Windows 7 migrations raise app compatibility questions
- 08 February, 2011 15:18
- Comments 4
UK-based application compatibility software company App-DNA is to enter the Australian market by opening a Sydney office and Perth R&D centre, prompted by the belief that as much as 80 per cent of Australian enterprises have yet to migrate to Windows 7.
The company’s software is designed to analyse application deployments, assess their compatibility in different hardware and OS environments and automate the remediation of incompatibilities. According to App-DNA general manager, Glenn Parker, local desktop virtualisation and Windows XP to Windows 7 deployments projects were beginning to explode in the local market, prompting potential issues around application compatibility.
“I’m taken back by the level of activity I’m seeing,” he said. “It doesn’t mean it’s all happening right now, but of the [organisations] of 5000 seats or more, 80 per cent of those are in some kind of project or evaluation stage around Windows 7.”
According to Parker, organisations seeking to independently determine application compatibility when migrating hardware or OSes could spend up to 40 hours and $US1200 per application.
“To do that for an environment of 1000 or more applications would take many months, if not years so by automating that process you can reduce that time by up to 70 per cent,” he claimed.
While desktop virtualisation and Windows migrations were major drivers for software compatibility issues, moving in-house applications to a private or hybrid cloud was yet to emerge as a major driver for application compatibility testing.
“The bigger issues I see are things like IE6 to IE8 compatibility,” Parker said. “Some smaller organisations say they can manage a large portion of their Windows 7 issues but migration to IE8 is a problem for them.
“IE6 to IE8 is very, very manually intensive and very difficult for organisations to do [compatibility] testing with any level of accuracy.”
According to Parker, many enterprises have gone about developing custom, in-house Web applications to run on IE6 browsers, therefore compatibility patches to run on IE8 were essentially non-existent.
“That puts much more of the onus for compatibility testing on the organisation itself, and historically there may not have been good documentation or the developers who developed the application may not be there anymore,” he said.
Follow Tim Lohman on Twitter: @tlohman
Follow Computerworld Australia on Twitter: @ComputerworldAU
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
- Case Study - TNT Express successfully reduces their paper usage and costs using a new document solution
- TestPro achieves visibility over software defect management - Reducing project risk and improving quality
- Lower Your IT Costs When You Standardize on Oracle Database 11g
- Oracle Database 11g Product Family
- Top 10 Mistakes in Data Centre Operations: Operating Efficient and Effective Data Centers
-
Amazon Web Services personalizes CloudFront web hosting service
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Microsoft Official Academic Course
-
Certiprep Suite License Reg Card to Accompany Microsoft Office 2007 with Student CD-ROM and Six -Month Office Trial CD-ROM
-
Data Structures and Algorithms in Java 3E
-
Test ISBN for Kathy Collins Only
-
Mac OS X Panther for Dummies
-
Software Engineering, Volume 2
-
Beginning Active Server Pages 3.0
-
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 for Dummies
-
Web Development with the Mac









Comments
anonymous
Windows 7 is just like Vista. Tons of features removed and broken. Poor usability. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_features_removed_in_Windows_7 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_features_removed_in_Windows_Vista . Unnecessary GUI changes. It would be much more intelligent (and probably much harder to do) innovation to improve Windows without changing the GUI. But changing the cosmetics has mainly one purpose: to conceal, that nothing really new happened.
cyanna
I wonder how you use computers anonymous? If you were an IT professional you'd know of at least some of the technical changes under the surface. As a user you would have become familiar with some of the improvements in user interface and features. My personal favourites as a user: the task bar, libraries, the search function in Start. And Sticky notes, the detachable gadgets, Home group.......
As an IT enthusiast I try and teach people about shadow copies, per user DPI settings, virtual harddrives, bitlocker.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Features_new_to_Windows_7
Besides when you say the changes are purely cosmetic and nothing new happened, what exactly are you comparing to: XP? W2K? Windows 3.0?
Neil
@1, well I think Win 7 is quite good, works for me and seems stable enough.
Bruce
I would like to recommend two blogs about how to start with appcompat projects: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd835539(WS.10).aspx and also http://www.martin-nothnagel.net/blog/?lang=en
Post new comment