E-commerce? E-business? Who E-cares?

Anyone who has finished implementing electronic commerce on the Internet, please step forward. You can now move on to electronic business.

Not so fast, please.

In a nasty little intramural squabble, some analysts and online businesspeople have decided that E-business is infinitely superior as a moniker to E-commerce.

That's misleading and distracts us from the business goals at hand. The effort to separate the E-commerce and E-business concepts appears to have been driven by marketing motives and is dreadfully thin in substance.

Yes, E-commerce already was misused, abused and confused when E-business emerged in 1996 as the new buzzword. But the genesis of that confusion rests with the particular scope and vision one has for E-commerce.

People have been saying "business-to-business electronic commerce" since 1994 - the year the Internet turned upside down the old meaning of E-commerce. And when you look at those early broad definitions, it's very difficult indeed to see how they differ from the ones given today for E-business.

Here's the important thing: E-commerce, E-business or whatever else you may want to call it is a means to an end. The objectives, as with IT, are to improve or exploit unique business propositions - with the focus now being the online world. Worrying about the definitions of those words, or about which is superior to the other, or about which is a subset of the other, is a silly little inside-the-beltway argument.

Consider the following fundamental reexaminations: customer satisfaction becomes online customer satisfaction; competitiveness is now online competitiveness; customer loyalty turns into electronic loyalty; revenue translates into online revenue; cost of business is influenced by running the online business; gaining new customers evolves into acquiring new electronic customers; and developing new products changes to information-based products.

That list isn't dependent on how we define E-commerce or E-business - but it's guaranteed to keep any organization busy for the next two to three years.

We are witnessing increased E-commerce or E-business activity inside our companies, and it's manifested by substantial changes to the buying/selling process, relentless efforts to create digital value services and an obsession with intermediary-like business functionality. Those activities are leading to the creation of new types of electronic marketplaces.

So guess what? We need another "E" word. That's right, electronic markets.

E-markets are becoming not only the new battlegrounds for market-share dominance, but also the new locus for business activity. The opening of and participation and competition in various forms of open E-markets ultimately are the primary goal of E-commerce or E-business, and that goes beyond trying to define either one of them.

The next generation of E-markets will be open, global and based on E-business rules of engagement and interoperation. They include private E-business communities, open digital cooperatives, powerful market makers, electronic trading exchanges and agent-based marketplaces.

Now do you see E-business or E-commerce? Or, rather, do you see several different choices for participation in E-markets?

Attempting to define E-commerce or E-business is guaranteed to generate byzantine debates with meaningless origins. It reminds me of trying to answer the following question: "If one synchronized swimmer drowns, would the others follow?"

Instead, let the question be: "What E-markets are we participating in?"

Mougayar (walid@cyberm.com) is a management consultant, a lecturer on E-market strategies and author of Opening Digital Markets.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

More about Walid

Show Comments