Leaked ACTA draft treaty reveals plans for Net clampdown
- 20 February, 2010 05:33
- Comments 10
The U.S., Europe and other countries are secretly drawing up rules designed to crack down on copyright abuse on the Internet, in part by making ISPs liable for illegal content, according to a copy of part of the confidential draft agreement that was seen by the IDG News Service.
It is the latest in a series of leaks from the anticounterfeiting trade agreement (ACTA) talks that have been going on for the past two years. Other leaks over the past three months have consisted of confidential internal memos about the negotiations between European lawmakers.
The chapter on the Internet from the draft treaty was shown to the IDG News Service by a source close to people directly involved in the talks, who asked to remain anonymous. Although it was drawn up last October, it is the most recent negotiating text available, according to the source.
It proposes making ISPs (Internet service providers) liable under civil law for the content their subscribers upload or download using their networks.
To avoid being sued by a record company or Hollywood studio for illegally distributing copyright-protected content, the ISP would have to prove that it took action to prevent the copyright abuse, according to the text, and in a footnote gives an example of the sort of policy ISPs would need to adopt to avoid being sued by content owners:
"An example of such a policy is providing for the termination in appropriate circumstances of subscriptions and accounts in the service provider's system or network of repeat offenders," the text states.
Terminating someone's subscription is the graduated response enacted in France last year that sparked widespread controversy. The French law is dubbed the "Three Strikes" law because French ISPs must give repeat file sharers two warnings before cutting off their connection.
Other countries in Europe are considering similar legal measures to crack down on illegal file-sharing. However, E.U.-wide laws waive ISPs' liability for the content of messages and files distributed over their networks.
European Commission officials involved in negotiating ACTA on behalf of the E.U. insist that the text being discussed doesn't contradict existing E.U. laws.
"There is flexibility in the European system. Some countries apply judicial solutions (to the problem of illegal file-sharing), others find technical solutions," said an official on condition he wasn't named.
He said the E.U. doesn't want to make a "three strikes" rule obligatory through the ACTA treaty. "Graduated response is one of many methods of dealing with the problem of illegal file-sharing," he said.
He also admitted that some in the Commission are uncomfortable about the lack of transparency in the ACTA negotiations.
"The fact that the text is not public creates suspicion. We are discussing internally whether the negotiating documents should be released," he said, but added that even if it was agreed in Brussels that the documents should be made public, such a move would require the approval of the E.U.'s 10 ACTA negotiating partners.
The participating countries are the U.S., the E.U., Canada, Mexico, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Singapore, Jordan, Morocco and the United Arab Emirates.
In a separate leak that first appeared on blogs last week, the European Commission updated members of the European Parliament on the most recent face-to-face meeting between the signatory countries, which took place in Mexico at the end of last month.
According to that leak, the Internet chapter of the treaty was discussed, but no changes to the position suggested by the U.S. last fall were agreed.
"The internet chapter was discussed for the first time on the basis of comments provided by most parties to US proposal. The second half of the text (technological protection measures) was not discussed due to lack of time," the memo said, adding:
"Discussions still focus on clarification of different technical concepts, therefore, there was not much progress in terms of common text. The U.S. and the E.U. agreed to make presentations of their own systems at the next round, to clarify issues."
The Commission official refused to comment on the content of the leaked documents.
The next meeting of ACTA negotiators will take place in New Zealand in April.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
NBN build gaining momentum daily: Quigley
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Teach Yourself Visually Windows 7
-
Office 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Windows 7 for Dummies®
-
Microsoft Office
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Office 2007 for Dummies
Comments
Peter
Why if this is in the publics interest are these talks being held in secret?? I think some high up cronies are being persuaded with more than just smiles and kind emails from a powerfull group with only one thing on its agenda. This is not good for anyone anywhere, with of course the exception of those self serving monsters perpetrating it. Bad times for freedom. The terrorists have nothing on these guys.
Blake
Nothing good can come from this. This will screw the consumer in the end, it always does. It is almost anti-competitive.
gnome
Perhaps there have been a lot of high level ski trips and other entertainments and inducements going on.
Who needs to conduct boring talks, except as a cover, when there appears to be such easy and effective corporate access to many of the decision makers?
lol
Doesn't sound true to me, this would pretty much put the internet back in the dark ages and make zero difference to piracy.
While there maybe a lot of braindead politicians involved in something like this they all aren't and it would take a halfwit to think something like this would do anything/
BBS
This will just bring back the old days of BBS systems, with file sharing done secretly and encrypted.
Simon Shaw
Where is democracy? Secret meetings between countries deciding laws for large sections of the world?
Sounds like something run by Dr. Evil rather than a group of democratic countries.
Bob
"Doesn't sound true to me, this would pretty much put the internet back in the dark ages and make zero difference to piracy."
Taking the internet back to the "dark ages", where the *only* way to get new media content was to buy the CD or DVD, is *exactly* what the vested interests want to achieve.
They'd also like to outlaw any possible way to copy content, thus the US DMCA & similar legislation, which makes it an offence to circumvent *any* 'copy protection scheme', even if that scheme is easily bypassed by a three year old and his budgie.
Angus
Cool, so we'll be able to sue people who manufacture: cars, roads, food, guns, pharmaceutical drugs, tobacco products and ropes and companies that provide water and electicity because they can kill people?
No?
But ISPs (and presumably us) will be able to be sued by greedy corporations for copyright infringement, which compared to death is extremely trivial? Good to know our Governments care that much about us.
When do we take to the streets to take back control from the Governments of the world? They have failed us and deserve to suffer as a consequence.
Sven
@6: Indeed. The sort of thing conspiracy theorists would write about -- officially announced. "We are currently conspiring over here, but don't worry, we're doing this in your best interests. It's a secret, though, so you'll have to trust us on this."
Paul
Lets make the electricity provider and the computer hardware manufacturer also responsible. What a stupid idea!
Post new comment