e-Health funding not enough: Victorian Department of Health
- 30 August, 2010 11:40
- Comments 3
The Federal Government's $446 million commitment to e-health is “not enough” and could deliver a "prototype" to sell the benefits of technology and healthcare, according to the Victorian Department of Health.
In the recently released budget papers, the documents for the health portfolio stated the sum would be spent over the next two years to “establish key components of the personally controlled electronic health record system”.
“This secure online system will enable improved access to healthcare information, commencing in 2012/13.” the documents said.
However, the allocated funding is not enough for a national rollout, Department of Health secretary, Fran Thorn, said last week at the health informatics conference in Melbourne.
“I believe the $500 million (sic) the Department of Health and Ageing has allocated to the e-health record trial is not enough for a full rollout across Australia and I'm not going to try to pretend that it is,” Thorn said.
The comments were made in response to a question from an audience member who asked about the possibility that in the next two years there could be a roll out of technology systems to support decision-making for healthcare professionals.
This wouldn't be achieved, she said, but there was scope to achieve this in future as part of the work to establish the healthcare identifier service, to electronically link patients' health records.
“At the moment we're setting up the foundations, we don't have the money we believe should be invested in e-health yet but we haven't given up hope yet,” Ms Thorn said.
“The money that has been allocated to DOHA to further significant e-health record trial will, as part of that have, over time, a decision support system... They are not interchangeable but are very closely related.
“In the national e-health strategy it does go into the idea of the development of what you could begin to structure as the foundations, then to a range of applications on top of that which are around the obvious.”
She said that the $446 million in funding could produce a suitable “protoype”, which could be used to sell the benefits of e-health.
“If we use the funding well, which we are required to do so, and not fritter it away but be very targeted in our approach of building the prototype case for this, then I think it would be impossible for anyone to continue to ignore what, in the end... is actually a very good investment."
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
- Prepare Your Enterprise for the Mobile Revolution: Boost the Bottom Line with Mobile UC
- Magic Quadrant for Managed Print Services, Worldwide
- Case Study: Svenska Kraftnät safeguards web and ensures communication security with Clearswift
- IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Business Process Platforms 2011 Vendor Analysis
- Virtual Certainty - Best Practices for Gaining Monitoring Clarity in VMware Environments
-
Amazon Web Services personalizes CloudFront web hosting service
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Microsoft Office
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Computers for Seniors for Dummies, 2nd Edition
-
Office 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Teach Yourself Visually Windows 7
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Office 2007 for Dummies









Comments
Phil
And why does Fran Thorn think that the Feds should fully fund the rollout. Health is a State responsibility but she want's to abrigate her responsibilities and the State's and grab the cash. MAke a sound argument to Treasury and get the State to chip in or is your credibility shot thatns to HealthSmart?
HealthSmart has been a dismal failure Fran. Why don't you fund that properly so that small hospitals don't just about go broke to implement 2 elements of a clinical system. With this track record and the Departments inept financial management of most IT projects it won't happen any time soon.
Arthur
It seems from Ms Thorn comments, that she is thinking in terms of getting the $447m spent *in Victoria* for a prototype of a full pcEHR.
$447m is enough money to roll out a *summary* pcEHR on a *national* basis, and then to work forward to a full pcEHR as experience with the summary EHR develops from actual use.
Of course if Mr Rabbit has his way, it will many years before we get any money for any sort "e" in Health, which would indeed be a disaster for Australian Health reform!
Harry Don Simon
Not sure how Ms Thorn could comment on this given Healthsmarts overspending and blatent defensive strategies against a federal model and even local state initiatives like cenitex maybe if healthsmart didnt waste million replicating the ETS project they could focus on delivering health not IT outcomes.
Post new comment