Friday | 9 January, 2009
Spamhaus appeals possible shutdown ruling
Spamhaus has told a U.S. court that it will appeal a recent decision that threatened to shut it down.

The Spamhaus Project has told a U.S. court that it plans to appeal a recent ruling that threatened the volunteer organization with millions of dollars in legal fines and a possible shutdown of database of known spammers.

The notice was filed Friday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois by lawyers with Jenner & Block, a Chicago law firm that is now representing Spamhaus.

Spamhaus, based in the U.K., has a team of 25 investigators and claims to block between eight billion and ten billion e-mail messages per day. Its database is used by several major security vendors, including Microsoft.

The filing marks the group's return to a legal fight against an e-mail marketing company called e360 Insight that Spamhaus had tried its best to ignore.

Spamhaus had not shown up in court to dispute the charges against it, and the organization has made it clear that it does not accept U.S. jurisdiction over its activities. However, this position was apparently reconsidered after a proposed court order was published earlier this month calling on the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) and Spamhaus's registrar, Tucows, to pull the project's domain name.

"Spamhaus is... concerned at how far a U.S. court will go before asking itself if it has jurisdiction, and is intending to contest the ruling in order to stamp out further attempts by spammers to abuse the U.S. court system in this way," the organization said in a statement on its Web site. That statement can be found here.

The order, written by the plaintiffs in the case, does not have the force of law, but if the judge decides to accept it, observers said that it could kick off a power struggle between ICANN, which is responsible for the Internet's domain name system, and the U.S. courts.

Spamhaus's new legal counsel, Jenner & Block, is a well-respected firm with over 400 lawyers.

It has offered its services in the case for free, said John Reid, a Spamhaus volunteer. "We are a nonprofit organization; spammers know this. That's why they sue, hoping we cannot afford to defend ourselves," Reid said. "Luckily, since we're the good guys, there are a lot of great lawyers, law firms, and law professors around the world willing to step up and help."

"We were asked to provide support by a number of folks with whom we've been associated in the past," said Matthew Neumeier, a partner with Jenner & Block. He declined to say who had asked the firm to help out in the case.

E360 Insight could not be reached immediately for comment on this story. In a statement on its Web site, the e-mail marketer cited Spamhaus's earlier decision to walk away from the case as evidence that it "could not produce its justification for the listing of e360 on its blacklists."

Computerworld Buyer's Guide - Vendors Matched to this Article
Computerworld Buyer's Guide - Vendors Matched to this Article
Additional Resources
Executive Guides
Whitepapers
Zones
Zone logoZones provide focussed content from Computerworld and leading technology partners.
Newsletter Subscription
Sign up for our Computerworld newsletters!
RSS Feeds
Market Place

 

Smart SOA World Tour

Discover how SOA can create smarter outcomes for your business.

Attend and learn:

  • How SOA is helping leading companies to become more agile
  • Where you should be applying SOA processes in your company
  • The top SOA implementation mistakes to avoid

Click here for more information.
Whitepaper

Solve Exchange Mailbox Storage Issues Once and for All

Join industry expert Bob Spurzem and Chuck Arconi of Fox Hollow to discover how to reduce Exchange total storage and keep it at a manageable level. Learn how Exchange storage growth can be contained without sacrificing security and accessibility.

Enterprise IT Buyer's Guide
Find Technology Vendors Fast
 
Find vendors by name | Find by category
Sponsored Links