Anonymous 2009 pm.gov.au attack highlighted security risks: ASIO
- 21 October, 2010 16:57
- Comments 5
Anonymous’ distributed denial of service (DDOS) attacks on the website of the Australian Prime Minister late last year highlighted potential risks to Australia’s national security, according to the nation’s top spy agency, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO).
“The September 2009 Distributed Denial of Service attacks launched against government websites by an issue motivated group, 'Anonymous', demonstrated potential vulnerabilities of government websites that can be exploited to hamper government service delivery,” the agency stated in its 2009-10 annual report.
As reported by Computerworld Australia, the attack followed a ‘Declaration of War’ against the Australian government by Anonymous as a reprisal for its role in attempting to establish a mandatory ISP-level filter.
Detailing its work around cyber security, cyber espionage and cyber terrorism, ASIO director general, David Irvine, stated that technology and the forces of globalisation were the two principal drivers of its business modernisation.
“Countering terrorism is not ASIO's only continuing focus,” the report reads. “ASIO must also be highly capable within the cyber domain, working in close cooperation with the Defence Signals Directorate and the Attorney-General’s Department.
“Cyber espionage is an emerging issue, requiring considerable attention across Government to address both the criminal and public protection aspects, as well as counter-espionage and other defence elements.”
Irvine said the speed and scale of technological development presented significant challenges for organisations such as ASIO, demanding an increasing focus across all levels of government on both the technological and the legal bases of the telecommunications interception regime.
In response to these challenges, in 2010–11, ASIO would conduct a pilot study for the establishment of a National Interception Technical Assistance Centre, which would ultimately provide a central point for intelligence and law enforcement agencies to receive technical assistance to help keep pace with technological change in the digital age, Irvine said.
“For terrorists, the Internet is a well-established and essential tool, providing not only a platform to support operations, but a means by which terrorist and other groups can amplify their messages to a global audience,” the report reads.
“Most recently, al-Qa'ida and its affiliates have been using the Internet to mainstream their message and reach out directly to English speaking Muslims in western countries.”
Espionage had also thrived on globalisation and the communications revolution, Irvine said.
“Digitisation means that massive amounts of information can be extracted, transferred and shuffled with ease,” the report reads.
“A single well-placed human agent becomes the potential source of archives worth of intelligence. Hostile intelligence agencies now also have a ‘beyond-the-horizon’ capability; they need not leave their own shores to target information held on our government, business and even personal computers.”
The annual report also noted that ASIO received an equity injection of $16 million for 2009–10, to fund additional capability ($14m), telecommunications interception capabilities ($2m) and for ASIO's new headquarters ($589m).
The agency in its 2008-09 report confirmed that internet-based attacks have been used by hostile intelligence services to gain confidential Australian Government and business information.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
- INFORMATION FOR SUCCESS - Customers Achieve Extreme Performance at Lowest Cost with Oracle Exadata Database Machine
- CSO Security Buyers Guide 2011
- Key Considerations in Modernising Your Backup and Deduplication Solutions
- Securing SOA and Web Services with Oracle Enterprise Gateway
- Enabling Agile and Intelligent Businesses
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
Conroy turns the attack to Hockey
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Amazon Web Services personalizes CloudFront web hosting service
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Computers for Seniors for Dummies, 2nd Edition
-
Microsoft Office
-
Office 2007 for Dummies
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
Teach Yourself Visually Windows 7
-
Office 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies









Comments
Mitch
IT people would know the very nature of a DDOS attack means its not preventable, however, it can be countered by accommodating the flood caused by it, though, that's going to cost a lot.
Then again, I imagine that a non-organised group such as Anonymous would not necessarily have continuously large and stable DDOS attacks, it would vary depending on how many people are bored, frankly.
Andrew
ASIO's new headquarters ($589m).
Is that a typo? Very expensive headquarters.
James Hutchinson
@Andrew,
Thanks for the comment. It's definitely correct - the building was initially provided with $606 million in equity, but this was reduced in the last Federal Budget.
Anonymous
This as ridiculous as USA's passport watch-list that included a six year old. Most of Anonymous is made up of teens, some as young as 12. Trying to amplify the act as "cyberterrorism" is no different than calling ghandi a terrorist. Where the government should not have violated human rights(privacy, to information etc). That is the real threat. Following suit to USAs "Top secret Nation" behavior will simply lead Australia to the same fall that USA experiences over becoming a police state. If it really really bothers ASIO, then they should just turn their own computers off and stop wasting public money.
Louis Leahy
It is possible to defend against DDOS attacks. We have an Australian designed invention that does just that. We have been writing to the Australian Government about it for over a year now. It is very cost effective to implement and it certainly didn't cost $606m to develop. Despite our best efforts we have had no substantive response or review of our technology and have been dismissed out of hand or buck passed on each occasion by some of the most senior people in Government who simply fail to grasp the impact of our break through.
Post new comment