Telstra separation decision to wait at least 60 days

Government's push to split Telstra's wholesale and retail arms will have to wait until the Senate sits again in 2010

The Federal Government's push to split Telstra's wholesale and retail arms will have to wait until the Senate sits again next year, after the lengthy debate over the emissions trading scheme (ETS).

Communications Minister, Senator Stephen Conroy, has said he wanted the legislation passed by the end of the year but with the ETS and Liberal party shake up overshadowing the rest of the agenda, he will have to wait until February 2 when both houses of parliament resume.

The news provides some relief to Telstra CEO, David Thodey, who along with several key shareholders wanted to delay the bill and opposed the separation outright.

(View the slideshow of Telstra's Top 10 Greatest Hits).

The Government's moves are seen as key to much of its National Broadband Network (article words) plan, with NBN Co negotiating with Telstra over its network assets.

Despite the often vehement opposition of Telstra and its shareholders over the move, others, particularly rival telco players, have suggested the separation is a necessary evil to improve competition in the industry.

Some telco analysts have also said the future of a separated Telstra (ASX:TLS) is rosy,, one even suggesting it is the deal of the decade.

Regardless of which side you take, the decision on Telstra's future will have to wait for at least another 60 days. And that's a long time in both politics and business.

Sign up for Computerworld's newsletters.

Got a tip on Telstra?Email Computerworld or follow @computerworldau on Twitter and let us know your thoughts.

More about: etwork, Telstra
References show all

Comments

1

Anonymous

Fri 27/11/2009 - 11:38

If Conroy thought Telstra shareholders would take it to the chin, he was badly mistaken. First round to us. Now we succeeded in delaying the bill, the next step is to defeat it once and for all. Here we have a government that wants to have a samblance of competition at the expense of one group of people. We want competition because we are customers too, but lack of competition is not Telstra's fault despite what its competitors are saying. If Telstra's price is too expensive, why they don't build their own and bring on the real facilities based competition to us? Because they want easy, risk-free profits. Until government repels this parasitic competition model, we won't get real competition anytime soon.

2

Assumpt

Sun 29/11/2009 - 18:20

What like the so called real competition that we were suppose to have the last 5-10 years, yeah right lol, move along.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the Computerworld comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: National Broadband Network (NBN), Senator Stephen Conroy, Telstra
Whitepapers
All whitepapers
Sign up now to get free exclusive access to reports, research and invitation only events.
Featured Download
/downloads/product/14/gimp/

GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP)

When you think Open Source software, you may think of half-baked programs too hard to use, or perhaps lacking power. Well, think again. This Open ...

Computerworld newsletter

Join the most dedicated community for IT managers, leaders and professionals in Australia