700MHz national emergency system to cost billions: AMTA

A stand-alone national network for use in natural disasters would also deprive industry of revenue opportunities
  • (Computerworld)
  • 09 August, 2011 12:15

The federal government should not build a dedicated national emergency services network based on the 700Mhz spectrum and instead, leave it to the private market to supply telecommunications services during disasters, the Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association (AMTA) has said.

At a public hearing into the capacity of communication networks and emergency warning systems to deal with emergencies and natural disasters, AMTA chief executive director, Chris Althaus, said such a network would cost tax payers billions and deprive industry of valuable spectrum.

“It is not just building a network; it is operating it and maintaining it in a very big country with a very small population,” he said.

“The needs in an emergency are sporadic — yes, there are peaks — but most of the time, there would be very low levels of activity and from a cost-benefit [perspective] that is very suspect.

“We have a network mosaic in the country which covers 99 per cent of the landmass. It is inconceivable that government in this day and age would invest in a duplicate network… To give you a sense of dimension, to go from 98 to 99 per cent coverage in Australia requires the addition of 900,000 square kilometres of network coverage.”

In addition to the significant cost of building a national emergency network, Althaus argued there would be significant opportunity costs to the telecommunications industry from being unable to access 700MHz spectrum.

“It can’t be overstressed that you would be seeing billions of dollars of investment in something that would effectively duplicate what is already in place,” he said.

“The emergency services have extraordinary expertise at a lot of things, including telecommunications, but they should be doing what they do best and we should be doing what we do best.”

“It would be a shameful waste of 700meg spectrum to have it sitting, essentially fallow for extensive period of time when natural disasters are not taking place.”

Telcos not price-gauging emergency services

Responding to suggestions the costs for capacity for emergency services organisations (ESOs) during recent disasters had been too high, Althaus said it was best left to the market to decide the capacity and cost provided during a disaster.

“The recent range of unfortunate events from the 2009 bushfires through to the floods and Cyclone Yasi saw the industry, and particularly the three primary carriers, respond as they do at considerable cost,” he said.

“When we send people into the field using a helicopter to refuel a base station to maintain connectivity our primary thought in doing that is completion of the end-to-end communications flow for emergency service management.”

“The industry does not go and do those things with the immediate moment in mind in terms of profit and bottom line.

“We are there to be in partnership with the ESOs to get communication system viable in times of stress so we can use it to best advantage.

“You can’t get away from the fact the this is a business and the carriers and industry are in business to make money however this goes to a higher relationship, I think.”

NBN an emergency services backbone

Althaus added that the National Broadband Network (NBN) would “undoubtedly” be part of the delivery of communications in future emergency services and would, with its fibre network, provide a complement to carriers’ mobile services.

“It is a backbone and very, very important backbone [for mobile services] given the sorts of volumes of data that are expected,” Althaus said.

Follow Tim Lohman on Twitter: @Tlohman

Follow Computerworld Australia on Twitter: @ComputerworldAU

Join the Computerworld Australia group on Linkedin. The group is open to IT Directors, IT Managers, Infrastructure Managers, Network Managers, Security Managers, Communications Managers.

More about: AMTA, Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association, etwork
References show all




seems like a sensible idea to overbuild a purpose built wireless emergency telecommunication network. Its not like it needs to shift gbps of data.

Seeing that the NBN itself is not particular protected (i.e. multiple routes for its POI's) it can hardly be relied on for 24/7 100% up availability.

Anyway Althaus your arguments are airy fairy. If the private market couldn't come up with a business case for FTTH (ROI of greater then 7%) then it would hardly be able to come up with one that has such a small pool of users.

Unless of course the private industry see this as a way to get some juicy government contract money.

Dave I.


Telstra & Optus did well to repair cell sites around Tully and Tully Heads after TC Yasi, but those of us in the SES carried on using the SES issued UHF radios we had. The repeater stations were not affected by the cyclone and so we had comms between towns.

Do emergency services need cellphone level services all the time? Probably not. Having priority access would be nice, but basic comms do work initially.

In Brisbane we use the Motorola Zeon managed TETRA system that the city council use. It works well for day to day operations and things like 'normal' storms and searches. There are still black spots where the 800MHz signal doesn't get into. 700MHz will be similar, so for many places VHF and 400-450MHz UHF will still be needed. It helps too if the control centre for a managed network is not affected by rising water during a flood too ...

Comments are now closed.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association (AMTA), AMTA Chris Althaus, spectrum, Chris Althaus, Telecommunications
All whitepapers

Mobile payments in Australia: state of the banks

Sign up now to get free exclusive access to reports, research and invitation only events.

Computerworld newsletter

Join the most dedicated community for IT managers, leaders and professionals in Australia