The Intenet filter, Human Services and probably Telstra
- 18 December, 2009 08:03
- Comments 8
Smells a little bit doesn't it? A bit off. A bit pungent. A bit too strategic. And that's being nice.
This week, as the kiddies headed off on school holidays and the Christmas silly season really got into the swing, the Federal Government decided it was time to announce its intentions to go ahead with the controversial ISP-level Internet content filter.
If you haven't been watching the online backlash and furious debate that has ensued then take a look at any news or forum site at the commentary — it's fascinating and rightfully passionate. (Here's just one example.)
The ISP-level Internet content filter story has been running for some time and the decision as to whether to go ahead with the much-maligned plan has been heavily anticipated. Especially since it was known the Federal Government, and in particular Communications Minister, Senator Stephen Conroy, had received a report conducted by Enex Testlabs on a trial of the filter by nine ISPs.
So why wait? Well, Conroy is a very busy man and the government has had several other important issues to attend to, not least an Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) and the Copenhagen conference on climate change.
But the cynic in me says that's not it. The delay and timing of the filter announcement in my book has been cunningly coordinated.
Wait till many are already heading off on holidays, if not physically then at least mentally.
Wait till the world's attention and that of a lot of the mainstream press is focused on the gathering of global leaders in Copenhagen for the United Nations COP 15 on climate change.
Wait until a day before the Department of Human Services announces a major reform project, including the merge of Medicare and Centrelink’s IT platforms.
And right before an announcement on Telstra's future as far as its involvement and relationship to the National Broadband Network (NBN) is due.
Then hope it gets buried and fades into the background.
So far, the filter has continued to be front of mind and in my view it should stay there while the debate continues. There are far too many questions around the scope of the plan and its technical feasibility, particularly with the potential introduction of the NBN and the greater speeds and throughput that will entail.
The question now is: Will the expected Telstra announcement drown out the discourse?
It is, after all, likely to be one of the biggest announcements in Australian telecommunications and business history and deserves our full attention whether you agree with whatever transpires or not.
Not that I blame Conroy; I would have done the same thing in his place. Aside from not announcing anything at all, what better way to try and bury what could potentially be the noose that hangs his political career then by waiting until just before a massive announcement on the future of Telstra and the NBN?
Being as doggedly aggressive as he is, it was always unlikely Conroy would ditch the filter plan and you have to acknowledge his gumption for continuing down this path.
But that doesn't mean the decision — whether intentional or otherwise — to announce the go-ahead just before the holiday season and the Telstra / NBN situation doesn't stink.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
-
Customer service still dogs Telstra
-
Customer service still dogs Telstra
-
Customer service still dogs Telstra
-
Foxtel subscriber base grows
-
Obama's H-1B answer in forum may haunt him
-
Windows 7 for Dummies®
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Computers for Seniors for Dummies, 2nd Edition
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Office 2007 for Dummies
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Teach Yourself Visually Windows 7
-
Microsoft Office












Comments
Anonymous
There is a link missing in the article:
"— it's fascinating and rightfully passionate. ([[artnid:330087|Here's just one example)].)".
trevor_clarke@idg.com.au
Thanks - the link should be fixed now.
Regards
Anonymous
Nope. Still broken.
trevor_clarke@idg.com.au
Just checked it and it works. Perhaps try emptying your cache.
Cheers
censored
Just as to be expected by Comrades Rudd & Conroy. & where is Rudd? Hiding in Europe.
Duke
Acknowledge his gumption? Pfttt...
Happily acknowledge his deceitful, ACL and Fielding pandering, technically incompetent, right wing shop steward head kicking, brain dead ethos. Oh, and his ongoing goalpost changing definition of the content his ridiculous filter will ban. Oh and the $$$ his filter vending mates will score. Oh and the childish abuse of opponents as supporters of child abuse. Oh and his dismissal of the hundreds of expert opinions telling him he is a fool.
But gumption? Nup. A schoolyard bully don't have that.
From 40 year ALP voting veteran, who just went Green...
paleoflatus
Democracy has become a sham, since the Westminster system became corrupted by lobbyists, so argument is futile. Debates about internet file-sharing, digital rights, child porn etc. are useless, unless there's a huge groundswell of public opinion (voters).
I've copied good quality music from the radio for over 50 years without any problem. Nowadays, it's easy to surf with encrypted packets via an onion router and encrypted P2P is a piece of cake.
If I were a pederast, I'd find mailing a few DVDs of child porn much faster than Australia's internet, anyway.
WhoNeedsIntertubes
Time for the Internet Service Providers in Australia to Man UP and show us what you're *really* made of, like the bus drivers.
Declare an Internet Blackout Day in protest against the government mandated secret censorship plan.
ONE DAY people, JUST ONE DAY, to protect your freedoms.
Surely its worth it?
Post new comment