CeBIT 2010: Google renews Net Neutrality call
- 25 May, 2010 09:45
- Comments 2
The issue of Network Neutrality on the National Broadband Network (NBN) has raised its head again with Google Australia arguing that regulation or legislation was required to foster innovation on the NBN.
Speaking at CeBIT Australia 2010, Alan Noble, engineering director, at Google Australia and New Zealand said Net Neutrality was "tremendously important" and needed both public debate and commitment from the Federal Government.
"Our views are that the network - Internet - needs to be open - open access, devices of your choice, services of your choice... and there probably hasn't been enough discussion about the Net Neutrality issues in Australia yet," he said.
"Discussion has been about the physical infrastructure. I think it would be very unfortunate if we saw a situation develop where it was hard for innovation to flourish because the network was not neutral. If innovators had to seek the permission of the network operator to innovate, that would be a very sad day for Australia."
Dr David Skellern, CEO at National ICT Australia (NICTA) played down the Net Neutrality issue, warning of potential delays in the roll out of the NBN.
"A Layer 2 infrastructure is much more likely to be neutral, and we talk far too much about [Net Neutrality]. Various people have given it a lot of thought, and a lot of the discussion about these sorts of issues will ultimately - if we push them too far - lead to delays," he said.
"That doesn't mean we don't discuss them, but you can start to overplay the importance of the network itself. What we need to focus on is how we use it."
Dr Warren Harch, deputy chief defence scientist at the Defence Science and Technology Organisation (DSTO) added that the issue had received attention at various stages within Government, but that a "default position" of Neutral had to be accepted.
"Except that we haven't made that statement," Google's Noble rebutted. "In the US, the Government has come out and said it should be neutral. We have arrived at that conclusion from a regulatory or legislative standpoint here? No we have not."
NICTA's Skellern added that while statements should be made by the Federal Government on Net Neutrality, insisting on it now could lead to a 'bottleneck' in the NBN's roll out.
"I'm quite concerned that the way this has been approached from many quarters is that it is just going to lead to a slowdown," he said. "It will be the bottleneck to us getting the [NBN] out there."
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
- Automating Your Processes to Outperform Your Competition
- Top Reasons to Implement an SOA Governance Strategy: A List for IT Executives
- Improving Productivity in the Connected Enterprise Through Collaboration
- IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Managed Print Services 2011 Hardcopy Vendor Analysis
- Best practices for a Data Warehouse on Oracle Database 11g
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
NBN build gaining momentum daily: Quigley
-
Office 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Dummies®
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Office 2007 for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Computers for Seniors for Dummies, 2nd Edition
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
Microsoft Office









Comments
gnome
Google may have their own agenda on this, but there's also no question that Net Neutrality is very much in the interests of Net end-users.
It seems there may be a little confusion in some quarters about some of the details of the L2/L3 debate.
Iluvatar
Net neutrality is very much a US-centric issue. They have been squabbling about it for years because they (the telcos) want to own the pipes and the content as well.
In fact the whole argument in the US is VERY self serving, the loudest voices are those who stand to gain the most (strangely) from net neutrality i.e. Google feels hard done by because they are at loggerheads with the infrastructure owners ... so they bitch and scream about "net-neutrality". It is complete hipocrisy !
Post new comment