Analyst: Optus' Internet filter participation shocking and disappointing
- 22 April, 2009 16:04
- Comments 36
A leading telco analyst has expressed surprise and disappointment at Optus’ decision to join the Federal Government’s controversial Internet filtering trial.
In a release, Senator Stephen Conroy announced Optus will join the Federal Government’s much-criticised Internet filtering trial despite the withdrawal last month of another ISP, iiNet, and the leaking of the Government’s blacklist to Wikileaks.
Buddecomm telco analyst and director, Paul Budde, told ARN Optus could anger its customers by participating in the trial.
“I thought the credibility of the whole situation was now so low that very few companies would actually put their weight behind it,” Budde said. “It is clear the customers of companies such as Optus will not be amused about this sort of activity. So in that respect I am a bit surprised that companies do stick their neck out in a situation like that.”
The national clean feed Internet scheme, is part of the Government's $128 million Plan for Cyber Safety. It will impose national content filtering for all Internet connections and will block Web pages detailed in a blacklist operated by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA).
Supporters of the trial have called for critics to wait and see the results of the trial before dismissing it and claimed it could help in the fight against child pornography.
However, Budde questioned the Government’s openness on the controversial issue and labelled the whole process “unacceptable” for a democratic society. The analyst also shrugged off the possibility Optus’ involvement changes the balance of the game to give the Federal Government’s plans more legitimacy.
“’Obviously, from that point of view, Conroy immediately sent out a press release,” he said. “But Optus is not going to vote for the Government. The people that are affected by it will vote for or against. In the end that is what counts and I am pretty sure the Minister is well aware of the implications. He is well aware he is not popular with this. I can’t see that Optus’ participation, therefore, gives more credibility to the project. It might give a little more credibility to Conroy but not to the project.”
Optus joins seven other ISPs in participating in the filtering - Primus Telecommunications, Highway 1, Nelson Bay Online, Netforce, OMNIconnect, TECH 2U and Webshield.
Despite iiNet’s withdrawal, the other ISPs have remained supportive of the initiative.
The Government release states that for the purposes of the pilot, Optus will filter the Australian Communications and Media Authority's (ACMA) existing blacklist of prohibited and potentially prohibited content for a selection of its customers who volunteer to participate.
Check out ARN’s slideshow on the content filtering debate here.
Have your say on this contentious issue on our forums.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
- Six tips for choosing a unified threat management (UTM) solution
- Justifying Business Intelligence Applications
- Selecting an Application Lifecycle Management Vendor: An Ovum Report
- Closing the print security gap - The market landscape for print security
- How to Choose an SMB - Unified Communications as a Service (UCAAS) Solution
-
A comparison of Telstra's 4G phones
-
Drupal gains ground down under
-
NBN build gaining momentum daily: Quigley
-
Chambers: Networking's changing competitive landscape
-
The NBN, service providers and you... what could go wrong?
-
Teach Yourself Visually Windows 7
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Office 2007 for Dummies
-
Office 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Dummies®
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
Microsoft Office
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies









Comments
Bob
Will make things worse
The whole pedophilia/internet thing is misguided at best. If child pornography is removed from the net, then the number of pedophiles who act on their instincts will increase. Pornography for pedophiles is a good thing. The making of the pornography is obviously evil, but it now exists. And seeing as though our society is exceptionally ignorant on the whole subject (pedophilia is just another sexuality), prohibition is not the answer.
Optus will lose this little black duck as a customer.
Ray Smillie
Big Mistake
Its a pity our beloved King Krudd has no understanding of the Internet.
I total support his aims and goals but the Internet is not as simple as a single source of contaminated data. It is a web connection not a single wire, it has information coming in from millions of diverse sources.
I am a IT expert, I have been active with the Internet since 1975, while it is impossible to filter the Internet it is quite easy to mount Internet attacks on any server that gives any safe haven to these monsters. You must fight like with like, they use the net we should close there hosting servers down or jam the severs with constant barrage of incoming traffic, this will work, but will annoy many foreign governments
providing evil people with porn dose not keep the innocent safe, it feeds their evil, building up appetites for more and more evil... Personal I would bring back burning at the stake for them, but I am biased
Anonymous
not likely
To say paedophilia is just "another form of sexuality" does not legitimise it any more than "rape is just another form of sexuality". Both are quite simply wrong and anti-social which deserve no encouragement.
Admittedly the filtering will not help as it can never keep up with the illicit industry, will block content which is perfectly legal, is not open for review, and it will again advertise the worst sites in the world when the list is eventually leaked again (for use by everyone that does not live in Australia, or Australians using a proxy server).
As to Optus losing customers - my guess is Optus will not want these "little black ducks" for customers anyway. They should be more worried about people leaving as they have restricted access to legal content.
Anonymous
You have the wrong end of this I'm afraid...
While I am opposed to the filter, I cannot agree with your comments that paedophiles should be catered for, or the statement that as it is already out there we should just let it be. Children were harmed in making that porn, and children will continue to be harmed by those who will make more paedo porn. It would be like suggesting that necrophiliacs should be catered for...who would you like them to kill?
BUT the filter as proposed will not stop child porn / criminals / terrorists. Most of this material is hidden in P2P networks and chat rooms. Neither of which the filter can stop. The filter as proposed will sweep up many other legitimate websites, and the process will be secret with no process of oversight.
The filter has been thought up by people who view the internet as a static place, where each website address is akin to "house". The logic is that we can create a list of "bad houses, where the bad guys live" and thus block the gate. But it ignores that the bad guys can move "house" at the click of a mouse. It ignores that the bad guys can meet eachother on the street and worst of all it ignores that the bad guys can "walk down the road" to where our kids play.
So we will have a secret system of censorship, which will do little to fix the problems of chat room grooming, fraud, identity theft, bullying, and the majority of "bad things" that happen online.
This is what people should be focusing on, and not get distracted by the "think of the children" rhetoric. Where is the cybersafety in shutting our eyes?
Anonymous
bad mve optus
I'm currently looking for an ISP. Given Optus takes part in this Internet censorship (or as I like to call it an attack on our freedom), I will NOT even consider them for my ISP! In fact tomorrow I'm going to look for a new Mobile phone provider.
Remember to old adage of divide and conquer... this has nothing to do with child porn. By supporting this trial, Optus is opposed to your freedom.
Douglas
Slow, uhh!
No wonder Optus is so slow now - or is this just an excuse for their already being slow on ADSL2+ ???
Optus Customer
F Conroy! I will be leaving Optus and so will many other users!
This internet filtering program is a disgrace. The last bastion of free speech is about to be
The people behind this want to push this country back into the stone age. Why, because people like Stephen Fielding from Family First (a Mormon - Family First are Mormons under guise) are asserting their ancient beliefs upon the rest of us.
KEEP YOUR OUTDATED RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OUT OF PARLIAMENT!
I have seen the blacklist and only under half the links are child porn related. The rest are gambling sites, political sites and even softcore porn sites and porn tube sites.
The professional bull crap artist Stephen Conroy said in an ABC interview that the government will only be "blacklisting sites that can't be rated". What a crock. I'm certain those sites can be rated, but they just want to control what we think.
Conroy claims that they are mearly bringing internet censorship in line with current censorship in Australia media today. Hey genius, how about you bringing current censorship into the 21 century you antediluvian minded twits.
Wake up people, this has absolutely nothing to do with child pornography. It's about ridding a nation of critical thinkers and blending us all into the mindless machine like lambs.
"If the Freedom of Speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter - George Washington"
Conroy, get back in the closet you law dodging criminal. Yes, Mr Conroy dodged Victorian surrogacy laws by going interstate when he and his wife Paula Benson wanted a child. Double standards.
Back in the day, we would take ropes to parliament and have ourselves an old fashion hanging.
This government makes me sick.
Optus can shove their internet service. I will be moving to another ISP and using proxies to access what I need.
"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation." - Adolf Hitler.
Where they burn books, they eventually burn humans!
What's next Stephen Conroy, the thought police? E-FU you Nazi!
Angry Optus Customers
Boycott Optus!!
The only way to make a stance and show our disapproval is to Boycott Optus!!
Conroy is a mongrel!
Nick off!
Pedophiles lurk in kids chat rooms. What are you going to do, ban the entire internet? This ban everything mentality has to stop!
Screw yourselves Nazis!
Anonymous
Web Filter
Conroy was asked, how will the Gov decide what is termed Inappropriate, reply was,in responce to complaints.
The UK as well as Aust, MEDICO'S have been on record for complaining about the "Internet" for allowing people to "self diagnose" and that it should be left to Drs to diagnose & Treat".
No one has discussed if Powerful bodys like the AMA that might pressure Conroy to BAN MEDICAL sites.
This would be under the "excuse" that Aust people are harming themselves by self treating...
People are using the Web to check up on private Dr's as well as Drs working in the Public hospitals, exposing errors ...
MEDICAL SITES MIGHT BE NEXT.
Anonymous
Disgrace
This REALLY annoys me. Optus you are a disgrace for participating in this. I to am looking around for a new internet provider and will be crossing Optus off my list
Anonymous
for the NBN?
This is just to gain favor with the government so Optus can get a bigger slice of the NBN.
Cencorship is evil!
I believe you.
They want
I believe you.
They want complete control over what we see and how we think.
Bob
Just because I said it is a form of sexuality, doesn't mean that I condone the actions of pedophiles that act out their desires.
I, my self, would have no hesitation in executing a human being who has been found guilty of molesting someone. As I know what molestation can do to someone. But we need to be rational at all times. Eg. we are all potential murderers, that doesn't mean that we should all be not allowed to own knives or hammers or guns.
It is just that our society has the same reaction you have. Head in the sand about those people who are born, or just are pedophiles. And I assume you think I am too because I stand up for my fellow human beings. We had the same ideas about homosexuality not that long ago.
Simon
For the love of GOD! Why wont someone think of the Childeren!!
Anonymous
yep. thats how I see it.
I agree. This is a cynical move by Optus to curry favour with the minister so that they get a bigger slice of the NBN.
Cencorship is evil!
Optus is a sellout - Boycott them!
Any idiot can see that this isn't about child pornogrphy.
I have been surfing the net for 10+ years and have NEVER come across child porn in all my years.
I'm a father of two and switch adult filters on for my eldest 4+ year old when he is playing and learning online. He isn't old enough for chat sites but I'm certainly mindful of the lurkers in that inhabit them.
The ban list includes gore sites, gambling sites, political sites, medical advice sites, youtube links, myspace links and mild to hard adult porn sites to name just a few as the list will certainly grow once approved.
All of these should be left to viewer discretion and tastes - which seem to be doing just fine up to this day.
I'm sure ISPs like OPTUS are receiving $$ monetary incentive for participating in filter trials. But what is to be expected by an ISP owned by a Singapore company Singtel which is quite akin to extreme censorship on people - and would happily take money in the pocket over people's freedoms.
Keep the penalties tough for pedophiles, close down their servers and certainly block pedophilia sites. To combat pedophilia we must also give more money to our Aus Federal Police - for they have proven methods for catching this scum.
BUT don't punish the rest of us by starting a ban frenzy of anything adult related or contrary and disagreeable to irrational and out of date morals of this last century government. That is something the Australian people do not deserve.
Anonymous
I second everything said here, other than leaving Optus as an ISP because I am not with them, or ever would be thanks to this.
Anonymous
Agreed the suck up is sooo.. obvious
Anonymous
New Police System Needed
The Media controls what we here about the world, but the internet gives free speech. This is just another attempt to control the internet.
Traditional media (newpapers, classifieds,books, etc) is falling apart and the internet is going to send them bust.
Shame on Optus, this will do more harm than good for your company. The filter will expand, I would bet money on it. Who determines whats "appropiate"? I not talking about Child Porn....that's illegal.
I will never opt for a internet filter. As far as I'm concerned it's the parents responsibilty to control what is being viewed on the internet not taxpayers. It's also up to the AFP or State Police to control Child Porn and other related offences. Use the 128 million to setup an internet crimes taskforce....money much better spent.
The problem is that different countries have varying laws in regards to the internet and it becomes hard to police crimes committed in another country via the internet. Therefore the internet should be seen as a individual entity and policed by an International Police Force with laws designed for the internet. The Military has it's own laws why not the internet.
You could stamp out Internet Fraud, Child Porn, Hackers, Harmful Virus Makers etc quite quickly. They couldn't hide prosecution in countries like Russia as they do now.
The international community would pay into a fund that finances this "Global Internet Police".
Problem Fixed! No more viruses, internet child porn, credit card fraud etc.
Anonymous
Kudos, Hit the nail on the head.
Your absolutley correct.
Get rid of short site politicians who cant even research a portfolio.
They cant even police basic plagerism and copyright at present!
Everything you say has great merit.
Anonymous
bye bye optus
just got off the phone to optus and have cancelled my adsl service with them cant believe im saying this but telstra is looking a lot better than optus at the moment. I'll be signing with another isp as soon as ive finished having a search on whirlpool.
The quotes from Washington and Hitler are perfectly appropriate!
skythra
Most pedophile imagry is not on websites
Its mostly passed through IRC, P2P clients, and email rings.
Well at least those who start it take it there, and then after its distribuited it moves on through the rest of the internet.
banning websites will stop the final resting place of these images, it will never stop the people taking them.
Oh and unless they ban all proxies to overseas locations (which would cripple university proxies which collaborate) then you can bypass it just by proxying to america and going to whatever website.
~GOOD LUCK WITH THE FILTER~
Anonymous
InternetFiltering = ThoughtControl ......!
Controlling what adults see and read ie, censorship, is purely about their, thought control, and only done for the benefit of those doing, the censorship. I agree, that children need to be protected from the worst to be found on the internet, which means, that if the government is fair dinkum, about this, being the actual, reason, to introduce their internet filtering, then they should have absolutely, no objection, to making it an "opt-in scheme" where, individual parents can elect to join up to it, for the benefit of their kids protection. In 1939, the NAZIs burned "unapproved" books, in their efforts to control what the German people thought, as can be seen on the following link.
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/ww2-pix/book-burn.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/bookburn.htm&h=438&w=585&sz=70&tbnid=Tqzf9bo0ZQtPZM::&tbnh=101&tbnw=135&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dburning%2Bbooks&hl=en&usg=__YwQ7xEetAEULlKx1o3SCl5iT5So=&ei=h_LvSdqCOM2SkAXV78X4Cg&sa=X&oi=image_result&resnum=4&ct=image
Funny, how the rest of the "Allied" world, universally, decried their actions "then", as being totally abhorrent to "Democratic" thinking ....! I wonder what's changed so radically in the meantime, to inspire Mr Conroy's current actions ....????
Some famous quotes from history, come to mind.
1. "I may not agree with what you say, but I shall defend even unto death, your absolute right, to say it"
2. "They who forget, the lessons of history, are doomed to repeat them"
3. "Goodnight and Good Luck" ....!
Anonymous
Um... the web was developed in the late 80's...
were you a US government contractor? Pentagon Official?
Anonymous
Leaving Optus
I'm cancelling my optus mobile account. There is no way I'm supporting a company that is against free speech.
Daniel
Optus
You all know the old saying, Money talks and Bullshit walks. So start walking people...
Ray Smillie
The net
Try and google the history of the Internet, you will be supprised
The development of the Internet began in 1957, Not 1980s
and we are the Smart country - oh boy maybe we do have the government we deserve..
As an expert I still assert filtering is impossible
even a child could get past any filtering system
unless the are severely intellectually disadvantaged
and I totally support the Idea of censoring the Internet
Mark G
*Damn* it. I've been using Optus for 10 years & never had a single problem. But they've just given a huge boost to what amounts to the biggest and most underhanded attack on free speech in Australia's history.
So long, Optus. I'm actually sad about this. In many ways they are a very good company.
Anonymous
Typically Singaporean
Just remember Optus is the Australian sales and marketing arm of Singtel and Singaporeans see nothing wrong with government controls over free speech etc.
Their target market is also not technology literate people - more the plug and play mums and dads crowd.
But yes it is a blatant suck up - probably won't work because despite their numerous faults the Australian government is not really interested in having the Singaporeans having a large say in Australian communications infrastructure.
Anonymous
BEHIND THE IRON CURTAIN:)
THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH KIDDIE PORN, It's all about thought control full stop ... Political dissent, alternative cancer cures, the truth about HIV, fluoridation of water, codex alimentarius, etc... wake up ! Start saving webpage content of line about important issues - before the books get burned!:)
D.Newman
Its the method of use, not what the filter is allegded to do thats the matter of contention...Kiddie porn is the scare tactic,Like any good insurence sales pitch.
As a point to prove to you, go onto the internet and try and find child porn.
I bet you $100 dollars you wont find some, unless you are a member of a ring with access to their file share, which is passworded and hidden.
Very rarely this filth leechs onto the net, and when it does it isnt there long, you are being suckered into something that is not all that it appears to be, or at the very least has agenda,s that will change or be abused.
And to top all that off the whole thing is somewhat flawed, as even the Chinese found out, if they cant get filtering system to work what hope has the Government who has proven to be somewhat naive about how the internet works, as most filters are bypassed very great ease, and any child will learn the skill off other children within months and you will be blissfully unaware and thinking your children are safe as you have placed all your trust into a government body.
Be a responable parent and moniter your own children, never allow a government to do this, to much blame is directed away from parents as it is, take ownership and deal with it yourself.
So in response to your over cliched and flambouyant headline, I would say all of us are thinking of the welfare of our children, to be responable and understand the freedom of speech, to fight government censorship of ideas and in themselves to grow and learn and understand for themselves and with a parents guidance what is right and wrong...No government SHOULD have to tell anyone what is right and wrong, common sense should do that and good parenting.
Anonymouse
It is interesting to revisit these comments and pick out a few quotes for posterity:
1. "pedophilia is just another sexuality"
2. " If child pornography is removed from the net, then the number of pedophiles who act on their instincts will increase."
3. "providing evil people with porn dose not keep the innocent safe, it feeds their evil, building up appetites for more and more evil..."
4. "Children were harmed in making that porn, and children will continue to be harmed by those who will make more paedo porn."
5. " this has nothing to do with child porn. By supporting this trial, Optus is opposed to your freedom."
6. "No wonder Optus is so slow now" (comment made prior to the trial even starting lol)
7. "The people behind this want to push this country back into the stone age"
8. "Wake up people, this has absolutely nothing to do with child pornography. It's about ridding a nation of critical thinkers and blending us all into the mindless machine like lambs."
9. "Where they burn books, they eventually burn humans!"
10. "Screw yourselves Nazis!"
11. "As an expert I still assert filtering is impossible even a child could get past any filtering system unless the are severely intellectually disadvantaged"
Anonymous
Yes, Anonymouse 13:18, and it's even more interesting to see you in action quoting an unrelated string of out-of-context selective selections from other posts.
Seems the big government/big religion unholy secret censorship union gets ten points for creativity but zero for factual relevance to the issue of secret government censorship.
Perhaps a few other out-of-context quotes, selected this time from the Rabbit Proof Filter brigade, would be even funnier, as most of them have little idea about how "the internets" actually works?
Harry
Isn't this just another example of censorship such as described by Mr Justice Kirby recently when he said it was another Berlin wall.
It could well be argued that it is also emblematic of :
* The burning of Martin Luther's German translation of the Bible in Catholic-dominated parts of Germany in 1624.
* Or the burning of Books by the NAZI regime on May 10 1933.
This move sets a very dangerous precedent and one may well ask where it will end?
The annals of history are full of such good intentions which have gone wrong with dire consequences.
It must not be allowed to happen here!
Could the Children Overboard incident have been censored?
roughe
The filtering has already started and i have heard its not only blocking web pages but affecting p2p as thats something they denied blocking when they were asked. many optus users are finding the internet slow and there new plans are misleading of making the promise of 20 meg and many users are not getting anywhere near the speeds and p2p is blocked too as users are not able to download anymore from p2p. its been said that optus are blocking ports and this is affecting other protocols too.
Post new comment