Wednesday | 8 October, 2008
Computerworld
Urgent call for workplace e-mail laws
Sandra Rossi 10/03/2003 08:34:27

Related Features
  • +

    Ticked Off at Tick the Box Mentality 04/02/2008 13:01:15

    Does your executive search firm know the difference between an MIS manager and a CIO, and if it does, can it explain that difference to its corporate clients?
    Does your executive search firm know its MIS managers from its elbow? Does it even know the difference between an MIS manager and a CIO, and if it does, can it explain that difference to its corporate clients?
Additional Resources
Executive Guides
Whitepapers
Zones
Zone logoZones provide focussed content from Computerworld and leading technology partners.

Newsletter Subscription

Sign up for our Computerworld newsletters!
Computerworld's twice-daily news service keeps you in touch with the latest, most important headlines from Australia and around the world.
Keep up with the latest virtualisation technologies, products, news and features.
RSS Feeds

A series of inconsistent rulings before the Industrial Relations Commission (IRC) relating to e-mail misuse in the workplace has led Clayton Utz senior workplace relations partner Joe Catanzariti to call for urgent legislation.

Catanzariti said the confidence of companies seeking to "do the right thing by their staff by cracking down on employee e-mail and Internet misconduct is being undermined".

He said companies that terminate employees for improperly using e-mail or the Internet in the workplace are not penalised because tribunal outcomes are inconsistent due to a lack of a formal legislative framework.

"Responsible companies are deeply concerned that industrial relations appeals tribunals are sending mixed signals to employees engaging in blatant misconduct by failing to reach consistent verdicts," he said.

"Both federal and state governments must cooperate to develop and implement a legislative framework that provides certainty to those companies prepared to adopt a hard line against employees caught improperly using e-mail or Internet systems."

Computerworld has obtained details of more than half a dozen IRC examples that vary broadly from case to case. Companies that have been unsuccessful during unfair dismissal claims before the tribunal include the Roads and Traffic Authority, the Bank of Western Australia, Pacific Access and Phillip Morris Ltd.

In all cases employees were dismissed for e-mail and Internet misuse, but the employer's cases were unsuccessful because rulings "are made case by case and determined without a set framework", according to Catanzariti.

A recent case earlier this year that was successful involved Qantas Airways which terminated an employee for sending an inappropriate e-mail that "compromised" the reputation of Qantas.

Toyota was also successful after terminating an employee for storing and transmitting pornographic images while Australian Water Technologies successfully terminated an employee for downloading pornography and accessing these sites "frequently and for lengthy periods of time".

Market Place

Computerworld Member Login


 

Smart SOA World Tour

Discover how SOA can create smarter outcomes for your business.

Attend and learn:

  • How SOA is helping leading companies to become more agile
  • Where you should be applying SOA processes in your company
  • The top SOA implementation mistakes to avoid

Click here for more information.
Whitepaper

Taking On Demand CRM Integration to the Next Level

Discover the current integration challenges facing businesses attempting to deploy on demand CRM systems. Learn how to create comprehensive integration of your data, user interface and business process levels and transform a portfolio of disparate applications into a unified, virtual application suite.

Enterprise IT Buyer's Guide
Find Technology Vendors Fast
 
Find vendors by name | Find by category
Sponsored Links