Wednesday | 8 October, 2008
Computerworld
Microsoft bites the bullet on .Net suit
Vertical Computer Systems and Microsoft settled their .Net patent suit
Robert X. Cringely (InfoWorld) 05/08/2008 11:02:52

Computerworld Buyer's Guide - Vendors Matched to this Article
Additional Resources
Executive Guides
Whitepapers
Zones
Zone logoZones provide focussed content from Computerworld and leading technology partners.

Newsletter Subscription

Sign up for our Computerworld newsletters!
Computerworld's twice-daily news service keeps you in touch with the latest, most important headlines from Australia and around the world.
Keep up with the latest virtualisation technologies, products, news and features.
RSS Feeds

Two entries in a row about .Net. What is this blog coming to?

After the Seattle Post Intelligencer reported last week that Vertical Computer Systems (VCSY) and Microsoft had settled their .Net patent suit, three Cringesters emailed me on a Sunday wondering why this story hasn't gotten more attention. (Though I have my suspicions as to why they did -- see below.)

As reported in April 2007, Vertical claims that .Net violated the patents on its SiteFlash technology, a "system and method for generating Web sites in an arbitrary object framework." A day before an important hearing on how to define terms used in the suit, Microsoft settled, buying a nonexclusive license to VCSY's technology for an undisclosed amount.

If broadly interpreted, that license deal could spell trouble for more than just Microsoft, notes reader J. C.:

I think Microsoft's partners would want to know that's there's no impending injunction on these products now that the case is settled and Microsoft was granted a paid-up license to the patent (# 6826744). Vertical announced it in the following 8-K on Friday. The non-exclusive terms could be potentially disruptive to many other web content software companies like Adobe, IBM, Documentum, Vignette, etc.

Unlike many companies that exist purely as patent trolls, VCSY appears to have actual products, though not much in the way of actual revenue -- just under US$6 million according to its 2007 annual report, with losses of around US$700K.

I imagine that after the Microsoft license they're a little bit richer today.

Publicly traded on the Pink Sheets, VCSY's stock zoomed from 1.5 cents to 8 cents a share (as I write this) after news of the settlement leaked. Given the high volumes these stocks are traded at, even a shift of a penny can put thousands of dollars in one investor's pocket while taking thousands out of someone else's. As a result, the Pink Sheet markets are subject to heavy manipulation, usually in the form of spam and message board puffery. I suspect some of my faithful readers might have financial motivations for pushing this story.

So far, neither company has revealed any more details about the settlement. I'd be shocked if Microsoft dropped the tens of millions or more that some VCSY shareholders are speculating, or that this tiny Texas company will suddenly take on everyone who generates Web sites in a similar way. But maybe I'm wrong.

Computerworld Buyer's Guide - Vendors Matched to this Article
Market Place

Computerworld Member Login


 

Smart SOA World Tour

Discover how SOA can create smarter outcomes for your business.

Attend and learn:

  • How SOA is helping leading companies to become more agile
  • Where you should be applying SOA processes in your company
  • The top SOA implementation mistakes to avoid

Click here for more information.
Whitepaper

Wireless LANs: Is my enterprise at risk?

Achieve an overall understanding of the risks associated with wireless LANs. Discover their inherent properties, as well as what makes them different from wired networks. Read on to uncover a list of recently published articles on real-life breaches and incidents illustrating the need for proactive measures to mitigate wireless security risks.

Enterprise IT Buyer's Guide
Find Technology Vendors Fast
 
Find vendors by name | Find by category
Sponsored Links