NBN may diminish regional broadband services: Internode

Internode has warned that the NBN Co's costs to regional retail service providers may see many pull out of provision, including potentially Internode itself

Internode has warned that access to broadband services in regional areas may actually decrease under the National Broadband Network (NBN) due to the costs NBN Co charges retail service providers (RSPs) to supply services.

Speaking at a Joint Committee hearing, general manager regulatory and corporate affairs at Internode, John Lindsay, said regional service providers – particularly those that operated their own networks – were under threat due to the fixed $20 per megabit fee NBN Co charges.

According to Lindsay the issue was that fee was a “fairly arbitrary number” which was not in line with the costs experienced by network operators whereby costs decreased relative to an increasing volume of network traffic.

“Largely our backhaul costs in capitals cities are fixed costs so as our traffic on those networks rises, our costs remain largely static,” he said.

“So, our cost per megabit to use those networks actually falls as the costs remain the same as the traffic rises.

“The challenge for existing regional service providers is that they have all the traditional overheads of connecting to the NBN, all the overheads of running their existing network, and they are already operating on very squeezed margins…

“It means that in the build up to the NBN, those regional service providers face significant increased costs and a dual network operating overhead which is really likely to spell the end of them.”

Lindsay said there was a “huge amount of uncertainty” as to what it would cost the company to supply services in regional areas and the company was yet to decide whether it would supply NBN services to existing regional ADSL subscribers.

Responding to questioning from Senator Nick Xenophon, Lindsay agreed that as a result of NBN Co’s fees, less competition in regional areas may arise.

“It is likely that there will be less competition in regional areas on the basis that the cost of entering or remaining in the market is likely to be significantly higher than it is today,” he said.

Lindsay’s comments follow similar remarks from Internode chief Simon Hackett in July that NBN Co's business model and concentrating virtual circuit (CVC) pricing were financially unviable.

Lindsay also reiterated Internode’s critique of the 121 points of interconnect arguing that the location of these had also been selected arbitrarily by the ACCC which had only taken into regard that there was “the potential for competitive backhaul, rather than the presence of it at the points of interconnect.”

“We think the 121 points decision should be reversed, largely on the basis is that there is actually no competitive provision of backhaul and it imposes significant extra costs on retail service providers,” he said.

Lindsay said that as at mid last week Internode has some 466 active NBN services, of which about half were on the Tasmanian NBN network. The company had added about 80 new NBN services in the past week.

He said the majority of the NBN services – which are offered as free trials -- were connected to 100 megabit plans but the company expected to see most of these revert to either 25 or 12 megabit plans once customers were asked to start paying for the services.

Join the Computerworld Australia group on Linkedin. The group is open to IT Directors, IT Managers, Infrastructure Managers, Network Managers, Security Managers, Communications Managers.

More about: ACCC, CVC, etwork, Internode
References show all

Comments

HUH

1

AHHHH Internode at it again, first you release prices for your NBN backed broadband that were 200% greater than your compitition and now your complaining about pricing for people in regional Australia......

The article should read as follows,

If people go with Internode in regional Australia your going to get overcharged and get excuses from a 3rd rate company whose boss should be fired for being so utterly out of touch with his stratigic pricing plans.

Steve

2

Did anyone actually check this article prior to print? $20 a megabyte... hmmm, its not a Telstra mobile phone plan he's talking about...

Brad

3

Actually, the article said $20 per MegaBIT- which is 1/8th of a Megabyte. Typical of journos not checking their facts...

Megabit??

4

Dear Author,
1GB = 8192 megabits.
At $20 a megabit, you are implying that NBN are charging $163840 per GB.

Peter

5

Were talking bandwidth and not data usage so $20 per megabit of bandwidth is correct.

Tim Lohman

6

Yes, what Peter said.

Ozzie

7

Wish I could get fibre for $20 per megabit backhaul. Anyhow, the argument doesn't make sense with the info provided; if it's per megabit then they're talking speed, not data volume. Regardless of that, not sure where these guys are coming from as there seems to be little competition in rural areas from what I can see. Providers other than Telstra seem to have cherry picked the areas where they'll operate and left a whole lot out.

Austcc

8

It is $20 per month for each Mb/s. That gives you just under half a GB an hour, or 240GB/month if you run that link flat out for 18 hours/day

Comments are now closed.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: internode, nbn co, NBN
Whitepapers
All whitepapers
Sign up now to get free exclusive access to reports, research and invitation only events.
Featured Download
/downloads/product/15/angry-ip-scanner/

Angry IP Scanner

Angry IP Scanner (or simply ipscan) is an open-source and cross-platform network scanner designed to be fast and simple to use. It scans IP addresses ...

Computerworld newsletter

Join the most dedicated community for IT managers, leaders and professionals in Australia