Coalition to spend $90 million on PC-based content filtering and cyber-safety program
- 11 August, 2010 09:20
- Comments 3
A Coalition Government will spend $90 million on PC-based Internet filtering software and the expansion of Australian Communication and Media Authority’s (ACMA) cyber-safety outreach program.
Speaking at the Australian Computer Society’s (ACS) ICT Policy Forum with Labor Senator Stephen Conroy and Greens Senator Scott Ludlam, shadow communications minister, Tony Smith, announced the program for the first time in retaliation to the Government’s proposed mandatory ISP-level filter.
Smith said a Coalition Government would provide funding of $60 million over four years to reintroduce the PC-based filtering software previously implemented by the Howard Government.
The $85 million NetAltert scheme, introduced in 2007 by the Howard Government, was widely criticised by the industry for being easily surpassable, and promptly dropped by the Rudd Government following the Federal election.
“We don’t say PC based filters are foolproof but we do say they offer a more comprehensive and sensible solution for parents,” Smith said.
On the topic of cyber-crime issues, Smith said there was no substitute for active engagement and education.
He described ACMA’s cyber-safety outreach program, which delivers face-to-face presentations to audiences of students, parents and teachers free of charge, “a great success”.
The Coalition will commit $30 million dollars in additional funding to extend and expand the program and provide an advice hotline, "so parents have a first point of call when they have technical issues or queries,” Smith said.
After months of keeping quiet on the topic of the net filter, Shadow Treasurer, Joe Hockey, pre-empted news of the Coalition's policy by saying the parties would jointly block Labor’s mandatory internet filtering policy in parliament, potentially killing the project even if Julia Gillard wins the Federal election.
In July, Senator Conroy, announced a deal between Telstra, Optus, iPrimus and the Federal Government, that would see up to 70 per cent of Australians receive filtered Internet access for child pornography material. The Government's initial plans to implement a mandatory ISP-level filter for all Refused Classification material would be delayed for a year, pending a review of the system by the Classification Board. The decision produced mixed reactions from politicians, industry and lobbyists.
In the same month, telecoms providers and Internet advocate groups criticised the proposed ISP-level filter, calling for more funding to educate the Australian Federal Police and state law enforcement on lawful data interception and cyber-safety instead. Conroy told the ICT Policy Forum this week that those elements were at the top of his agenda on cyber-safety.
The Cyber Safety Committee roundtable, held in Melbourne in July, also saw evidence provided by the Greens and the Opposition as further reason for the Federal Government to drop its controversial mandatory ISP-level filter.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
- EMC 15-Minute Guide to Smarter Backup Transform your future
- Seven Steps to Effective Data Governance
- CISO Guide to Next Generation Threats - Combating Advanced Malware, Zero-Day and Targeted APT Attacks
- Automating Your Processes to Outperform Your Competition
- Consolidating Applications with Oracle Solaris Containers
-
Amazon Web Services personalizes CloudFront web hosting service
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
Teach Yourself Visually Windows 7
-
Office 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Computers for Seniors for Dummies, 2nd Edition
-
Office 2007 for Dummies
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Windows 7 for Dummies®









Comments
gnome
You say that NetAlert was criticised by "industry" for being easily bypassable, but it seemed that, then as now, much of the criticism came from various sources who had a commercial barrow to push.
On-PC filtering which can be set by parents to reflect their preferences for their own family is far better than the imposition of secret State censorship being peddled by Conboy & Co.
Once kids are old enough to learn about bypassing filters, they will know how to get around ISP level filters as well, despite what the hopeful filter vendors may claim.
Matt Munro
No Filter will be effective, a College I'm associated with recently caught students that had setup their own php proxy site. If they'd done a couple more clever things like run it over https and not downloaded massive files through it, we may never had noticed it.
The funniest bit, the students had set it up to bypass home filtering, then realised if it worked for home maybe it'd work at school.
Filters are good to stop accidental viewing of undesired material, they will not stop a determined user that has a least 2 functioning brain cells
Ronin8317
90 million? There are open source web content filters which are FREE, why does the Coalition want to pay 90 million for it?
Post new comment