Google late last week claimed results of in-house data sorting tests bolster its claims that its MapReduce technology can manipulate more data faster than any conventional database.
According to a Friday afternoon blog post by Grzegorz Czajkowski, a member of Google's systems infrastructure team, MapReduce recently sorted 1 terabyte (TB) of data in 68 seconds, or about a third of the time Yahoo! achieved this year.
Sorting, or rearranging, data is one of the most basic functions of a spreadsheet, database or other data manipulation software.
Google used 1,000 servers running MapReduce in parallel to sort the data, versus 910 for Yahoo, according to Czajowksi.
Google also tested MapReduce's ability to sort 1 petabyte (PB), or 1,000 TB, of data. That is equivalent to 12 times the amount of archived Web data in the US Library of Congress as of May 2008, according to Google.
Using 4,000 servers, which is likely a small fraction of Google's entire worldwide server infrastructure, MapReduce took 6 hours and two minutes to sort 1 PB, according to Czajkowski.
"We're not aware of any other sorting experiment at this scale and are obviously very excited to be able to process so much data so quickly," he wrote.
Czajkowski did not say when the tests were done. He did reveal that as of early January this year, Google was processing an average of 20 PB total per day.
By comparison the largest publicly-known data warehouses today store several petabytes of data total, only processing a tiny fraction of that amount each day.
Google's announcement appeared to be deliberately timed to coincide with a speech by a noted database expert and MapReduce critic, David DeWitt.
A former longtime University of Wisconsin-Madison computer science professor, DeWitt joined Microsoft this spring to run a new research lab being created on the Madison campus.
The lab will focus on helping Microsoft's SQL Server "scale out" in order to run on hundreds or thousands of servers at a time. That will allow customers to run parallel database clusters similar technically to Google's, though nowhere near the latter's scale.