Monday | 8 September, 2008
Computerworld
Study: Comcast, Cox blocking BitTorrent throughout US
Max Planck Institute reports high percentages of hosts blocked even during non-peak hours
Brad Reed (Network World) 16/05/2008 10:28:46

Additional Resources
Executive Guides
Whitepapers
Zones
Zone logoZones provide focussed content from Computerworld and leading technology partners.

Newsletter Subscription

Sign up for our Computerworld newsletters!
Computerworld's twice-daily news service keeps you in touch with the latest, most important headlines from Australia and around the world.
Keep up with the latest virtualisation technologies, products, news and features.
RSS Feeds

The Max Planck Institute for Software Systems released a study Thursday showing that Cox Communications and Comcast have been blocking BitTorrent transfers within the United States at both peak and non-peak hours.

Overall, the study focuses on whether BitTorrent upload traffic has been manipulated at 8,175 different locations around the world by using a testing suite called Glastnost. While only around 7.7 per cent of hosts worldwide reported having their BitTorrent traffic throttled, 87.8 per cent of all blocked hosts were located within the United States, where nearly one-quarter of all hosts tested experienced blocked BitTorrent traffic. Of those nearly 600 blocked hosts, the vast majority were located on Comcast or Cox networks, the study reports. What's more, says the study, all blocked hosts in the United States are located on cable networks.

The study also finds that both Comcast and Cox block BitTorrent uploads during both peak hours and during mornings and weekends, when traffic is typically less heavy. Comcast, for instance, blocked BitTorrent traffic on just over 60 per cent of all tests conducted on Saturdays, which is a slightly higher percentage of tests blocked during weekdays; on Sundays, the percentage of blocked tests drops significantly to just over 50 per cent. Cox, on the other hand, was more likely to block BitTorrent traffic on the weekends than on the weekdays, with nearly 70 per cent of all tests conducted on Saturdays and Sundays blocked. The institute qualifies the Cox data, however, by noting that Cox tests comprised a much smaller sample size than the Comcast tests.

The institute says that all tests for the study were conducted between March 18 and May 15. Comcast said back in March that it had agreed to stop targeting BitTorrent uploads or any specific individual protocols in its traffic-shaping practices. Although the company did not set a specific date for when it would stop targeting BitTorrent, it did say that it hoped to have its new traffic-shaping protocols in place by the middle of the year.

In a statement issued Thursday, Comcast took issue with the institute's assertion that it was blocking traffic and said that a more accurate term for its practices would be traffic management.

"Comcast does not, has not, and will not block any Web sites or online applications, including peer-to-peer services like BitTorrent," the company said. "We have acknowledged that we manage peer-to-peer traffic in a limited manner to minimize network congestion. While we believe our current network management approach was a reasonable choice, we are now working with a variety of companies including BitTorrent."

Comcast has been under fire from such advocacy groups as the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Free Press since last October, when the Associated Press reported that the company was actively interfering with some of its customers' ability to share files online.

Essentially, the AP has reported, Comcast has been employing technology that is activated when a user attempts to share a complete file with another user through such P2P technologies as BitTorrent and Gnutella. As the user is uploading the file, Comcast sends a message to both the uploader and the downloader telling them there has been an error within the network and that a new connection must be established. Because the message sent to users does not appear to be sent directly from Comcast, many critics have accused Comcast of sending forged or spoofed packets that they say are deceiving to consumers.

Market Place

Computerworld Member Login


 

Prioritizing Services with IT Service Management (ITSM)

Computerworld Live Webinar
Wednesday 20th, August 2008
11:00am EST (Sydney, Australia)

To be repeated on:

Thursday 4th, September 2008
11:00am EST (Sydney Australia)

Sign up and receive a free copy of The Forrester WaveTM Service Desk Management Tools, Q2 2008 at the conclusion of the Webinar.

Attend and discover:

  • How to deliver value to your business through ITSM
  • Best practice ITSM implementation
  • Why emphasis is changing from optimizing IT management processes to better servicing customers and demonstrating real dollar value
  • If service-oriented ITSM is best for your business
Whitepaper

Dude! You Say I Need an Application-Layer Firewall?!

Proxy firewall technologies have proven time and again to be more secure than “stateful” firewalls. They will also prove to be more secure than “deep inspection” firewalls. High-performance proxy firewalls are available today which are easily capable of handling gigabit-level traffic. Discover more by reading on.

Enterprise IT Buyer's Guide
Find Technology Vendors Fast
 
Find vendors by name | Find by category
Sponsored Links