Youth increasingly apathetic towards internet piracy

"It might be illegal, but I don't think a lot people view that as wrong; we don’t care," said 18-year-old speaker

Australian youth are becoming increasingly apathetic about internet piracy, a discussion forum held by the Australian Communications and Media Authority has revealed.

At the ACMA Young Citizens in a Changing Media World forum earlier this week, one of the young speakers said young people “don’t care” about internet piracy because the moral codes of their generation differ from those of generations before them.

“I think for young people, our morals and our guidelines are very different to perhaps what our parents’ generation, our grandparents’ generations think is right or wrong,” said 18-year-old Ella.

“[Internet piracy] might be illegal, but I don't think that a lot people view that as wrong; we don’t care.

“I'm sorry if your ‘bajillion-dollar’ production company is out for my $2, but I'd rather save that for later.”

Network Ten’s head of children’s television and documentary unit, Cherrie Bottger, who was one of the adult speakers at the forum, attributed this indifference towards copyright piracy and infringement among young people to a lack of education on the issue.

“I don't think kids understand that if they're dancing to a Michael Jackson song that a third party has to agree to that music being there,” she said.

“And I really don't think young people understand that certain issues are illegal, which was touched on before, and it does give them notoriety.”

A 15-year-old speaker, Julia, agreed with Cherrie that education on internet piracy has been limited and insufficient.

“We don't get told what is illegal and what isn't,” she said.

“The line is very hazy with what is illegal and with what isn't illegal because it's such a broad thing.

“There's not a lot of focus on us as young people getting told what is right and what is wrong because it's always changing.”

However, Ella knocked back claims that young people were uneducated on the subject and instead, reiterated: “I think a lot of young people do understand that the song or movie they clicked or whatever it was does belong to someone else… The thing is, young people don't care.”

Queensland University of Technology law lecturer and former chair of Electronic Frontiers Australia, Dr Nicolas Suzor, also discredited a lack of education to be the primary reason for a growing apathy towards internet piracy among young people.

Instead, he blamed the media industry’s failure to keep pace with the change of technology and demand of consumers for its vulnerability to — and encouragement of — internet piracy.

“[There] is a growing disconnect between the legitimate business model that is available, and the needs and desires of the current generation of media consumers,” Suzor said.

Dr Suzor pointed out the “ease of access” to online content has influenced the demand for “cheap, fast and high quality access to digital media.”

“Until we see more innovative models [of distribution] emerge, people will continually be pushed towards illegitimate means of accessing content,” he said.

Instead of enforcing archaic business models onto consumers, Suzor suggested that businesses should embrace online methods of media distribution, such as iTunes and Netflix.

“iTunes has been hugely successful in changing the way that people engage with media, particularly with music online, by providing people with a really easy and fast legitimate method to access their music,” he said.

“People don’t necessarily want to go to a video store to hire out a DVD… Services like Netflix allow people to pay a monthly subscription and be able to stream any movies they would like to their computers or to their television at any time. That makes a huge difference to consumer demand.

“I think that it’s certainly true when people are given a fairly easy way to access media, they choose to pay a small and reasonable fee for easy access rather than take the risk of downloading.”

In addition to providing more simple and legitimate channels of media distribution, Suzor said levels of apathy will decrease by creating a direct connection between consumers, artists and production studios by involving consumers in the development of projects.

However, Martin Cocker, NetSafe New Zealand’s executive director, warned the flippant attitude of young people could harm their future by being classified as a criminal if caught for piracy.

“The key things for me are those that have a long-term detrimental effect, things that we should be worried about, such as young people producing content that makes them a criminal is a serious concern,” he said.

“Australia and New Zealand are reasonable about what they prosecute, but that's not the case in every country.

“First and foremost, you have to know the law, absolutely, take your own risks… But don't cross the line, don't become a criminal, don't do things that will stop you from having the future you want.”

The comments follow the creation of a Notice Scheme to educate Australians about illegal downloading, a joint effort between the Communications Alliance with Telstra Bigpond, iiNet, Optus, iPrimus and Internode.

The scheme will target internet users who infringe copyrights under the Copyright Act 1968, such as peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing and pirated downloads, with internet service providers (ISPs) required to send education and warning notices to customers whose internet accounts may have been used for file sharing.

Exetel's chief executive, John Linton, has labelled the initiative as a “waste of time”.

Follow Diana Nguyen on Twitter: @diananguyen9

Follow Computerworld Australia on Twitter: @ComputerworldAU

More about: Bigpond, Electronic Frontiers Australia, etwork, iiNet, Internode, iPrimus, Netflix, Network Ten, Optus, Primus, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland University of Technology, Technology, Telstra, Telstra Bigpond
References show all

Comments

1

Steven Schneir

Sat 10/12/2011 - 21:39

"However, Martin Cocker, NetSafe New Zealand’s executive director, warned the flippant attitude of young people could harm their future by being classified
as a criminal if caught for piracy.

“The key things for me are those that have a long-term detrimental effect, things that we should be worried about, such as young people producing content
that makes them a criminal is a serious concern,” he said.

“Australia and New Zealand are reasonable about what they prosecute, but that's not the case in every country.

“First and foremost, you have to know the law, absolutely, take your own risks… But don't cross the line, don't become a criminal, don't do things that
will stop you from having the future you want.”"

Complete idiocy, first. the risk of getting caught is near zero, and second copyright infringement for private use is a civil offense.

The law is so draconian that even sharing one's Itunes library with a circle of friend is illegal.

Why should I respect a law making everyday activity illegal?

2

Enigmatic

Mon 12/12/2011 - 13:36

I think they have it completely wrong. It isn't a lack of education that is the problem, its the "nature of the beast" that is causing this issue.

How can you tell a kid that it is theft when nobody has actually suffered a loss? Sure the record and picture companies are going to jump up and down and scream that you have taken their profit, but it is ARGUABLE as to whether that child would have purchased it at all if there was not an option of piracy.

It is wrong for them to say "100% of all piracy would have been converted to profit". So for as long as they hold onto this obvious mis-truth, youth will not see it as piracy because it is already clear to them that companies make more than enough money as it is, the detriment they cause by pirating is either negligible or non-existant.

Companies have been claiming for years that piracy is causing them to lose, yet they keep making money, and box offices keep raking in more and more and breaking more and more records. So their logic flies in the face of the evidence we are seeing with our own eyes.

All this does is creates this perception that companies are money-hungry, greedy, heartless behemouths who try to squeeze every dollar out of anybody they can, ruining people in the process by hitting them with multi-million dollar law suits. It creates the robin hood mentality that it isn't wrong to take from companies like that, and when their profits have never looked better even in the middle of a global crisis, it makes those people who are struggling to make ends meet truely question whether it is a crime to watch something they couldn't normally aford when the money has already been made and the studio is off onto its next big money making scheme.

Lets face it... Movies and Music are NOT designed for the betterment of humanity, they are not there to give us enlightenment or turn us into better people... they are PROFIT-GENERATING ENTERTAINMENT. Their entire reason for being is to make money and the studios make this clear. Whatever they can rip of, re-boot, redo, sequalize, trilogize or labotamize just to make a dollar they have no problems doing it.

We teach young children not to steal by taking something away from them and they feel the loss by no longer having something.... how do we teach kids that piracy is a crime when they see no consequences to doing it? No company closes its doors, nobody loses their job, nothing ends, and studios keep making record profits.

What's next? Are studios going to make it illegal for people to invite friends over to watch movies? After all... by having a friend over, you are taking money away from the studio by stopping that person from going out and hiring/buying the movie themselves. How is that any different to piracy? Both have the same effect on the studio, yet one is completely legal and acceptable, while the other is the worst crime in humanity (as far as the studios are concerned).

Talk about mixed messages !!!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the Computerworld comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: ACMA Young Citizens in a Changing Media World, Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), copyright infringement, Dr Nicolas Suzor, internet piracy, Queensland University of Technology (QUT)
Whitepapers
All whitepapers
Sign up now to get free exclusive access to reports, research and invitation only events.
Featured Download
/downloads/product/138/driverscanner-2010/

DriverScanner 2010

DriverScanner scans your computer and provides you with a list of drivers that need to be updated. All you have to do, then, is simply ...

Computerworld newsletter

Join the most dedicated community for IT managers, leaders and professionals in Australia