iPhones in the enterprise leaving IT at wit's end
- 22 May, 2009 02:05
- Comments 6
Executives smitten with iPhones are forcing enterprise IT departments to come up with ways to support the mobile devices even though big security and management questions abound.
Slideshow: Products from Interop
IT pros peppered panelists at a standing-room only Interop session titled "The iPhone and the Enterprise: Is this the Future of IT?" with such questions and left without many answers.
One healthcare IT pro said supporting iPhones would be a nightmare given industry data protection regulations and the ability of end users to relatively easily "jailbreak" their iPhones. Another IT pro pointed out that supporting a bunch of native apps on iPhones would seem to run counter to other IT trends, such as the move toward desktop virtualization and centralized applications control.
Panelist J.T. Starzecki, president of application development and consulting company iPhone Zen Masters, acknowledged that IT pros are left with the "dilemma of how to fit iPhones into their current infrastructure" in light of executives adopting iPhones for personal use and then calling on IT to support them in the business.
"IPhone 2.0 made some leaps toward enterprise adoption [with support for Exchange ActiveSync, etc, but it's not where it should be," he said.
One big challenge in supporting iPhones is that it's hard to find an organization that wouldn't also have a handful of other mobile device types to support, said Adam Blum, CEO of Rhomobile, which makes a framework for building native mobile device apps that can work across platforms. Supporting multiple platforms would only add to an IT department's workload, he said. "We'll always have heterogeneity," he said.
While IT shops might not be happy about losing control over end devices stuffed with applications, Blum said there's not much they can do about the shift. He noted that some applications, such as GPS and cameras, must be on the end device. He pointed to the emergence of applications on iPhones and other smartphones in the enterprise as part of the seemingly never-ending back and forth nature of centralized and decentralized computing.
While some IT shops might being feeling forced to support iPhones because of top execs' desires, others might be the supporters themselves. In these cases, the panelists recommended selling higher ups on iPhone support by showing first how it could benefit customers. "The wedge is 'We want to support our customers,'" Starzecki said.
The panelists pointed to some high profile iPhone business apps, such as AAA enabling customers to report their location via the iPhone and Nationwide allowing insurance clients with iPhones to send in claims data, including accident photos.
Among inhibitors to iPhones taking off in the enterprise is the lack of a good iTunes-like distribution channel for enterprise apps, Blum said. He said enterprise app developers can't abide by a system that wouldn't allow them to have more control over when their offerings become available. "This is an area that's ripe for innovation," he said.
Irv Shapiro, CEO of hosted voice application and platform company Ifbyphone, said it will be interesting to see what enterprises truly require from Apple in terms of iPhone security, whether it's the ability to just sandbox applications or more. "Apple should be listening more," he said.
Though he also said it's quite possible that Apple's focus is more on non-enterprise businesses since there are so many of them. "It could be that Apple is deciding to become the dominant player in non-enterprise workers first and then slowly evolve into the enterprise as demand moves that way," he said.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
- 2-Layer BPM: Oracle's Unique Strategy Towards Exceptional Agility and Business Process Efficiencies
- Increasing Uptime and Efficiency with Switched PDUs - Two ways to use rack PDUs for more than just distributing power
- 10 Things Your Next Firewall Must Do
- A buyer’s guide to application lifecycle management (ALM) solutions
- Server and Storage Optimization Techniques
- iPhone 5 rumour rollup for the week ending February 10
- 3D mapping revives underwater city
- Academic challenges Turnbull over NBN satellite criticism
- What are you saying: Telstra’s customer service slowly improving, SA minister urging Facebook to overturn its photo ban
- In pictures: Capgemini opens new Canberra office
-
Windows Event Viewer phishing scam remains active
-
NeuroSky MindWave: Fun with Brainwaves
-
20 popular Ubuntu Linux apps you may want to try
-
Nokia N9: Why you shouldn't buy this device
-
Microsoft at a loss over Event Viewer scam
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
Office 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Office 2007 for Dummies
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Windows 7 for Dummies®
-
Teach Yourself Visually Windows 7
-
Microsoft Office












Comments
Anonymous
Or ...
Or it could be that after years of IT stonewalling Apple computers, Apple has decided to go directly to users and bypass IT.
There are so many times in my organization that I see the old dichotomy: IT sees its mission as protecting
- the computer from the user
rather than
- the user from the computer
Anonymous
totally agree
Anonymous
holding back the tide
Seems like just another iteration of intransigent anti mac prejudice....
Over the years I've battled a number of IT managers' flimsy and often irational excuses for resisting macs...
It usually comes down to control... if they didn't think of it or build it themselves out of bootlaces and chewing gum then it can't be any good.
Perhaps they fear that a product that is reliable, easy to us, requires little or no maintenance, enhances the user experience and increases productivity might reduce their employment prospects.
Like blacksmiths resisting the rise of the automobile...
Embrace it, adapt and grow fellas... or resist and perish
Anonymous
IT brought it upon themselves ...
I work in IT, I've been there for over a decade in various support, engineering and management roles. Central IT has brought these problems onto themselves over the years by only thinking about things that are good for them rather than their users.
Guess who pays your salary IT guys. Guess who sets your budget. The executives. If the executives want to use some particular device (especially in the case of the iPhone that is a tidal wave of popularity), you'd better find a way of supporting them.
What? You're Windows & IE only web applications don't work? I guess you really should have listened to those "bottom feeders" years ago who told you that vendor lock-in was a bad idea.
clawanhex
Maybe...
It's not so much that IT are anti-Mac prejudiced or closed to new ideas (although I suspect that may be part of it), but that they're scared of losing their jobs.
For example, in the Isle of Man (Irish Sea, UK), their 35 primary schools use ~4,400 Macs. They have a technical staff of two.
IT are scared stiff that if they get iPhones, they'll become redundant.
Link: http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=388557
Mars
IT Whine'rs... - Security?
Security is not the issue. Not wanting iPhones/iPod Touch support has absolutely nothing to do with Security.
I can think of much better reasons from past experience...
Crusty, unimaginative, stick-in-the-mud, intelligent-but-stubborn, IT seniority.
Most "young" IT are open minded, technology agnostic, electronics loving folk excited by new technologies and a challenge to put smiles on users faces.
Security is encryption and IT Patrol to make sure the right people get in and out. Jailbroke iPhones are not magic wands rendering encryption security obsolete.
I'm dumbfounded, is ComputerWorld the new Weekly World News for IT now?
Post new comment