Like many people, I "own" a few personal domains for my blogs and a few old business ideas that never got off the ground. And, like many people, they have been parked at Yahoo Small Business, partially because I already had a Yahoo account when I registered them a few years ago, and partially because I was lured by the US$1.99/year offers for new domains that they had running at the time. The rate increased to $9.95 after the first year, but I was OK with that. I was able to reserve the domains and set up redirects to my blogs, and have the option of building real sites if I ever get too frustrated with Google's Blogger service.
Now I find out in an email from Yahoo that the annual domain "renewal price" has increased by 30%, to $12.95 year.
Mind you, this isn't for new domains. It's only for existing ones, owned by loyal customers like me. If you look on the Yahoo Small Business site, there isn't any mention of the price being jacked up by 30%, and why should this be listed? That would only scare people away!
There was no explanation for the increase in the email I received or on the company website, so let's examine some possible reasons.
It's certainly not because it takes more work to renew the domains or send out the email notifications. Like eBay and other large Internet companies, Yahoo automates many of its services, and keeps customer service staff to a bare minimum
What are some other potential reasons? Consider the effective date of the price increase: March 11, 2008. As you may recall, this was when the company was in a tight spot. It was just one month after Yahoo announced a "lavish" employee retention and severance program in the wake of Microsoft's bid for the company, and about six weeks before it attempted to justify various salary increases and bonuses for senior executives, including President Sue Decker's $1.1 million bonus for 2007.
But I don't think these added costs are the direct reasons for the domain price increase. A primary source of Yahoo's profit is advertising, and while revenue increased in the first quarter, the company said it experienced weakness in sectors such as finance, travel and retail. If this weakness persists throughout the year -- a possible scenario, considering all of the negative economic news we've been hearing, and the rapid increase in online advertising inventory from social networks and other sites -- Yahoo will have to depend more on non-advertising income. I don't know if the new pricing scheme will really boost Yahoo's bottom line, but pissing off its domain customers is a small price to pay to help offset any dip in advertising.
Computerworld Member Login
Prioritizing Services with IT Service Management (ITSM)
Computerworld Live Webinar
Wednesday 20th, August 2008
11:00am EST (Sydney, Australia)
To be repeated on:
Thursday 4th, September 2008
11:00am EST (Sydney Australia)
Sign up and receive a free copy of The Forrester WaveTM Service Desk Management Tools, Q2 2008 at the conclusion of the Webinar.
Attend and discover:
- How to deliver value to your business through ITSM
- Best practice ITSM implementation
- Why emphasis is changing from optimizing IT management processes to better servicing customers and demonstrating real dollar value
- If service-oriented ITSM is best for your business
- +
Computerworld Live Podcast #97: The Future of Enterprise Networking 25/07/2008 09:45:36
This week CW Live chats with Mark Thompson, global sales and marketing manager for HP ProCurve, on the future of the enterprise networking. Mark discusses the trends we can expect to see in the near future and how the right infrastructure can ensure your enterprise network is secure. - +
Computerworld Live Podcast #96: Security at the Edge 11/06/2008 09:22:22
CW Live speaks with Amol Mitra, HP ProCurve Director of Marketing for Asia Pacific and Japan. Today's topic: how enterprises are starting to shift away from simply controlling security via server logins, firewalls and moving to more adaptive security frameworks. - +
Data Management Edition #10: Multi-Petascale Systems 02/05/2008 09:12:33
This week we look at sustainability and the development of multicore technologies to build multi-petascale systems. - +
IT Security Edition #11: How to poison the Storm botnet 01/05/2008 08:51:55
This week CW Live presents a case study on how to poison the notorious Storm botnet . Plus we take a look at Cisco's plans for Ironport. - +
IT Security Edition #10: Cyber-battles fought and won 24/04/2008 11:09:47
Vendors bow to end user pressure to improve product security, and we take a look at the latest concepts shaping the cyber-battlefield of the future.
Viva la Verticals! Key to Vendor Growth is Through Vertical Market Opportunities, Says IDC 2008-09-05 11:05:00+10
F-Secure delivers fastest protection in the online world 2008-09-04 16:50:00+10
NETGEAR expands ProSafe team as business-class products take off in SME market 2008-09-04 16:27:00+10
Rogue security apps dominate Fortinet's Aug 2008 IT threat report 2008-09-04 16:00:00+10
Adaptec Intelligent Power Management Reduces Storage Power Consumption Up to 70 Percent 2008-09-04 11:28:00+10
Microsoft 2008 Mission Critical IT
To help you deploy the new Microsoft '08 technologies into your mission-critical environments, EMC and Microsoft have developed and validated a number of reference architectures. Discover the benefits of leveraging these skills.










Comments
$12.95? - I've been notified its going up to $34.95!
So exactly the same...
they hooked me in at 1.99 which - OK was never going to last, and then increased to 9.95 - of course this had to happen.
And even to 12.95 I suppose.
But then $34.95?
What ever has possessed some bright spark to figure it would be a good idea to screw it all the way to $34.95 is beyond my conception. Its madness.
Personally I can only view it as a "2 fingered salute" from Yahoo! and have assumed they are using it as a means of saying sod off we dont want your business anymore, because nobody in their right mind is going to stay and pay those rates.
Anybody like to offer opinion as to the best place to transfer 40 + domains to?
g.