Goodbye Kin, Sidekick and 'social phones'
- 03 July, 2010 08:04
If there's any correlation between the recently killed Kin and discontinued T-Mobile Sidekick -- aside from Microsoft having a hand in both discontinued phones -- it's that they tried to distinguish themselves from both high-powered smartphones and simpler feature phones.
That idea will soon become irrelevant, and here's why:
Social networking is clearly a hot trend in smartphones. Palm's WebOS phones led the pack with Synergy, a program that lumps contacts from e-mail, messaging applications and social networks into one view, while also merging instant messages and SMS into a single feed. Then came Motorola's Motoblur, a user interface that merged Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and other networks into a single feed on the homescreen.
Now, it seems like everyone's getting on board. HTC's Sense interface gained Friend Stream, whose function is self-explanatory. Motorola's Droid X won't back Motoblur specifically, but something like it. Down the line, you'll see Windows Phone 7's People Hub, a running feed of status updates and photos from friends. Even the buttoned-up BlackBerry is joining the fun, as the BlackBerry 6 operating system will include a "social networking feeds" application.
The problem is that smartphones require expensive data plans that turn off people who want less. The Kin, which Microsoft called a "social phone," was an outright failure largely because its US$30 monthly data plan didn't sync with the Kin's lack of features. The Sidekick had special price tiers that included data and text, and it had a long and healthy run -- last year's data snafu notwithstanding.
Increasingly, it's becoming possible to get a smartphone for the same monthly cost as a Sidekick. Earlier this month, AT&T put an end to unlimited smartphone data plans, but it also introduced a low price tier of $15 per month for 200 MB of data. That's not ideal for watching video or streaming music, but it can certainly handle Facebook and Twitter, thereby making smartphones more accessible than ever. Other networks may follow AT&T; Verizon is already considering it.
Even if T-Mobile gives the next generation of Sidekicks a special monthly rate, it won't look much different than the low price tier AT&T offers. Therefore it'll have to compete with all other social network-friendly smartphones. So I'm not surprised that a rumored follow-up to the Sidekick, said to be coming in May and called the "Sidekick Twist," sounds a lot like a smartphone, with Android 2.1, a 1 GHz processor and 4.3-inch Super AMOLED display.
To put it all another way, the line between smartphone and feature phone is blurring, and phones that try to split the difference will get lost in the obscurity.
Join the Computerworld Australia group on Linkedin. The group is open to IT Directors, IT Managers, Infrastructure Managers, Network Managers, Security Managers, Communications Managers.
- Microsoft Kills the Kin - PCWorld
- T-Mobile to Stop Selling Current Sidekicks - PCWorld
- Palm Pre Phone Review - PCWorld
- Motorola Cliq Adds Social Features to Android OS Handset - PCWorld
- First Look: HTC's New Smartphones and Sense User Interface - PCWorld
- The Droid X does not have Motoblur : Android Central
- Windows Phone 7: An In-depth Look at the Features and Interface - PCWorld
- A Sneak Peek at BlackBerry 6 OS - PCWorld Business Center
- Microsoft Introduces 'social Phone,' Kin - PCWorld
- Why Microsoft's Kin Phones Were Destined to Fail - PCWorld
- Sidekick Data Loss: T-Mobile's Unending Nightmare - PCWorld
- AT&T Pulls the Plug on Its Unlimited Data Plans - PCWorld
- Verizon Hints at Following AT&T to End Unlimited Data Plans - PCWorld Business Center
- Project Emerald Details Emerge, Possible Sidekick Successor Running Android? : TmoNews - Unofficial T-Mobile Blog - News, Videos, Articles and more
Yelp speeds database access with flash storage
Thanks a million, Drupal
OS upgrades: Cheap is better than pricey, free is better than cheap
Amazon vs. Google vs. Windows Azure: Cloud computing speed showdown
The rise of security-as-a-service in Australia