Drupal 8: Re-architecting for world domination

Drupal's creator, Dries Buytaert, on Drupal 8 and the open source project's future in the enterprise

Drupal 8 will be the open-source project's "boldest release to date", according to Drupal's creator, Dries Buytaert. The new version of Drupal is due at the end of the year or "whenever it's ready" and includes significant behind-the-scenes changes, such as the incorporation of elements of the Symfony2 Web framework.

Buytaert, who is also the founder of Drupal services firm Acquia, has ambitious goals for Drupal, as it continues to shift away from purely a content management system towards a unified Web platform that organisations can standardise on to build Web-based services, for both internal and customer-focussed sites.

We're really ready to compete hard with the proprietary software vendors

These can range from delivering an organisation's key corporate websites to intranets, smaller-scale sites built for one-off events and other public and internal Web tools.

"Ten years ago, most organisations had one website or no websites," Buytaert told Computerworld Australia.

"But nowadays, most organisations have dozens of websites. We have some customers that have 800 Drupal sites, and then another one has thousands of Drupal sites. It's very common; even at a small company like Acquia we have probably 30 websites — intranet, our main website, some event websites that we do."

Drupal Association to focus on governance, D8 launch
From zero to hero: Suncorp's Drupal 'leap of faith'
DrupalCon Sydney: Looking beyond content management
SBS prepares for Q1 Drupal CMS rollout

Buytaert said that organisations have frequently ended up using point solutions for different websites, ending up with multiple platforms to deliver a corporate website, an intranet, a blog and a community portal, for example.

"A lot of organisations that we talk to, they're in this giant mess where they have 12 platforms to run a hundred sites and they're different technology stacks — some are in Java, and .NET and PHP," Buytaert said.

"There's a real desire in the market right now to simplify that and standardise on newer systems."

Enter Drupal. Buytaert sees this as a real strength of the project: being able to use the same core platform to build multiple sites, sometimes wildly different in style and purpose, for an organisation. A particular strength in this regard is the growth of distributions of Drupal: re-packaged versions of Drupal that 'out of the box' are designed to fulfil the needs of particular sectors.

For example, aGov, a distribution of Drupal produced by development shop PreviousNext is designed to offer a complete Web solution for Australian government departments and other organisations.

It ensures that sites will comply with the Web Guide produced by the Australian Government Information Management Office, which sets out a series of mandatory requirements for the websites of federal agencies, addressing issues such as accessibility.

"We find more and more organisations say we're just going to standardise on Drupal," Buytaert said.

"It's more efficient because there's no licence fee, but also because instead of having all of these different engineers that have different skillsets, we can just make a Drupal team and they can maintain all of our websites."

Buytaert cited the example of multinational pharmaceutical company Pfizer, which has standardised on Drupal as its Web platform.

Distributions are a key part of competing with companies that offer proprietary Web experience management products like Adobe. Buytaert said one of the issues faced by Drupal is that Adobe and Sitecore can offer complete, all-encompassing solutions out of the box.

"I think they sell solutions," Buytaert said. "Drupal is not a solution out of the box. It's a great platform to build things with, but where Adobe differs is that they have a solution. They've packaged up what they have to fix a specific problem and they speak the language of a business owner versus a developer."

Dries Buytaert
Dries Buytaert

Tags cmsopen sourcecontent managementdrupal

More about AcquiaAdobe SystemsCMSInterwovenPfizer AustraliaSBSSitecoreSuncorp GroupVignetteWYSIWYG




Wordpress and Drupal are both like Ferrari's with a Lada engine. Beautiful on the outside, but rotten on the inside. Not everyone who can write code is a programmer. The Drupal engineers can write code, but programmer's... they are NOT. The only place where I use Wordpress and Drupal is in my Secure Web Programming course as an example of how NOT to write code.



It kind of makes sense to make a website on a server, instead of making it on a local machine (with dreamweaver or frontpage) and then having to upload the files to a server : )

If drupal wants to *win* make "search" really strong and maybe even allow "my search" (that's the drupal-search on my site) to hook / query other (drupal-search)sites? watchout google ; )



Aethedor, do you mind to provide Drupal hacked sites stat because of this:

--- Aethedor "The only place where I use Wordpress and Drupal is in my Secure Web Programming course as an example of how NOT to write code." ---



freeside - Drupal apachesolr integration can search multiple data sources (Drupal + non-Drupal) and present them in a unified interface. This is super-powerful at a government level where there are continually evolving accessibility requirements. Instead of updating several old systems just bring in Drupal and leverage its accessibility compliance as a front end to the legacy systems.

and +1 on JC's comment above - let's see some data please. I think the guys at the White House may be interested as whitehouse.gov is Drupal.



Aethedor, you can't just say two of the worlds most popular cms platforms are insecure and bad without citing some examples of how. Educate us.



@Aethedor, I'm so impressed... you should know the whole source codes of Drupal and WordPress... Yeah! You are too high for us poor people. But... what's your prefered tool ? banshee ?



@Aethedor, yes, indeed, let's have some examples -- and while you're at it, examples of systems that don't have those vulnerabilities.



mind you, drupal has issues, as does wordpress. there's not a simple metaphor for their failings. the traditional views (wordpress is easy, drupal is hard) are largely true but incomplete. wordpress is pretty hard in some ways -- drupal is easier to remote-manage, easier to script complex installs with, better-suited to integration without coding (contrary to the common view), more database-agnostic and platform-agnostic.

and it's also a hell of a lot HEAVIER. wordpress will just run faster out of the box. If you can constrain your expectations, you'll build and run faster on Wordpress; if you can't constrain your expectations of the public-facing UI, IA & design, then you need to bite the bullet and use something heavier (like Drupal) and plan to spend money on optimizing performance post-facto.



We are using Drupal to run circles around sharepoint and never looked back. Its powerful good stuff if you dont want to spend years and $$$$$$$ reinventing the wheel for your team.



Yes Hugo (#1), please tell us, why are you bashing other cms's again? Whe all shoeld use banshee and hiawatha right? ;-) you must be lonely man...



Aetherdor is a typical "I-have-my-own-CMS-I-know-everything" guy.

Comments are now closed

Amazon vs. Google vs. Windows Azure: Cloud computing speed showdown

MORE IN Open Source