WA Health advancing Health Identifiers
- 05 August, 2011 12:00
- Comments 3
WA Health is to purchase a major chunk of the underlying software and services to facilitate the delivery of the national Health Identifiers initiative being managed by the National e-Health Transition Authority (NeHTA).
According to WA Health documents the agency will shortly procure software to provide an Enterprise Master Patient Index and an Enterprise Provider Index. Services include implementation and integration with other healthcare systems and data cleansing.
“The rollout of the [Health Identifiers] HI Solution will focus initially on public health providers,” the documents read. “The project will provide the technology, organisational capability and policy support to extend the solution subsequently to private providers.
“The solution will form a foundation for HIN [Health Information Network] programs such as Electronic Medical Records and Community Health Systems, and contribute to the rollout of National e-Health Transition Authority (NeHTA) standards and National IHIs [Individual Healthcare Identifiers] across all jurisdictions.
“Additionally, the HI Solution will be integrated with existing and proposed WA Health systems and interfaced with other providers’ systems and with the National Health Identifiers service.”
According to WA Health, the agency currently has more than 30 unrelated sources of patient and provider identification in use as a result of increases in the number of locations from which patients can access care, the diversification of health care delivery, and increases in the number of health care providers.
See our e-health landscape in Australia snapshot
As a result, some patients have to date been incorrectly identified leading to “adverse patient outcomes”, Reductions in the standard of health care provided and in clinicians’ ability to provide coordinated care, as well as clinician time being wasted managing and reconciling duplicate patient and provider records.
The Health Identifiers initiative is aimed at setting up nationally assigned unique numbers which identify a patient, a qualified person that provides health services or an organisation that provides health services.
Under the federal Healthcare Identifiers Act 2010 state health departments are required to implement a method of uniquely identifying patients and providers, in order to prepare for the national rollout of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR).
In addition to the PCEHR, Western Australia is also running its own WA Health Electronic Medical Records (EMR) program which requires the creation of a unique single source of patient and provider information.
The Health Identifier Solution will be a “critical enabling technology” to further local programs such as the state’s Patient Administration System (PAS), Clinical Information Systems (CIS) and the Electronic Medical Records (EMR) Program.
The initiative follows NeHTA’s coming under fire in late July from Liberal Senator for Queensland, Sue Boyce, for repeatedly failed to deliver projects on time.
Addressing attendees of the Technology in Health Administration Conference in Sydney, Boyce said NEHTA constantly changed goals, plans and deadlines to ensure that tracking its progress is almost impossible.
“To be blunt I don’t think they’ve done anything much ... except waste a lot of money and a lot of time,” Boyce said. “NEHTA loves a guiding principle, and a vision and a purpose and a mission it sometimes sounds more like a cult than a builder of anything.”
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
- How will CIOs meet growing Security Threats?
- Case Study: BNP Paribas Deploys Oracle Exadata to Accelerate Information Processing - The Hardware Perspective
- Top Reasons to Implement an SOA Governance Strategy: A List for IT Executives
- Risk management: ensuring the security of your hosted information
- Case Study: Danske Bank Group improves efficiency and reduces time to market
-
FTC chairman: Do-not-track law may not be needed
-
Kindle sales soar but Amazon mum on actual numbers
-
Wall Street Beat: IPOs, M&A, chip news stir tech optimism
-
Anonymous Takes Aim at Indian Government
-
Java creator: Fears over consequences of possible Oracle trial win may be overblown
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Office 2007 for Dummies
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Computers for Seniors for Dummies, 2nd Edition
-
Office 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
Microsoft Office
-
Windows 7 for Dummies®
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition









Comments
Nrip Nihalani
NeHTA's approach is too bureaucratic... It should look at first ensuring each physician, clinic and hospital has a website. Then mandate an EMR and then interconnect....
Napolean
Tim lots of quotations from WA Health but no names or titles - was it an interview or a press release? Was it the CIO or a cleaner? A spokesman or just a random report?
Would help put it in context, as we are all used to e-Health promises being light on detail and comments being recorded but virually untraceable.
Me
Napolean - the article states that the quotes come from documents, not a person
Post new comment