Concerns about Pivotal ad

Concern about ad

I enjoy reading Computerworld, usually while in my office eating a quick lunch, and was taking time today to catch up on a few back issues.

I am motivated to e-mail you for the first time after seeing the Pivotal advertisement on page 23 of the April 19 issue.

We are all exposed by the news media to a daily diet of war death and mutilation, destruction, starvation and poverty around the world.

But the Pivotal Corporation appears to have reached a new low in advertising with its photo of an amputee. It simply reeks of extreme bad taste.

I am surprised that it was published.

Pamela Campbell
Manager information services
City of Gosnells WA

More on advertising

I wanted to add my name to what I'm sure is a growing list of people who thought the Pivotal Corporation advertisement (CW April 19 2004, p23) was in very poor taste (or disgraceful to put it bluntly). It is a shame Computerworld even accepted it for publishing.

It would have been better for your company to print a full page apology to readers if it was seriously worried about offending readers rather than trying to justify its use (Letter, CW May 3 2004, p18).

We as management/IT professionals have seen enough marketing messages without needing them explained to us – without using shock tactics to sell its products/services.

Brand recognition doesn't translate to sales.

Rob Phillips
Melbourne

Pivotal Corp responded to similar criticism in CW May 3, saying the ad, with the photo, from a reputable image bank, was designed to portray adaptability; the company apologized for any offence the ad caused. – Ed

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

More about Pivotal

Show Comments