What Gmail hack? China spins news of Google threat
- 19 January, 2010 08:11
- Comments 1
Chinese state media has spun Google's threat to leave China as a purely commercial move, as authorities there apparently work to limit discussion of human rights issues raised by Google.
Google last week said it had been hit by cyberattacks from China largely aimed at accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human right activists, and that the company might close down its China offices partly as a result.
In its announcement, the first of its type from a major U.S. Internet company operating in China, Google said other reasons for its decision included growing attempts to limit free speech online.
But while many Western news reports on Google's move have focused on those politically sensitive statements, few Chinese reports have cited them at all. Most reports that do mention the attack on Gmail have done so without elaborating, leaving out details that could incense Chinese authorities if seen in print.
"Several days after the Google announcement, there seem to be fewer Google-related posts and editorials in China that include across-the-bow shots at Internet censorship," David Bandurski, a researcher at the University of Hong Kong, wrote in a blog post on Sunday.
"This might suggest, although it is difficult to tell, that there have been directives from the propaganda department telling editors to dial it back."
Chinese journalists and news editors can face punishment by authorities for publishing articles on sensitive political topics. They are also sometimes ordered not to write on sensitive issues or to post only official newswire stories on them.
China's state-run media has largely dismissed the political concerns raised in Google's statement. An op-ed in the official newspaper China Daily slammed Google's motto of "do no evil" as hypocritical and suggested the company may be using it as a cover to exit the country for business reasons.
A report on Google's move by Xinhua, the state news agency, said it was "inappropriate to play up the issue, or turn it into a political one."
The Xinhua piece mentioned the cyberattacks on Google but did not name Gmail or human rights activists as their target. It called cyberattacks common and said it was "far-fetched" to blame China for them, though Google has not done so.
A Google spokeswoman said the company's motivation for its announcement was not financial. "While our revenues from China are really immaterial, we just had our best ever quarter," the spokeswoman said in an e-mail.
"That revenue, incidentally, is primarily from the export sector -- in other words Chinese companies advertising internationally on Google."
Reports about Google on privately run Chinese news sites have also said little about limits on free speech or the alleged cyberattacks on rights activists. Authorities may have ordered news portals to play down the rights issues, but the portals could also be censoring themselves, said Jeremy Goldkorn, founder of the blog Danwei.org.
Google became one of the most discussed topics on local portal Sina's microblog service within hours of the U.S. company's announcement last week, but Sina quickly deleted it from the list, said Goldkorn.
"The portals and Chinese Web sites themselves, they're huge on self-censorship," said Golkdkorn. "People know this is a sensitive thing."
China's foreign ministry last week responded to Google's move by saying the Chinese Internet was open and that foreign Internet companies were welcome to do business in China according to the law.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
- Government Communications 2.0
- Optimised Data Protection for VMware® Environments with Symantec NetBackup™ Appliances
- Cost Effective Security and Compliance with Oracle Database 11g Release 2
- The Case for Real-Time Networking
- Optimizing Data Quality in the Enterprise - How to Tackle Your Bad Information
-
A comparison of Telstra's 4G phones
-
Drupal gains ground down under
-
NBN build gaining momentum daily: Quigley
-
Chambers: Networking's changing competitive landscape
-
The NBN, service providers and you... what could go wrong?
-
Excel 2003 Formulas
-
Baldur's Gate Dark Alliance
-
Objects, Abstraction, Data Structures and Design
-
Monitoring Exchange Server 2007 with System Center Operations Manager
-
Introducing AutoCAD 2009 and AutoCAD LT 2009
-
Asheron's Call 2
-
Wrox's ASP.NET 2.0 Visual Web Developer 2005 Express Edition Starter Kit
-
Silverlight 4 Problem - Design - Solution
-
Pictures From Brueghel









Comments
raysimlee
Oh computer world start talking human right now. For long West has treated Chines as sub-human there for has less right than the whites.
Google publish raciest picture of US first lady and claimed freedom of speech.
Google infringed on intellectual property right of many Chinese writers in China. These writers took Google to court. Google apologized. Rejected by writers for not sincere. This happened just before Google's public claim of censor, cyber attack etc.
Now human right fighters at computer world decided to join the war against third world humans. 'Human right' has been misused by white and westerners as a weapon to attack other culture, religion and human.
Google is angry with China for the rejection of its apology. Google violated the right of a group of writers (they are human too). Google lost face in China. Google's ego is hurt. For Google a group of sub-human and developing country dare to refuse the apology of one of the richest man in USA. Furthermore its true face of money grabbing exposed.
Google must do something to regain its damaged reputation if not in China at least in the west where anti-Chinese lies and fabrication abound.
Free-speech is an excuse to lie-to insult-to fabricate-to degrade-negative spins by western cultures. The aim is to form public opinion against China. The west did it to the Arabs resulting extreme brutality using western superior death technology. Now free speech freaks want the same done to the Chinese. After all there simply are way too many of Chinese in the world.
Post new comment