AFACT v iiNet: Landmark decision expected today at Federal Court
- 04 February, 2010 06:00
- Comments 2
In the Federal Court of Australia today one chapter in a 14-month dispute between a Perth-based Internet Service Provider (ISP) and some of the world's biggest media companies is expected to come to a conclusion.
Both parties, the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) and iiNet, have said they will consider appealing to the High Court if they end up on the losing side of the decision to be handed down by Justice Cowdroy today.
Computerworld will be at the Court to report on the final judgment in what has been described as a landmark case for the ICT industry and copyright in Australia.
The ISP is accused of being complicit in the infringement of AFACT's clients' copyrighted material.
The plaintiffs — among them Village Roadshow, Universal Pictures, Warner Bros Entertainment, Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Disney Enterprises, and the Seven Network — claim that iiNet is aware of the problem but has chosen not to take reasonable steps, including enforcing its own terms and conditions, to prevent known unauthorised use of copies of the companies’ films and TV programs by iiNet’s customers.
iiNet has refuted the claims, saying it had passed on AFACT complaints to enforcement authorities.
This week several ISPs told Computerworld they were eagerly awaiting the decision, but their views on the potential ramifications were split.
Webshield managing director Anthony Pillon said the ruling will "ultimately decide" whether an ISP is responsible for instances of copyright infringement on its network. However, iPrimus CEO Ravi Bahati told Computerworld he doubts ISPs will be required to police their networks for copyright infringement or chase down potentially offending customers in the wake of the decision.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
- Advanced Malware Exposed - How advanced malware, zero-day and targeted APT attacks are evading today's network defences
- Enterprise Buyers Guide for Printers
- Best practices for a Data Warehouse on Oracle Database 11g
- Think print, Think security - Plugging the printer security gap
- Becoming a Social Business
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
Coalition NBN better or worse?
-
CeBIT 2012: Will NBN speed up freight delivery times?
-
NBN build gaining momentum daily: Quigley
-
Windows 7 for Dummies®
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Teach Yourself Visually Windows 7
-
Office 2007 for Dummies
-
Computers for Seniors for Dummies, 2nd Edition
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Microsoft Office
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies









Comments
Kevin V Russell
I just heard on the wireless that AFACT have lost the case. Given the facts of the case the court hardly decide no other way.
Trevor Clarke
http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/335041/afact_v_iinet_isp_wins_studios_pay_costs/?fp=16&fpid=1
iiNet wins this round
Post new comment