Professor Rod Tucker on access technologies in the broadband policies
- 16 August, 2010 07:47
- Comments 8
What are the key differences between the broadband access technologies being offered by the major political parties and what impact will the choice of technology have on the potential for future upgrades? To answer this question, it useful to divide the main competing access technologies into two main classes: Shared and dedicated.
1. Shared Access Technologies
Shared access technologies spread the available network capacity among all users. The more users, the less bandwidth is available per user.
Imagine a number of people scattered around a large room. If there are not too many people in the room, people can talk to each other. But as more people come into the room, communication the room becomes more and more difficult because the “sound waves” become congested.
Wireless access networks suffer the same problem. The electromagnetic spectrum used by wireless is limited, and as more users share the available wireless spectrum, the experience of all users is degraded.
Some wireless carriers have touted access rates of up to 50 Mbps and more. But this is achievable only if no-one else is using the spectrum. An alternative is to erect very large numbers of wireless base stations so that only a few people use each base station. Do you want wireless base stations down your street?
Another shared access technology is hybrid fibre coax (HFC). Telstra and Optus pass approximately 2 million homes in Melbourne and Sydney with HFC networks.
Some parts of these networks are currently being upgraded to higher bit rate. The recent upgrades to Telstra’s HFC network provide peak download speed of around 100 Mbps.
However, in HFC networks, the available bandwidth on the coaxial cable is shared by a number of users in the street. The more people using the network, the lower is the bandwidth per user.
In addition, HFC networks are asymmetric, and upload bandwidths are lower that download bandwidths. Upload bandwidths suffer badly when other users are uploading data. HFC technology is nearing its maximum potential.
It is unlikely that there will be large improvements in HFC technology in the future.
2. Dedicated Access Technologies
The big advantage of dedicated access technologies is that they don’t degrade as more users connect to the network.
ADSL is one such access technology. The beauty of ADSL is that it squeezes a lot of bandwidth out of a pair of copper wires.
And because these copper wires can be easily accessed in the telephone exchange, there is plenty of opportunity for competition between service providers who can either rent capacity on the equipment in the exchange (DSLAMs) from the owner of the telephone exchange, or install their own DSLAMs.
But despite its remarkable ability to provide broadband over copper pairs, the upstream bandwidth in ADSL is lower than the downstream bandwidth and the upstream and downstream bandwidths are lower for homes that are located further from the telephone exchange. Advances in ADSL technologies seem to be reaching a limit, so don’t expect any big improvements.
The majority of customers of the Government’s proposed NBN will be connected using a fibre-to-the-premises (FTTP) network based on gigabit passive optical network (GPON) technology delivering a dedicated 100 Mbps to the home.
A fibre from the telephone exchange is connected to a user modem in each home, and the modem is connected to the home network.
The capacity of FTTP technology is virtually unlimited. In fact, the capacity of a single optical fibre is more than 10,000 times the capacity of the entire wireless electromagnetic spectrum.
As it happens, just last week, NBNCo announced that upgrades to 1 Gbps are on the way.
And future upgrades to even higher rates are coming. FTTP is the ultimate future-proof technology and a natural choice for the NBN.
Finally, I need to stress that wireless and fibre access technologies are compatible and will live alongside each other. Lower-bandwidth wireless access will continue to provide broadband access combined with mobility and flexibility. High-capacity fibre-based broadband will provide the platform for many new high-bandwidth broadband services. Together, mobile wireless and fixed fibre broadband will transform the way we live and do business.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
-
Amazon Web Services personalizes CloudFront web hosting service
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Office 2007 for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Teach Yourself Visually Windows 7
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
Microsoft Office
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Computers for Seniors for Dummies, 2nd Edition
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Dummies®









Comments
Brian Stevens
I see a lot of statements from people about access speed, but what about throughput and delay?
If the NBN doesnt give close to wirespeed throughput (all the time) and sub millisec delays (all the time), wants the point?
If NBN is like ADSL2+ where if you get 900Kbits out of a 20Mbits throughput (less than 5%) it is considered "usable" then regardless of the headline speed wont be any better that the "alternative" technology options being touted
BA
What a refreshing change to have a clear statement about NBN technologies from someone who knows what they're talking about.
Is the price to pay for democracy that we must suffer the consequences of decisions made by the uninformed?
Daniel
"The Internet should not be limited by design of copper wires from 100 years ago" - paraphrased.
Optic Fibre to the premise, and good wireless options for mobility.
That's what's needed.
It takes a long time to get this done. The longer the co-alition makes us wait, the longer Australia will have to wait.
B
@Brian:
You make a good point. Throughput and delay can indeed effect on the quality of an internet connection.
With ADSL, a digital signal must be converted to analog for transmission over the wire. Also, interleaving adds to the latency. This means that delay with ADSL is somewhat high.
In addition, the high "bit error rate" in ADSL causes a significant reduction in throughput, while adding jitter (variations in latency).
GPON, which is the technology that will be used in the NBN, travels at the speed of light. It also does not need to be converted to analog for transmission.
The result is that the latency and jitter are both much lower compared to ADSL.
Also, since the transmission has fewer errors than ADSL, the throughput is not reduced by retransmitted packets, which means throughput and jitter will be better than ADSL.
Ben
The biggest issue with the Co-alition's plan is how short term it is. ADSL and wireless will improve. But there is an upper limit to what they can do. NBN is a plan for at least the next two decades. Sure at the moment no one may be after 100mb/s speeds. 20 years from now when everyone is watching 3D TV via the internet, cars have internet access for passengers (via wifi to backboned base stations) and it's uncommon for someone not to have a permanent online presence, people will be either praising the NBN for amazing foresight or cursing the lack of decent plan when it would have made a difference.
Boofhead
Do the maths professor. GPON at a maximum 2.5Gbps downstream with a 1:32 split does not allow a dedicated 100Mbps to the home for every user on the PON. Subtract the bandwidth used for multicast traffic (IPTV) and it gets worse! GPON is also asymetrical at only 1.2Gbps upstream. NBN Co offering 1Gbps on GPON is a waste as the PON capacity is easily exhausted....that is if anybody today could use it.
Richard Ure
@Boofhead,
And your point is? There will always be an element of sharing in this business... it's just a question of howbig the cake to be shared is.
Sammy
Please wake up, Prof Rob. Wirless can archieve 1Gb/s as well when GPON to home with 1Gb/s. Can every labtop at home get 1Gb/s at home without WiFi or you have to pay extra wired at home.
Post new comment