Vehicle to vehicle communications could drive us to a safer place: Industry

The technology will be in cars in Australia by 2017, says Cohda Wireless

Photo credit: Ford Australia.

Photo credit: Ford Australia.

Imagine you’re driving on a highway and someone in front changes lane without warning. You try to take evasive action in time to avoid an accident.

In the near future your car could be the one taking control if it has a vehicle to vehicle (V2V) communication device fitted which allows cars to "talk" to each other.

While the notion of driverless cars and smart vehicles has long been the realm of science fiction writers such as Isaac Asimov, this fiction is now fact.

V2V technology, which was developed by Adelaide-based company Cohda Wireless, gives drivers a 360-degree awareness of surrounding vehicles by broadcasting information about a car’s current position, speed and direction at a rate of 10 times per second.

According to CEO Paul Gray, half of the cars involved in V2V trials around the world contain Cohda equipment. The company participated in a trial with the United States Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in February 2013.

The trial involved 2800 vehicles, about 1500 of which had the Cohda device installed. In February 2014, NHTSA announced that it would start taking steps to allow the use of V2V communication technology for cars.

According to NHTSA research, safety applications using V2V could address a number of crashes involving two or more cars.

“With safety data such as speed and location flowing from nearby vehicles, cars can identity risks and provide drivers with warnings to avoid other vehicles in common crash types such as rear-end, lane change and intersection crashes. These safety apps have been demonstrated with everyday drivers under both real-world and controlled test conditions,” read the report.

Gray said the major benefit of the NHTSA decision was "market clarity".

“The market will now switch from a trial phase to a deployment phase, a step change that enables Cohda to now engage earnestly with car makers.”

“The key longer term benefits are twofold: Firstly, we now see production vehicles containing Cohda products hitting the road as early as 2016. Secondly, a mandate from the US government will see this rolled out to all new vehicles in a few short years after that.”

Cohda CTO Paul Alexander told Computerworld Australia that he anticipates V2V technology will start appearing in cars in Australia in 2017. However, a regulatory framework and infrastructure has to be agreed upon with Austroads, the Australian and New Zealand association of transport authorities, first.

“The current topics are really around what [V2V] standards exist globally and what Australia should consider going forward for our regulatory framework,” Alexander said.

“From the infrastructure side, there are applications that can be deployed to meet safety and traveller information services. By deploying some infrastructure, it’s quite possible to enhance the features sets that are available in the vehicles.”

He added that there is one insurance company in Australia that has expressed interest in the V2V technology.

“The insurance company is inquisitive and want to understand what this system is so they can optimise their [insurance] offerings,” he said.

One possible scenario is that drivers who have the V2V technology installed in their car may receive lower premiums from insurance companies.

In October 2013, a device called Insurance Box that monitors vehicle speeds was rolled out by insurance firms QBE and NIA Underwriting Agency in conjunction with insurance technology provider SSP.

Insurance Box uses an on-board telematics device and can be fitted to most cars manufactured after 2000. Telematics is the integrated use of telecommunications and informatics.

Tags vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication technologyconnected carsForrester ResearchFordCohda Wireless

More about QBETransportation

1 Comment

Gordon Drennan

1

There are a lot of ways this technology COULD reduce crashes. But, like all computer based things, there are also a lot of ways it could fail to work. The question is whether the nett benefit justifies the cost, given that road deaths are measured per 100 million kilometres because they are in fact quite rare, and because road deaths are overwhelmingly the result of deliberate risk taking behaviour. Computer people understand computers. They don't understand drivers.

Comments are now closed

Apple surrenders top tablet satisfaction spot to Amazon

READ THIS ARTICLE
DO NOT SHOW THIS BOX AGAIN [ x ]