ISPs show support for Internet filter trial
- 24 March, 2009 10:24
- Comments 3
The remaining ISPs participating in the Federal Government’s Internet filtering trial have declared their continuing support for the controversial scheme.
This week iiNet announced it has withdrawn from the Internet filtering trial with managing director, Michael Malone, describing the trial as a waste of taxpayers’ money.
In a statement Malone claimed the reason the ISP was willing to participate in the trial was to demonstrate the policy was fundamentally flawed.
He also cited drawn out negotiations with the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (DBCDE), changes in policy, mistakes on the leaked internet “blacklist” and corporate social responsibility as factors in iiNet’s withdrawal.
The Internet filter scheme had already suffered a blow last week, with the leak of the supposed ACMA blacklist, the backbone of the internet filter trials, on Wikileaks. A torrent of criticism has been directed at the published list, which contained a handful of legitimate websites such as Betfair.
Participating ISPs, Highway 1, Primus Telecommunications, OMNIConnect and Tech 2U all told ARN they would continue with the Internet filtering trial.
Webshield managing director, Anthony Pillion, said it will still push ahead with the filtering trial and cast doubt on iiNet’s suggestion the DBCDE was inefficient.
“I can’t say that we have had any issues with our discussion with the DBCDE in any way,” he said.
Highway 1 general manager, Nicholas Powers, said iiNet pulling out of the trail has no effect on his company’s stance.
“We are a participant in the filter trials,” he said. “We are just fulfilling our obligations in terms of our contract with the Government.”
The sixth ISP, Netforce, was unavailable for comment at the time of publication.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
- iPhone 5 rumour rollup for the week ending February 10
- 3D mapping revives underwater city
- Academic challenges Turnbull over NBN satellite criticism
- What are you saying: Telstra’s customer service slowly improving, SA minister urging Facebook to overturn its photo ban
- In pictures: Capgemini opens new Canberra office
-
Maingear's six-core laptop has 1.8TB of SSD storage
-
After Megaupload shuts, BTJunkie follows
-
Windows Event Viewer phishing scam remains active
-
NeuroSky MindWave: Fun with Brainwaves
-
20 popular Ubuntu Linux apps you may want to try
-
Office 2007 for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Microsoft Office
-
Teach Yourself Visually Windows 7
-
Windows 7 for Dummies®
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Office 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Computers for Seniors for Dummies, 2nd Edition
Comments
Anonymous
Anything that contributes to the failure of this ill-starred scheme is a good thing.
gfrend
They would say that, wouldn't they
Not surprising that a few small ISPs have not felt able to risk their arm with this govt. They might quickly find themselves added to the secret blacklist!
More seriously, it would be a miracle if filter enthusiast Anthony Pillion was not aligned with Senator Conjob. Pillion's company Webshield is promoted as - you guessed it - being able to filter the Internet, so perhaps there may be just a tinge of vested interest involved.
Charlie
CENSORSHIP IS TYRANNY!!! And that is no exaggeration.
Alot of legitimate sites have been banned, sites like prisonplanet.tv/com and infowars.com, that focus on unveiling issues such as censorship and the suspension of civil liberties, much like what is plauging America as our world draws closer to depression.
Stephen Conroy is naively supporting an inclination towards facist police-state politicts.
Post new comment