Google officials fielded questions from developers at the O'Reilly Web 2.0 Expo in San Francisco who pressed the company about its Google App Engine, asking about everything from its language support, privacy assurances, pricing and backward compatibility.
To much fanfare, Google released a preview version of its App Engine earlier this month that it said allows developers to develop and write their Web applications using Google's infrastructure. The App Engine includes dynamic Web serving, persistent storage, automatic scaling and load balancing, Google APIs for authenticating users and sending e-mail -- and a full-featured local development environment, Google said.
Asked about backwards compatibility for developers who opt to run a Web application in the App Engine, Kevin Gibbs, technical lead for the project, said that Google will support multiple versions of the APIs the company provides.
"We're committed to not breaking that API we're providing to you," he said. "We have that ability to create new versions of our APIs, and you can actually say which one you want to use."
Addressing another concern, Gibbs added that Google does not want to lock people into its App Engine, saying that doing so is not good for the Web and "when the Web is doing well, Google is doing well." And he acknowledged that the company "needs better tools to get that data back out if you decide that you want to move that app, [so] you can dump that data out in a consistent way."
Developers at the presentation pressed Gibbs on when the project would include support for languages like PHP and Ruby. The runtime now supports only Python.
"I don't have those sort of dates available," he said. "We are very, very interested in supporting different languages. This is a preview release. We're trying to get it out there so you can tell us what you like and don't like."
Paul McDonald, Google App Engine product manager, declined to offer specifics when asked about the future pricing for the offering, which is free for up to five million page views a month in its current version. But he did say that users will only pay based on the CPU and bandwidth quota they use. They will not be required to sign contracts.
"Those rates will be competitive to existing rates out there."