Monday | 13 October, 2008
Computerworld
Google board opposes Net censorship ban, human rights review
Shareholders to propose votes on both issues at May 8 annual meeting
Linda Rosencrance 27/03/2008 10:35:20

Additional Resources
Executive Guides
Whitepapers
Zones
Zone logoZones provide focussed content from Computerworld and leading technology partners.

Newsletter Subscription

Sign up for our Computerworld newsletters!
Computerworld's twice-daily news service keeps you in touch with the latest, most important headlines from Australia and around the world.
Keep up with the latest virtualisation technologies, products, news and features.
RSS Feeds

The second proposal would require Google to create a committee to review the company's human rights policies. That proposal was put forward by Harrington Investments, a firm that focuses on socially responsible investing.

"We're not surprised [by the board's position], but I wouldn't say we're dismayed either," said Harrington spokesman, Jack Ucciferri. "It's a corporate governance mechanism that I think that today's board of directors and corporate governance experts would be reluctant to implement because it ties fiduciary responsibility of the board directly to how the company deals with human rights."

Ucciferri added that his company's proposal was the first step in a multi-year process to introduce policy change at Google, and that his company was talking with Google about its responsibility in the area of human rights.

"We're hoping they're going to respond favorably and they are open to this idea but at this point they have opposed it," he said.

Ucciferri said his company is hoping that over time Google's board will come to understand that forming a human rights committee would be a corporate governance asset because it would be a mechanism for identifying potential issues earlier, and would allows the company to act before there has been damage to the company's reputation.

In a statement on its Web site, the firm said that companies such Yahoo, Google and others "have been working to restrict access and filter information on the Internet, as well as identify Internet users, including bloggers who advocate democracy, leading to their arrest, imprisonment and often torture.

Google was criticized for launching a search service in 2006 aimed at Chinese users that blocks results considered objectionable to the Beijing government. The company said it struggled over the decision but concluded it was better to provide some Internet service than none at all.

"While I'm not familiar with the Google shareholder proposals, generally we strongly support a company's need to have an understanding of the connection between their business and human rights in the countries where they're doing business and providing services," said Theresa Harris, International Justice Project director, at the US-based World Organization for Human Rights.

Market Place

Computerworld Member Login


 

Smart SOA World Tour

Discover how SOA can create smarter outcomes for your business.

Attend and learn:

  • How SOA is helping leading companies to become more agile
  • Where you should be applying SOA processes in your company
  • The top SOA implementation mistakes to avoid

Click here for more information.
Whitepaper

Why Security SaaS Makes Sense Today

Corporate IT teams are waging a significant security battle on two fronts these days: stopping attacks via the Web and through email. Security SaaS can solves these problems and more. Read on to discover 7 reasons why security SaaS makes sense for your business.

Enterprise IT Buyer's Guide
Find Technology Vendors Fast
 
Find vendors by name | Find by category
Sponsored Links