- +
The Anytime, Anyplace Enterprise 03/06/2008 14:06:24
The interactive enterprise must be capable of providing access to its information and processes anytime and from anyplace over any network-connected device. Some CIOs are taking a phased approach in getting there.Customers, employees and partners expect to interact with their suppliers, employers and advisers when, where and how they like. Enterprise CIOs can deliver enhanced business performance and innovation for their firms by combining existing IT assets in conjunction with emerging consumer technologies. - +
SharePoint '07: Perfect Union of Info Management, IT? 03/06/2008 09:18:06
For companies that choose SharePoint, it makes sense for there to be a joined-up IT, knowledge and information functionMicrosoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS 2007) merges workflow, search and collaboration into one enterprise-wide information management platform. In this environment, does it make sense for the professions of records management (RM) knowledge management (KM) and information management (IM) to continue to work independently in their niche roles? - +
Understanding the Project Management Office 05/02/2008 12:59:53
Excellence in project management is essential, but PMOs can do as much harm as good. Here we examine the fundamentals and scope a proper role for a PMOExcellence in project management is essential, but PMOs can do as much harm as good. Here we examine the fundamentals and scope a proper role for a PMO - +
Forget Everything You've Learnt About Project Delivery, Part 1: Scope Management 05/02/2008 12:58:54
Acknowledging the two types of scope can force some of the problems with scope management to disappearAcknowledging the two types of scope can force some of the problems with scope management to disappear - +
A Tale of Two Call Centres 04/02/2008 13:18:44
Happy belated 2008.Happy belated 2008. Holidays are over. School's back. Traffic sucks. The weeks off were not only welcome but refreshing, although I must admit there was the odd day or two that saw my "peace on earth, good will to men" disposition - well, shall we say - lacking
Read up on the latest ideas and technologies from companies that sell hardware, software and services. Why Security SaaS Makes Sense Today
Strategies for Eliminating .PST Files
Solve Exchange Mailbox Storage Issues Once and for All
Wireless LANs: Is my enterprise at risk?
Delivering the Power of Choice with Microsoft Dynamics CRM
Vendor Influence Curves And How You Can Get The Best Value Out Of Your Network
Enterprise Wireless WLAN Security
Solve Exchange Storage Problems Once and For All: A New Approach without Stubs or Links
Zones provide focussed content from Computerworld and leading technology partners.Newsletter Subscription
Computerworld is undertaking a series of investigations into the most widely-used programming languages. Previously we spoke to Alfred v. Aho of AWK fame, and in this article we chat to Chet Ramey about his experience maintaining Bash.
Bash, or the Bourne-Again Shell is a Unix shell created in 1987 by Brian Fox. According to Wikipedia, the name is a pun on an earlier Unix shell by Stephen Bourne (called the Bourne shell), which was distributed with Version 7 Unix in 1978.
In 1990, Chet Ramey, Manager of the Network Engineering and Security Group in Technology Infrastructure Services at Case Western Reserve University, became the primary maintainer of the language.
Computerworld tracked down Ramey to find out more.
How did you first become involved with Bash?
In 1989 or so, I was doing network services and server support for [Case Western Reserve] University (CWRU), and was not satisfied with the shells I had available for that work. I wasn't really interested in using sh for programming and csh/tcsh for interactive use, so I began looking around for a version of sh with the interactive features I wanted (job control, line editing, command history, filename completion, and so on.)
I found a couple of versions of the SVR2 shell where those features had been added (credit to Doug Gwyn, Ron Natalie, and Arnold Robbins, who had done the work). These were available to CWRU because we were Unix source licensees, but I had trouble with them and couldn't extend them the way I wanted. Ken Almquist was writing ASH, but that had not been released, and there was a clone of the 7th edition shell, which eventually became PDksh, but that did not have the features I wanted either.
Brian Fox had begun writing BASH and readline (which was not, at that time, a separate library) the year before, when he was an employee of the FSF. The story, as I recall it, was that a volunteer had come forward and offered to write a Bourne Shell clone. After some time, he had produced nothing, so Richard Stallman directed Brian to write a shell. Stallman said it should take only a couple of months.
I started looking again, and ended up finding a very early version of Bash. I forget where I got it, but it was after Brian had sent a copy to Paul Placeway from Ohio State -- Paul had been the tcsh maintainer for many years, and Brian asked him to help with the line editing and redisplay code. I took that version, made job control work and fixed a number of other bugs, and sent my changes to Brian. He was impressed enough to begin working with me, and we went on from there.
I fixed many of the bugs people reported in the first public versions of BASH and fed those fixes back to Brian. We began working together as more or less co-maintainers, and when Brian moved on to other things, I still needed to support Bash for my local users, so I produced several local releases. Brian and I eventually merged those versions together, and when he moved away from Bash development, I took over.
Computerworld Member Login
Discover how SOA can create smarter outcomes for your business.
Attend and learn:
- How SOA is helping leading companies to become more agile
- Where you should be applying SOA processes in your company
- The top SOA implementation mistakes to avoid
Click here for more information.
- +
Computerworld Live Podcast #97: The Future of Enterprise Networking 25/07/2008 09:45:36
This week CW Live chats with Mark Thompson, global sales and marketing manager for HP ProCurve, on the future of the enterprise networking. Mark discusses the trends we can expect to see in the near future and how the right infrastructure can ensure your enterprise network is secure. - +
Computerworld Live Podcast #96: Security at the Edge 11/06/2008 09:22:22
CW Live speaks with Amol Mitra, HP ProCurve Director of Marketing for Asia Pacific and Japan. Today's topic: how enterprises are starting to shift away from simply controlling security via server logins, firewalls and moving to more adaptive security frameworks. - +
Data Management Edition #10: Multi-Petascale Systems 02/05/2008 09:12:33
This week we look at sustainability and the development of multicore technologies to build multi-petascale systems. - +
IT Security Edition #11: How to poison the Storm botnet 01/05/2008 08:51:55
This week CW Live presents a case study on how to poison the notorious Storm botnet . Plus we take a look at Cisco's plans for Ironport. - +
IT Security Edition #10: Cyber-battles fought and won 24/04/2008 11:09:47
Vendors bow to end user pressure to improve product security, and we take a look at the latest concepts shaping the cyber-battlefield of the future.
F-Secure achieves excellent results in Internet security suite comparison 2008-10-10 14:37:00+10
M2M Connectivity announces the new Sierra Wireless MC8792V embedded module for 900 MHz 3G/HSPA networks 2008-10-10 08:51:00+10
Pitney Bowes MapInfo Launches New Version of AnySite 2008-10-10 05:58:00+10
IOGEAR Gears Up in Australia 2008-10-09 20:18:00+10
Internet Service Providers offer new unlimited Online Backup from F-Secure 2008-10-09 19:42:00+10
Dude! You Say I Need an Application-Layer Firewall?!
Proxy firewall technologies have proven time and again to be more secure than “stateful” firewalls. They will also prove to be more secure than “deep inspection” firewalls. High-performance proxy firewalls are available today which are easily capable of handling gigabit-level traffic. Discover more by reading on.










