AFACT applauds LimeWire ruling

Popular P2P service suffers heavy blow after US court rules it induced copyright infringements
LimeWire has been dealt a hefty blow after being found guilty of inducing copyright infringements

LimeWire has been dealt a hefty blow after being found guilty of inducing copyright infringements

The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) has welcomed a US Federal Court ruling that popular peer-to-peer file sharing service, LimeWire and its operators, are liable for inducement of copyright infringement.

In what is being viewed as a hefty blow to the P2P service, the US court ruled LimeWire and its founder, Mark Gorton, were liable for copyright infringement.

Notably, Judge Kimba Wood of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled Gorton was personally liable for infringements incurring on the LimeWire service and that his failure to mitigate infringements through the deployment of filtering technologies was a sign of inducement.

An AFACT spokesperson said the decision was one of many being made by courts and governments around the world to address the issue of illegal P2P file sharing.

"We have no issue with Bit Torrent as a technology when used legally but it must not be used to deny artists their rights and rob them of revenue they deserve in return for their efforts and creativity," the spokesperson said in a written response. "That is the kind of work we are seeking to protect .”

In a statement, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) said it was happy with the court's ruling.

“LimeWire is one of the largest remaining commercial peer-to-peer services. Unlike other P2P services that negotiated licenses, imposed filters or otherwise chose to discontinue their illegal conduct following the Supreme Court's decision in the Grokster case, LimeWire instead thumbed its nose at the law and creators," RIAA CEO, Mitch Bainwol, said. "The court’s decision is an important milestone in the creative community’s fight to reclaim the Internet as a platform for legitimate commerce. By finding LimeWire's CEO personally liable, in addition to his company, the court has sent a clear signal to those who think they can devise and profit from a piracy scheme that will escape accountability."

AFACT, which represents dozens of film studios and TV broadcasters, has been embroiled in a legal battle with and iiNet, over alleged copyright infringements on the ISP’s network.

In February, AFACT launched an appeal after the judge overseeing its much-publicised copyright case with iiNet, Justice Cowdroy, dismissed the case, following a five-month investigation that uncovered instances of copyright infringements by users of iiNet’s services.

Justice Cowdroy found the ISP did not authorise the acts of its customers, despite acknowledging copyright infringement.

The appeal will now be heard from 2 to 5 August in front of Justices Emmett, Jagot and Nicholas.

Earlier this month, both parties found out they must wait for the verdict on who will foot the bill for their much-publicised legal stoush following an adjournment in the Federal Court of Australia.

Although AFACT waited until the last possible day to lodge its appeal, legal experts had predicted the development. After the initial Federal Court decision, Melbourne University associate professor, David Brennan, said an appeal was likely and interested parties are "probably looking at 2011 or 2012 before a final judicial determination".

Both parties have suffered considerable financial expense to date in pursing the case and AFACT was ordered to pay iiNet's costs to the tune of $4 million.

In the LimeWire case, the RIAA is expected to now seek damages that could total in the tens of the millions.

Read the judge's full ruling. LimeWire did not respond to requests for comment by time of publication.

More about: ACT, Brennan, etwork, Grokster, iiNet, Recording Industry Association of America
References show all

Comments

1

Daniel

Tue 18/05/2010 - 09:10

On that basis, we can hold the governement to account for all the illegal activity that occurs on or traverses via our national road systems.

Hey! The government built the roads. They invite us to use the roads. So the government must be responsible for everything that occurs on those roads.

The U.S justice system is a joke!

2

gnome

Tue 18/05/2010 - 13:08

It's amusing that the content corporations often claim the effect of file sharing is to deprive artists, authors and performers of income.

It seems that most of the proceeds from content sales by the corporations is retained by the corporations, with the content creators in many cases getting only a pittance for their work.

Perhaps somebody should start representing the creators against those who grab so much of the value created?

3

Anonymous

Tue 18/05/2010 - 15:45

gnome, there is already people representing content creators, they are called agents.

The fact that corporations retain so much of the revenues has never been a justification for people to take something without paying.

Never.

AFACT may be a monumental pain, but they will only get bigger and stronger the longer people try and justify taking and using content without the license holders permission. That includes so many bloggers, who continually convince the corporations to give AFACT and other groups so much funding to mount ever bigger campaigns.

A big thanks to all those wiseacres who think taunting these corps helps the cause at all... Now AFACT will NEVER go away...

4

Max T

Tue 18/05/2010 - 16:24

AFACT and the US courts can go to hell, for all I care.

I will NOT pay for online music or movies under any circumstances. But I MAY buy the retail product IF I like what I see online.

This mob are simply greed-driven. MORE courts need to find AGAINST bludging parasites like AFACT et al.

Sod the lot of 'em!!!

GO LIMEWIRE!!!!!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the Computerworld comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: AFACT, AFACT v iiNet, copyright, iinet, LimeWire, P2P
Whitepapers
All whitepapers
Sign up now to get free exclusive access to reports, research and invitation only events.
Featured Download

Computerworld newsletter

Join the most dedicated community for IT managers, leaders and professionals in Australia