Gillard Government actively considering IT portfolio
- 28 July, 2010 12:06
- Comments 26
The Gillard Government is believed to be “actively considering” an IT portfolio and accompanying minister, should it win Government on 21 August.
The portfolio would consolidate some of the responsibilities currently under the lead of the existing Minister for Finance and Deregulation, Lindsay Tanner, as well as the Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research, Kim Carr. It would complement the existing Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy portfolio currently headed by Senator Stephen Conroy, and look to encourage the development of the IT industry, with a focus on government engagement and online services.
Tanner has announced he will quit Parliament following the election. Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, refused to comment on a possible replacement until after the election.
The second Howard cabinet added IT responsibilities to the communications portfolio under “Communications, Information Technology and the Arts,” led by then Senator Helen Coonan until the 2007 federal election. However, since the Labor Government won power in 2007, various aspects of responsibilities pertaining to the IT industry have been disaggregated into at least three different portfolios.
The Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy largely pertains to the existing telecommunications industry as well as aspects relating to consumer protection and the Internet, particularly the Government’s National Broadband Network (NBN) and a mandatory ISP-level Internet filter.
The Department of Finance and Deregulation’s Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO) has assumed responsibility of some of the “harder” aspects of IT, including those recommendations outlined in the Gov 2.0 Taskforce report on government engagement, and the consolidation of IT procurement and assets outlined by the Gershon report released last year.
Carr’s Innovation, Industry, Science and Research portfolio is largely focussed around the research and development aspects of the ICT industry, including the Government’s proposed tax concessions pertaining to software development, and IP Australia.
Some in the IT industry, as well as the media, have suggested the possibility of instating an overarching IT ministry to consolidate some of these responsibilities, with campaigns supporting Labor ACT senator, Kate Lundy, for the role. One media report suggested a reevaluation of the portfolio divisions was certain, should Labor succeed in winning Government.
Lundy told Computerworld Australia that it was no secret she would appreciate being given such a role but that it was “the leader's call on where it sits in that relative policy".
“I'd encourage it to be considered as an option,” Lundy said. “I'm sure it is actively considered as an option.
“I think part of the issue is that the ministers are all doing a terrific job in that area, so whether or not it warrants an emphasis over and above the other priorities of government, that really comes back to the Prime Minister's decision.”
A spokesperson for Julia Gillard refused to confirm or deny speculation on the ministry.
“The Prime Minister is focussed on the election and her positive plans for the future,” they said.
“We will not be getting ahead of ourselves by speculating about portfolios in a possible future Government.”
Some have pointed to Lundy’s husband, David Forman, as a potential point of conflict. Forman founded anti-Telstra telecommunications alliance, the Competitive Carriers’ Coalition (CCC), in 2001, and was executive director there until recently. It is believed he left the group in March to work at consulting firm and lobbying group, CPR. Lundy confirmed that CCC remained a client of CPR, but said that all of his interests and business relations had been fully disclosed.
David Forman was not available for comment at time of writing.
Australian Industry Information Association (AIIA) chief executive officer, Ian Birks, said the current distribution of IT-related responsibilities was “siloed” into separate departments.
“There isn’t a lot of communication between the Department of Innovation and Industry, and the Department of Broadband and the other key sector portfolios like health, education and energy,” Birks said.
Instead of a specific IT ministry, the industry group has been lobbying for a productivity portfolio that would work in a cross-government sense to provide a focal point for application of technologies in varied sectors.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
-
Amazon Web Services personalizes CloudFront web hosting service
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Microsoft Office
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Dummies®
-
Computers for Seniors for Dummies, 2nd Edition
-
Office 2007 for Dummies
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Office 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies









Comments
Raymond
Of course they will consider IT and NBN, they have to find a weasel word way to dump most of NBN, even these imbeciles now understand they cannot burden so much debt over and above the $100 million per day being borrowed.
Bye Bye NBN
Jim
The NBN has to be dumped. We cannot afford another $43 billion worth of debt to built infrastructure that will be obsolete before it goes into the ground.
RS
Sing the Liberal theme song, stand and salute, then let the idiocy and FUD flow #1 and 2.
Oh sorry, you just did...
Debt... the current government have said they will have us back in surplus to the tune of $3.5b in 2012/13 - gee two years.... The Liberals haven't said when they will do so, as yet, because presumably with the cuts they are suggesting, it will be sooner than 2012/13. Obviously thay don't want to say this, simply because it will put an end to the debt FUD lies (like those above)...being spread by the faithful minions.
Obsolete...LOL. That's all that needs to be said.
Raymond
Oh dear, you poor moronic imbecile...here is your 101 lesson in economics, now pay attention you fool.
When the government says they will have the "budget" back into surplus...now pay attention fool... THAT MEANS... they actually have a little bit of money surplus to begin paying back the debt.
So fool, in 2113 they will have $3.5 to begin paying by that stage, $220bill which means JUNE 30TH 2113 the debt will be$216.5 BILLION you bloody moron
Raymond
@ # 3 you are so now humiliated just slither away LOL, LOL LOL you pompus fool LOL, LOL
RS
Humiliated for telling it as it is, LOL.
OMG Raymond you are a goose beyond compare. Nice figures, but not what I said...
Read my lips stupid, "the government have said they will have us back in surplus in 2013" (not 2113).
And this is exactly what the government have said. Nothing more and nothing less. All your FUD isn't working...
You ought to try it (no not kissing the mirror you do that 24/7)... using facts for a change.
Raymond
Agreed imbecile, made a typo,2013,was just so excited about humiliating you,still don't get it do you,it means the budget NOT the debt, so we do it again, I will use little numbers slowly for you, if you owe the bank $220 and you finally get a job and earn $3.50 you still owe the bank $216.50 see how it works!
RS
LOL, settle goose…
Raymond in your haste to try and get just one solitary victory, after all your ego shattering defeats (due to your perpetually WRONG and contradictory claims, LOL) you have again jumped the gun and shown yourself to be quite the irrational and hot-headed dunce, lol…
I note the desperation, with every comment, how you beg me to leave (as I keep embarrassing you). You even begged the editors to ban me because I forever disprove your lies, lol and look here again. Anyway…
Rest assured I understand the difference between (budget) deficit/surplus and soverign debt Raymond.
So let me put my simple reference to (the governments claims) “surplus” and your “ridiculous reply to the entire debt scenario” into words you can understand.
What I said was one of the Wiggles wears yellow (something you know well). Your reply then said, fool there’s a yellow Wiggle, blue Wiggle, red Wiggle, etc.
Yes Raymond, there are lots of nice colourful Wiggles, but one of them is, as I said, yellow…
Raymond
I have done you like the big Turkey you are...slowly, now LOL Off
You are damaged goods, going cheap, no value!
Go away you dumb fraud
D Newman
Wait for it, Wait for it new personna incoming....is it going to be Legal Eagle or a call centre style, Mike,Steve or Jeff funny he never does a female name, so so much insercurity.
Raymond please come back you were winning that debate, no honest you were, by the way which member of the Wiggles do you have above your bed, or is it the much more in keeping with your thought proccess "Dorothy the Dinosaur" poster.
However seeing as in elections the whole leadership thing is played out to the lowest common denominator, where change and fear are peddled to people with no clue about much more than is shown on channel 7 news, Raymond does end up being a weather vane, to the couch potatoes and the great unwashed.
Dear Lord help us.
RS
Raymond… seriously!
Not even you could possibly be that stupid and sans perception. Could you?
Could you not even comprehend the Wiggles analogy? Hello Raymond, yoo-hoo the light is on, but…yet you still bask in this non-existent glory, lol!
Instead of frothing at the mouth, surely you now realise what a complete dolt you were with your typical moronic comments above. OMG! It just shows how pig-headed and ridiculously biased you are, as you continue to perceive information as you wish it to be, not as it is!
Isn’t that horrible realisation hitting home to you that, in the essence of our correspondence, we are actually saying the same thing. Just you are coming from the glass half empty angle, whereas I am coming from the glass half full. Let me spell it out for those still not clued up enough to read between the lines.
By bringing the budget back into surplus in 12/13, do you really believe the incurred NBN debt of $43b – actually claimed to be less here -
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/business/a/-/tech/7655521/nbn-co-boss-claims-network-costs-fluid/
will take multiple generations to repay, as the peddlers of FUD keep claiming? I say no, you apparently say yes.
But then you also say the NBN will never be built, even though it already has clientele, LOL!!!
D Newman
Professor joseph stiglitz a nobel prize winner on economics, Raymond look him up on his views of Australian debt, start with his lateline interview.....
Then once you have learnt off a man who knows about such matters, and not from a party who have not been able to supply correct shadow budget figures the last 3 attempts, and I will give you a hint its wasnt Labour.
The whole budget and debt thing is utter rubbish and only accounts for 6% of Australian GDP, there are western countries saddled with 10 times that, you are truely clueless on this matter and should just shut up, as my 2 year old daughter has more crediblty on this matter than you.
D Newman
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2010/s2965891.htm just to make it even easier for you raymond, here is the link, references to Australia are 1/3 down.
D Newman
Been told that would be to hard for you to do, Raymond, so here is the highlight for you.
KERRY O'BRIEN: I'm not sure how much you know about Australia's stimulus packages in response to the crisis, but to the extent that you do, how did the quality of Australia's stimulus compare with that in the US and elsewhere, in terms of its effectiveness?
JOSEPH STIGLITZ: I did actually study quite a bit the Australian package, and my impression was that it was the best - one of the best-designed of all the advanced industrial countries. When the crisis struck, you have to understand no-one was sure how deep, how long it would be. There was that moment of panic. Rightfully so, because the whole financial system was on the verge of collapse. In that context, what you need to act is decisively. If you don't act decisively, you could get the collapse. It's a one-sided risk.
KERRY O'BRIEN: There's been a lot of criticism of waste in the way some of Australia's stimulus money was spent. Is it inevitable if you're going to spend a great deal of government money quickly that there will be some waste and can you ever justify wasting taxpayers' money?
JOSEPH STIGLITZ: If you hadn't spent the money, there would have been waste. The waste would have been the fact that the economy would have been weak, there would have been a gap between what the economy could have produced and what it actually produced - that's waste. You would have had high unemployment, you would have had capital assets not fully utilised - that's waste. So your choice was one form of waste verses another form of waste. And so it's a judgment of what is the way to minimise the waste. No perfection here. And what your government did was exactly right. So, Australia had the shortest and shallowest of the downturns of the advanced industrial countries. And, ah, your recovery actually preceded the - in some sense, China. So there was a sense in which you can't just say Australia recovered because of China. Your preventive action, you might say pre-emptive action, prevented the downturn while things got turned around in Asia, and they still have not gotten turned around in Europe and America.
End of the day 6% GDP Debt is one of the worlds best at present.
Daniel
""The Study confirms that the NBN business model establishes that taxpayers are paid back their investment with a modest return by year 15 of the project on the basis that privatisation is completed."
It's an 'investment' in the nations future. What kind of people would reject this? Those that don't really have a vision, or don't care about Australia's future!
Daniel
I know this is off subject, for the article that is, not the comments, but here it is...
"The $43 billion total capital cost of the NBN is a conservative estimate and there are opportunities to significantly reduce the build cost."
"The peak investment required by Government is estimated at $26 billion by the end of year 7".
Raymond
My dear rock slithers and resident imbecile,is the best you can come up with is Kerry O'brien and some opinions from people who are meaningless. You poors hallow,true believers! Come into the real world of building these things, deal with Telstra, frustrating what goes on in exchanges around australia,wonder who was part of the whistle blowing to get Telstra fined by ACCC, the only decent case they have run.You simply have no idea of real world!
Get with the real world,investment capital to this country is drying up because of the uncertainty of the mining tax,nobody is going to invest in NBN should it ever get up, or any other major project. Here are the facts of real world life. The concept of NBN is great...NOT NOW! we cannot afford it,like all telco infrastructure around the world, to phase in over time against a business model, now that I want to invest in.
However, it will not happen for some time to come,for those of you who are simplke service desk people working shift, deal with it, you are not going to get your toy, super fast broadband..well, not yet!
RS
Thanks D. Newman, very informative indeed… Informative for those unlike the “ignorant inbred” of course!
Those, who are willing to listen, learn and don’t think they already know it all. I see he is even now hinting that he was instrumental in having fines handed out to Telstra! What a guy, lol…!
Unfortunately, reality strangely doesn’t matter to the ignorant. As such, this information has already simply been shrugged off, because it does not fit within the limited guidelines set out at Liberal party HQ. Plus it’s obviously, overloading the limited intelligence levels of the blindly biased.
You see; the ignorant inbred (I.I to his friends) already told me in another CW thread previously, that Australia didn’t even have a financial crisis, at all. Because we ‘waz digging’ up stuff from the grownd’…
I.I your above comment (apart from the typical opening) for once, in parts, made sense, was creditable to a degree and you even put your point across, somewhat succinctly. Did aunt/mum, write most of it for you?
So without all the typical non-sense, you have shown that you possibly can actually make topical points. Now if only you could extend those guidelines and lessen the fierce bias, you could almost pass as human!
bruiser
I wish the Government would can the NBN and spend $43b on renewable energy instead. There would be no need for a carbon tax then and we may actually have clean air and enough power to run our businesses and internet. If you want download/upload speed, go wireless.
Raymond
Newman, you had better concerntrate on the help desk, you are going to be replaced by a Kiwi!
RS
So back to the topic...
A while back over at ZD, when everyone was saying bring in Lundy and get rid of Conroy, I made an off-the-cuff remark saying - they could always make Conroy Minister for National Communications Infrastructure (i.e. the NBN Minister) and bring in Lundy to oversee the rest.
Because, for all the names Conroy is called, I believe (and before the usual ignorant inbred Liberal starts - I am entitled to an opinion) he has done a pretty good job with the NBN and especially... dealing with Telstra. The rest, meh...
He's the first Minister to actually dethrone Telstra and make them act. Forcing ADSL2+ switch on, new products, cheaper plans (so cheap the others are now whinging) and even agree to voluntary separation and NBN inclusion, etc, So...
Then bring in Lundy to offer a more knowledgable approach to ICT and a more rational approach to what seems inevitable in some form, regardless of the governments persuasion... Internet filtering.
Raymond
We all know when the desperate are on thin ice,they resort to self praise,poor driviling creature!
RS
@22 dearest ignorant inbred...
I see after many attempts you finally worked it out. Did aunt/mum, draw you a pic? How embarrassing for one so narcissistic, to carry on like a complete goose, only to later realise it was all for nothing, LOL....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes I.I, best if you change the topic, reflect blame away from your own lack of intelligence and pretend it all never occurred, LOL.
Agreed however with you off topic comment, re #22. So as you have again laid the foundation...
Please tell us again about, how you single handely fined Telstra $18.55m.
How you amassed your fortune, LOL!!!!
Tell us again, how the NBN will never be built, because you said. Oh sorry it won't be built now because of a change of government.
Tell us again how the NBN (yes, the one that will never be built but already has clientele) will use satellite and wireless for sure!
Tell again us about your yacht (and the rubber duck) and any other bath toys you have (no we don't need to hear about the one you play with the most, in the bath).
My favourite, tell us again about Phar Lap (LOL), I enjoyed that one!
But gee, you forgot to beg me to leave or beg the editor to ban me, because I keep humiliating you...
Never mind, I'm sure you can be prescribed with some sort of chronic liar,cretinism mediaction, I.I.
Raymond
Funny what tune the imbeciles come when called,however#23 if you think that is you then,How do you think the election is going, Julia wants NBN, and Tony will kill it! who do you think is in front, who is a landslide in front!
Still want to back NBN.....moron
D Newman
@RAymond lol, thanks for your concern for me and my furniture, been busy of late, but thanks for asking, bless ya wee cotton socks.
Sadly its the Kiwis that are going to suffer, not very many as so much was out sourced, and their overseas call centre 6 month window for migration over to "MY" humble desk and some new "Beachheads" to play with.
Hows life in the "2 foot Trenches" treating you Raymond.
RS
@24. You call me imbecile and moron, LOL and more fittingly, I refer to you aptly as ape and Ignorant Inbred, so lets's evaluate eh?
Hmmm...so it seems we have something (returning here to reply to each other) in common after all…
But, let’s not forget, I never said I wouldn’t correspond with you further…as you did me, when you realised early on that you were clearly out of your depth. But still, you can’t control yourself, and that little boy ego of yours desperately searches for just one victory, LOL! Either that or you are a chronic liar! I’d say both…
Anyway, although we have one thing in common, the big difference between us is, “unlike you”, I don’t: -
Big note myself
Look down at anyone (except you I.I)
Lie about yachts and racehorses
Claim to be a multi-billionaire
Make stupid prophecies that when found false, deny or desperately try to change words…LOL!!!!
Plus unlike you, I am not any of the following: -
Too small to admit I was wrong - when one’s wrong, one’s wrong, no good pretending otherwise
Too small to apologise when wrong - when one’s wrong, an apology is appropriate
Unwilling to listen/accept others with alternate views
Unable to post a comment without referring to others as imbeciles and morons
A slave to a political party - I can think for myself, not have a political party think for me
Selfish/Greedy/Narcissistic
A chronic liar/completely FOS…
I want an NBN not for me (I have ADSL2+/100GB which is fine) but because it is needed by others, both now and in the future. Thinking of others, I know is a foreign concept to one, like you, so conceited.
Ooh I almost forgot and most importantly, unlike you, my mother is not my dad’s sister… !
Seems we don’t have much in common after all. You are here for the tempting bananas I dangle in front of you, which you can’t resist and also here to attempt the impossible – “a solitary victory”. Where as I am here because I love toying with fools, and you fool… are my new toy! What a team we make eh? LOL!!!!!!!!!
Post new comment