Broadband trials hold regional ISPs to account
- 19 January, 2010 14:51
- Comments 6
Regional Internet Service Providers will be made more accountable for delivering advertised broadband speeds following a Federal Government test of consumer Internet access.
The three-month national test, confirmed by the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (DBCDE), is being run alongside but separate to the Internet Content Filtering pilot which began last December. It follows consumer complaints received by industry groups that some ISPs had failed to deliver on advertised Internet speeds and had too many connection failures.
But industry experts say it is unfair to “point the gun at ISPs” because there are many technical and competitive factors out of their control such as contention rates that can severely reduce the broadband speeds at a customers’ doorstep.
The national test involves 40 ISPs under the department’s Australian Broadband Guarantee (ABG) program across the country, and used Enex Testlab network hardware.
Internode managing director Simon Hackett said minimum threshold requirements do not exist outside those subsidised under the ABG, but added ISPs are governed by strong legal requirements under the Trade Practices Act to “fully inform consumers who buy something about the limitations in what they are buying”.
“Telstra Wholesale based ADSL services, in particular, are indeed suffering some problems in some geographic areas due to apparent under-investment by Telstra in backhaul - something that in practice Internode (and other users of Telstra Wholesale ports) clearly can't directly influence other than by selling services on their own (uncongested) infrastructure where we can (and obviously where we can, we do that),” Hackett said in an emailed response.
“Those congested Telstra service areas also impact BigPond retail customers equally, meaning that Telstra do tend to ultimately fix them, if only for their own retail customers' sake, with our wholesale services benefiting from the same upgrades automatically.”
ISPs under the ABG are subject to Enex testing of “the average data speed of their services and also their network availability”, according to a DCBDE spokesperson. Providers must “deliver an average of 60 percent of the specified peak speeds for a defined ‘threshold’ service (currently 512/128kbps) at least 75 percent of the time”, and must reach 99 percent network availability over a quarterly period.
The government will use the Enex eMetric boxes for further tests if the trial is deemed a success.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) last year voiced concerns about customers receiving far less broadband speeds than those advertised by providers.
"The ACCC is concerned by companies over-promising and under-delivering the speeds available on mobile and wireless internet, particularly in the context of network upgrades and increasing wireless internet subscriptions," ACCC chairman Graeme Samuel said in a written statement.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
-
A comparison of Telstra's 4G phones
-
Drupal gains ground down under
-
NBN build gaining momentum daily: Quigley
-
Chambers: Networking's changing competitive landscape
-
The NBN, service providers and you... what could go wrong?
-
Teach Yourself Visually Windows 7
-
Windows 7 for Dummies®
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Microsoft Office
-
Computers for Seniors for Dummies, 2nd Edition
-
Office 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies









Comments
Frank
As a matter of course, all ISPs should be made provide a map of there network capacity prior to someone signing with them and making a valued judgement prior to making a commitment. ISPs mightn't like it, but I'm sure consumers would welcome the information.
Michael
Wonder where the 40 regional ISP's mentioned came from? At the last sign up there were about 14 ISP's under the DBCDE banner, only one regional, and ,and they all were supplying satellite except in two cases. This article is dodgy.
Rob Seymour-Broadband Anywhere
Agree with Simon's comments (again) If there was a genuine desire to deliver services to rural / regional areas, companies such as us,Agile and many others would be feverishly doing so. However there seems to be an overwhelming reluctance to invest in home grown companies and infrastructure-instead our govt chooses to further contribute and 'crop up' foreign owned satellite co's. Not sure how long the Australian population will swallow this for. In the meantime, we will have limitd access (backhaul) to services in these areas and further drive the knife into these areas and limit their ability to develop local economies and modern services. Even if there was a dollar for dollar type scenario there could still be many possibilities to build new (and scalable) backhaul services to these areas.
Trevor Clarke
@Michael - Thanks for the comment. The '40' figure was provided directly to us from the Department after we asked the question.
Regards,
Trevor Clarke
Editor
michael
Trevor, your ethics has always been exemplary. I did not wish to slur you in any way and please accept my apologies if I did. DBCDE may wish to explain further.
Paulc101
Are they also testing quality of connections? There are some major congestion issues Australia wide in metropolitan areas.
I'm sick of hearing Telstra spout on about it's "world class" broadband network when it can't even deliver ADSL1 1.5mbit in a reasonable fashion, it's more like a "3rd world class" broadband network if you ask me.
Post new comment