Sunday | 31 August, 2008
Computerworld
Will this tool replace Exchange with Gmail & keep Outlook?
Cemaphore Systems starts testing software for synchronizing Outlook and Gmail data
Eric Lai 05/06/2008 10:08:14

Computerworld Buyer's Guide - Vendors Matched to this Article
Related Features
  • +

    Ticked Off at Tick the Box Mentality 04/02/2008 13:01:15

    Does your executive search firm know the difference between an MIS manager and a CIO, and if it does, can it explain that difference to its corporate clients?
    Does your executive search firm know its MIS managers from its elbow? Does it even know the difference between an MIS manager and a CIO, and if it does, can it explain that difference to its corporate clients?
  • +

    Strategies for Dealing With IT Complexity 24/12/2007 10:30:47

    Every innovation, every business process improvement, comes with an IT complexity tax that must be paid by CIOs in time, money and sweat. Here are strategies to mitigate the increasing complexity of IT as it enables new business.
    Every innovation, every business process improvement, comes with an IT complexity tax that must be paid by CIOs in time, money and sweat. Here are strategies to mitigate the increasing complexity of IT as it enables new business.
Additional Resources
Executive Guides
Whitepapers
Zones
Zone logoZones provide focussed content from Computerworld and leading technology partners.

Newsletter Subscription

Sign up for our Computerworld newsletters!
Computerworld's twice-daily news service keeps you in touch with the latest, most important headlines from Australia and around the world.
Keep up with the latest virtualisation technologies, products, news and features.
RSS Feeds

Microsoft's Exchange Server may be the king of corporate e-mail, but it has plenty of haters, especially among smaller companies that find managing the software and dealing with e-mail backups to be a huge hassle.

Meanwhile, Microsoft's Outlook e-mail client has its issues -- sluggish performance, a user interface that isn't especially user-friendly and ever-increasing complexity. But it maintains a devoted following among the tens of millions of business workers who practically live in the software while on the job.

Not surprisingly, there is no shortage of alternatives that let you get rid of Exchange Server in your data center while keeping Outlook on the front end. They range from open-source Exchange clones to Web-hosted Exchange offerings from Microsoft and countless other service providers.

"If you're able to replace the back-end mail servers so no end users notice, then IT gets a less expensive e-mail infrastructure but doesn't have to deal with angry users set in their ways," said Guy Creese, an analyst at Burton Group.

Google's Gmail service joined the list of alternatives last fall, after Google added support for the Internet Message Access Protocol. IMAP enables rapid synchronization of messages between Gmail and desktop e-mail clients such as Outlook, and between the mail server and various end-user devices. And Gmail is free for some users and inexpensive for others -- a one-year subscription to Google Apps, which includes enterprise support for Gmail, costs US$50 per user.

"Many of my customers with under 50 employees don't even need Exchange, so I see a lot of growth in Outlook-to-Gmail," said Ronnie Mansoor, CEO of Implicit, a developer of Outlook add-on software.

However, Google didn't go all the way with its IMAP support: Users still can't download their Gmail contact lists or calendars into their Outlook e-mail clients.

Now a software vendor named Cemaphore Systems is publicly releasing a beta version of a tool that lets users synchronize their e-mail, contacts and calendars between Outlook and Gmail. That could make it possible for companies to use Gmail as an inexpensive disaster recovery backup to Exchange Server, or perhaps to dump Exchange altogether.

Cemaphore is taking signups from users who want to test its new MailShadow for Google Apps software, known informally as MailShadowG. The company said that a commercial release is expected to ship during the third quarter and will cost US$49.95 per user annually, although beta participants will be able to get the first year for US$29.95 per seat.

Unveiled several months ago, MailShadowG has already gotten some early-adopter praise. In March, blogger Robert Scoble raved that during a demo by Cemaphore, MailShadowG synchronized his e-mail and calendar between Outlook and Gmail in a matter of seconds. "Google's synchronizer sucks compared to Cemaphore's," he wrote. "It's slow and buggy."

"Google may sync every 30 or 60 minutes. We're firing as the events fire," Cemaphore CEO Tyrone Pike said in an interview on Tuesday. "That's why we call ours a continuity product, not a sync product."

Pike also claimed that MailShadowG doesn't create multiple versions of the same calendar event, a problem with some calendar synchronization software. "Our algorithm is very immune to that," he said.

Computerworld Buyer's Guide - Vendors Matched to this Article

Comments

Yes, there are options

Exchange/Outlook is not the only option. Groupwise from Novell is way, way ahead in functionality, security, interoperability and value for money.

Market Place

Computerworld Member Login


 

Prioritizing Services with IT Service Management (ITSM)

Computerworld Live Webinar
Wednesday 20th, August 2008
11:00am EST (Sydney, Australia)

To be repeated on:

Thursday 4th, September 2008
11:00am EST (Sydney Australia)

Sign up and receive a free copy of The Forrester WaveTM Service Desk Management Tools, Q2 2008 at the conclusion of the Webinar.

Attend and discover:

  • How to deliver value to your business through ITSM
  • Best practice ITSM implementation
  • Why emphasis is changing from optimizing IT management processes to better servicing customers and demonstrating real dollar value
  • If service-oriented ITSM is best for your business
Whitepaper

Unified Communications: Justifications and Predictions

Building a business case for Unified Communications is currently more of an art than a science. However, the difficulty of building a business case for UC does not mean that there is none - just that we need to view (and measure) UC's benefits in accordance with the stage of maturity of the technology's adoption. Read on to find out more.

Enterprise IT Buyer's Guide
Find Technology Vendors Fast
 
Find vendors by name | Find by category
Sponsored Links