NBN speeds not necessary for healthcare identifier service
- 27 August, 2010 11:07
- Comments 3
The Labor government's proposed $43 billion national broadband network (NBN) isn't necessary for the rollout of the health record identifiers, according to the head of the National eHealth Transition Authority (NEHTA).
The comments were made at the health informatics conference on Tuesday, when ABC's Tony Jones moderated an e-health discussion with five industry representatives.
When Jones quizzed the panel about the need for the NBN, NEHTA CEO Peter Fleming said a reliable internet connection – not faster speeds - was the most significant requirement for the implementation of the healthcare identifier service (a system where a unique 16-digit number will be used to electronically link a patient's health records).
In this context, he said it didn't matter whether the reliability was delivered as part of the Labor government's proposed NBN or another project.
“The first thing from our perspective it isn't the bandwidth, it's the reliability, particularly if you go to remote regions, or indigenous communities, reliability becomes all-important,” Fleming said.
“There's no point in having a clinical system that's dependent on communication and information if you can't have a reliable system.
“Whether that's the NBN or some other system, reliability is important... what we're delivering today does not need huge bandwidth.”
However, once the healthcare identifier system is in place, he said this could facilitate applications that require the 100Mbps internet speeds, which the Labor government has promised to be delivered with the $43 billion NBN.
“As you look at the implementation of the e-health record and then what you can do with it as you start to roll out health management systems, the demands of bandwidth will increase substantially.
“There is a need for substantial bandwidth requirement as we move forward into the future, the immediate requirement is reliability.”
The sentiment was echoed by health information society of Australia president Michael Legg, who was previously a NBN-sceptic but believes it could facilitate significant improves in healthcare, especially in rural and remote communities.
“I am a supporter of the NBN, and I wasn't earlier in the piece. I think we can do a hell of a lot without the NBN, we all recognise that,” Legg said.
“One of the things we forget is what can happen when you have these things available to you... I'm absolutely convinced we would change and change faster if we had the NBN in place. Especially remote care, there's a massive difference.”
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
- Enterprise Buyers Guide for Cloud Storage
- Why Hackers have Turned to Malicious JavaScript Attacks
- A Technical Overview of the Oracle Exadata Database Machine and Exadata Storage Server
- Email Encryption/Decryption and Signing integrated into a comprehensive content security solution
- Pathways Business Brochure 2012
-
Amazon Web Services personalizes CloudFront web hosting service
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Microsoft Office
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Computers for Seniors for Dummies, 2nd Edition
-
Office 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Teach Yourself Visually Windows 7
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Office 2007 for Dummies









Comments
Richard Ure
eHealth now could be building up an historical file of medical events now, after all NBN won't be ubiquitous for at least 8 years anyway so this observation is arcane in one sense.
Neil Walker
Mahesh, why emphasize the short term negative, "NBN speeds not necessary for healthcare identifier service", when the more visionary and illuminated view of Michael Legg in your last three paragraphs, should have been the title? That was the real story. Change from skeptic to seeing the potential. Is this just the traditional journalistic practise that negativity sells?
miketaxpayer
oh dear, The NBN was not not needed. Never was. Take 8 years anyway. They do need something but its today mm, and reliable - eg perhaps a number of commercial or private alternatives that are financial and resilent. Not a fixed fibre POI with visible data contending with everything else on a fragile non duplicated monopolised, part bandwith comms link.
Something like the alternative proposals which will arrive at increasingly frequency as the ill fated Conroy/Quigley debacle dies under the evidence of waste and incompetence.
DId the NBN ever consult or have a stakeholder and business plan ? NOPE.
All that puff and video doctors and so on. Conrou and Gillard pressing big fake buttons and 'switching it on'
$40b spare now for real health and other real needs.
Plently of room for some health comms in that.
Post new comment