Open source no panacea for e-health

Leading CIO says open source should not be seen as a panacea for addressing the interoperability challenges in healthcare

Open source software could provide a model for better e-health collaboration, but should not be seen as a panacea for addressing the interoperability challenges in healthcare, according to a leading healthcare industry CIO.

Malcolm Thatcher, CIO of Queensland-based Mater Hospital, said there are two issues to consider around the need for interoperability amongst Australian healthcare providers.

One issue is the National E-Health Transition Authority’s (NEHTA) work towards interoperability standards, and the other issue is around interoperability capacity within the Australian healthcare system.

While NEHTA has developed an e-health interoperability framework, Thatcher says it’s not that easy.

“We’ve got a long way to go there because it’s not [as simple as] a regulatory body like NEHTA coming out and saying ‘these are the standards,’” he said.


See related feature: Prescription for e-health

Although admitting that if NEHTA adopted an open source model healthcare providers could benefit from its agility, Thatcher said the problem in Australia is that there is a greater variability between the types of healthcare providers and their IT systems.

“One of the biggest challenges for Australia’s ability to share health records is the fact that we don’t have electronic health records (EHR) to share,” he said.

“As a nation I think we have to fully address our capacity to manage and share health information.

“If NEHTA was to use an open source model to go down the path of delivering certain building blocks to enable the sharing of health information, then that would I think give some agility to some health care providers to say ‘ok, well we can leverage that open source approach."

Last month, NEHTA released its Strategic Plan to 2012, outlining how the agency intends to drive e-health development and the migration to an EHR service.

Thatcher's comments come on the back of those made by University of Sydney e-health academic Professor Jon Patrick, who previously told Computerworld the Federal Government and healthcare industry bodies should abandon proprietary software and embrace open source if Australia is to have a successful national e-health platform.

Sign up for Computerworld's newsletters to stay up to date.

Got more on this story?Email Computerworld or follow @computerworldau on Twitter and let us know.

More about: University of Sydney, University of Sydney
References show all

Comments

1

Treebeard

Tue 24/11/2009 - 10:42

The question is not whether open source will be a panacea for e-health.

The question is "is open source the best development and licencing methodology for developing inter-operable and successful e-health systems."

And the answer is a very obvious "Yes".

2

Anonymous

Tue 01/12/2009 - 14:56

Open source does not address any of the issues around interoperability. Nor does open source guarantee mature, user friendly applications. Open source could have a place in interconnection: for instance the CONNECT project in US.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the Computerworld comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: e-health, Mater Hospital, open source
Whitepapers
All whitepapers
Sign up now to get free exclusive access to reports, research and invitation only events.
Featured Download
/downloads/product/205/divx-plus/

DivX Plus

Divx Plus 8 provides you with a Web Player which allows you to watch DivX, AVI and MKV videos in your web brower; you can ...

Computerworld newsletter

Join the most dedicated community for IT managers, leaders and professionals in Australia