Telstra: NBN good, separation bad

Legislation unecessary Telstra says, but if it does proceed then it must have amendments

Telstra has used its appearance at the Senate Standing Committee on telecommunications legislation amendments to reiterate its support for the NBN, and its opposition to the Federal Government’s structural separation bill.

Speaking at the Committeee, Geoff Booth, group managing director, NBN Engagement, said Telstra's support for the Government's NBN vision is not limited to words alone.

He said since the announcement of the Government's NBN vision, Telstra had set up an NBN Engagement Group – which Booth heads - and had undertaken extensive internal work utilising resources across the organisation to evaluate potential options for Telstra's involvement in the NBN.

It had also been engaging in active and constructive discussions with the Government and NBNco about options for Telstra's involvement in the NBN.

Booth said Telstra’s objective from these discussions was to find an outcome that was in the interests of Telstra's shareholders, customers and staff and which realised the Government's vision for the NBN.

“Telstra has made it clear that proposals for involvement in the NBN would only be considered if the board and management of the company were convinced they were in the best interests of Telstra shareholders,” he said. “Telstra will continue to talk with the Government, but we cannot agree to proposals that fail to give fair value to our shareholders.”

Booth reiterated that Telstra strongly believed the way to realise a mutually acceptable outcome on the NBN was via commercial negotiations, not via legislation, and so opposed the passage of the Bill in its current form.

“If the Government decides to proceed with the Bill, we believe that it is only sensible that the Senate defer debate until after the conclusion of the constructive discussions between Telstra and the Government over the NBN and the completion of the Government's NBN Implementation Study,” he said. “We would also urge that significant amendments are made to the Bill.”

Booth said Telstra believed the legislation currently before the Committee was unnecessary as it would impede the achievement of the NBN vision, reduce competition -- especially in the mobile and media markets, and harm consumers, particularly those in rural and remote Australia.

The legislation would also not necessarily result in industry reform, but provide the ACCC with expanded powers unparalleled in any other industry, and destroy value for the 1.4 million shareholders that purchased Telstra shares from the Government over the past 12 years.

Booth said that if the Senate decides to proceed with the Bill, that it also make significant amendments to the Bill to address Telsra’s concerns over functional or structural separation of Telstra and the proposed exclusion of Telstra from acquiring more wireless spectrum unless it agrees to vertical and horizontal structural separation.

The amendments should also address the legislations requirement for Telstra to sell its HFC and Foxtel assets and proposed changes to the Trade Practices Act.

Sign up for Computerworld newsletters here.

Got a news tip? Email Computerworld or follow @computerworldau on Twitter.

More about: ACCC, Bill, Foxtel, Telstra
References show all

Comments

1

Anonymous

Thu 15/10/2009 - 16:14

Separation of Telstra (wholesale and retail) must go ahead. For too many years Telstra has used their monopoly and anti-competitive practices to prevent IT outsourcing organisations from purchasing services off Telstra where Telstra has had an interest in the prospective business. The separation can not come quick enough

2

Anonymous

Thu 15/10/2009 - 16:36

Why fix a little problem with a big stick?
I have yet to hear a single specific verifiable example of Telstra's vertical integration causing harm to the industry. Comments are always "For too many years", "Everyone Knows", "It's Obvious"...
Telstra say they offer equivilence in service to wholesale and retail, let's make them prove this is true, then there's no need to seperate them.

3

gnome

Thu 15/10/2009 - 18:56

A big monopoly problem usually has to be fixed with a big stick, because monopolies will never willingly give up their monopoly power and can always think of a hundred reasons why they should be allowed to keep it.

Telstra has caused many examples of harm to the industry, but the brunt of the incumbent's actions has had more effect on the 22 million people who have had to put up with poor standards and service while paying excessive charges.

It may not be a coincidence that Telstra seems to have often been the most profitable telco in the world in recent years, and that's certainly not due to their superior efficiency or service. Needless to say, those easy profits have come out of the pockets of everyone in this country.

4

Anonymous

Fri 16/10/2009 - 14:27

I'm sick of listening to the bleatings of the lets carve up Telstra mob ! Wake up bozos, with far, far, less than 20 million possible, Telco customers in Australia, covering the same geographic area as the USA, and all of whom ..DEMAND, their slice of 1st world standard telecommunications, but don't ever want to pay the real, price required for it, you need to realise, that no matter how much you would like it to be so, there are no Telco faries living at the bottom of the garden. A market this size ..DEMANDS a monopoly player to service it efficiently. The ONLY thing the 'cream-skimming', foreign owned, Telco parasites, are interested in, is shipping ..YOUR MONEY, home to their overseas head offices as fast as they can, and with the least effective competition to that plan, as they can possibly arrange, through lobbying our damn politicians. If you want to vent your spleens at anyone then aim your anger at the damn Government for selling off our previously Nationally owned carrier in the first place in return for their momentary, hands-full of silver, conned out of Australia's mums and dads. Now that they have killed the goose that previously laid ..OUR, National, golden eggs, they are now scheming up just how they can possibly ..STEAL it back again.
A pox upon the bastards....!!!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the Computerworld comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: accc, national broadband network, NBN, NBNco, tesltra
Whitepapers
All whitepapers
Sign up now to get free exclusive access to reports, research and invitation only events.
Featured Download
/downloads/product/165/billings/

Billings

Billings allows you to present clients with professional looking invoices. There are 30 templates to choose from and you can add your own logo and ...

Computerworld newsletter

Join the most dedicated community for IT managers, leaders and professionals in Australia