AustraliaIntelRLXRLX TechnologiesSEC

Show Comments