Beyond batteries: Long-lasting fuel cells are the future

Unlimited, lightweight and cheap mobile power is on the horizon

Besides improving technology, another factor that should spur adoption of fuel cells is the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Today, fuel cells and methanol are big no-nos on planes, but that will change in October, when the FAA will start allowing travelers to bring fuel cells on board airliners along with two refills of methanol.

"You may not be able to bring your nail clipper on the plane," quips MTI's Lim, "but a fuel cell will be OK. This will be a big spur to the commercialization of fuel cell technology."

Because fuel cells will soon be able to go anywhere you go, sales are forecast to grow quickly. Frost & Sullivan's Bradford thinks that by 2012, 80 million micro fuel cells will be sold to power notebooks, mobile phones, media players and other portable devices. That's up from 1 million fuel cells shipped in 2007 and a projected 25 million fuel cells in 2010.

On the downside

While fuel cells are about ready to go, a few shortcomings remain.

"Fuel cells are great for providing constant power," adds MTI's Lim. "But they can't handle the peak power demand that's required by most electronic devices."

For example, when a mobile phone starts playing a streaming video, its power draw can rise from 2 watts to 5 watts in less than a second, overwhelming a fuel cell's output. As a result, the first generation of practical fuel cells will be hybrid designs that have a small lithium bridge battery to provide extra power for such situations.

When the bridge battery is out of juice, it will be recharged by the fuel cell, a process that will take time. During that time, performance of the device could be degraded.

One long-term solution to this problem is replacing the add-on battery with a capacitor that stores enough power to augment the fuel cell. In the shorter term, Sony recently showed a prototype hybrid fuel cell with a small lithium-ion battery. The fuel cell delivers a steady 3 watts of power, which is what a typical smart phone requires, with the battery filling in on an as-needed basis.

The package measures 1.2 by 2 in., or about the size of a cell-phone battery. It powered a handset displaying digital broadcast TV for 14 hours nonstop. Its fuel: one-third of an ounce of methanol.

Another problem, at least in the short term, is price: Fuel cells will cost more than traditional batteries at first. "They'll be more expensive compared to lithium batteries, but we expect that to change quickly," says MTI's Lim.

One reason prices are expected to drop is that fuel cells have require fewer parts than batteries, and those parts are easier to manufacture. And, of course, technology prices usually decrease as adoption increases. Lithium batteries, which first started being widely used about 13 years ago, are a perfect example of this trend.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

More about ClipperConsumer ElectronicsFAAFederal Aviation AdministrationFrost & Sullivan (Aust)SonySystems GroupToshiba

Show Comments