Debate IT: Are open source acquisitions by big vendors good for consumers?

Do proprietary vendors have the right nous and company culture to nurture open source acquisitions?

Michael "Monty" Widenius, the original developer of the open-source MySQL database, has left Sun Microsystems and is starting his own company, Monty Program Ab, he said in a blog post on Thursday.

According to Monty, the main reason for leaving was that he was not satisfied with the way the MySQL server has been developed. “In particular I would have like (sic) to see the server development to be moved to a true open development environment that would encourage outside participation and without any need of differentiation on the source code. Sun has been considering opening up the server development, but the pace has been too slow.”

Monty also took issue with Sun releasing MySQL 5.1 as "generally available" last December, despite it being riddled with serious bugs.

So, this brings forward an interesting conundrum. Do proprietary vendors have the right nous and company culture to nurture open source acquisitions? Do they help foster or hinder such development, once such a company – like MySQL -- has been acquired? Do consumers benefit or suffer when serious money, and control, is thrown into the equation?

Tell us what you think...

References show all

Comments

1

SebH

Fri 06/02/2009 - 15:27

Those big corporate guys just don't get it yet.

They think they can take an open source project and then run it like one of their own internal projects.

That can't work.

People get involved with open source because it gives hundreds of frustrated engineers the chance to do what's right, rather than what's needed to ship right now. It's a really bad short term strategy, but in the long term, we have happier coders, better code and less bugs.

In cases like this we just get the worst of both worlds though.

What's even more amazing to me is that this is happening to Sun. They get it more than the others. Imagine what would have happened if it had been one of the other being IT companies!

2

william_nguyen@idg.com.au

Fri 06/02/2009 - 15:35

ah Sun...
while your efforts

ah Sun...

while your efforts are appreciated, theres just something wrong with the software you deliver.

i mean it might work, but its just a little lop-sided.

3

naomih

Fri 06/02/2009 - 16:08

Sun behind a cloud...

The light's no longer shining at sun...

4

Duncan

Fri 06/02/2009 - 17:56

I wonder if Monty is considering a fork?

If he can open up the development of MySQL then I'd be all for that. I think there are a few developers that use MySQL who would be more comfortable with that as well.

Having said that I don't think it is that bad. Sun have been progressing in open source for some time - Java, Solaris etc. They've also been open to reviewing their open source policies based on user feedback. Give them time.

5

Wholey fail

Fri 06/02/2009 - 20:27

Monty's off to join Python?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the Computerworld comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: debate it
Whitepapers
All whitepapers
Sign up now to get free exclusive access to reports, research and invitation only events.
Featured Download
/downloads/product/150/handbrake/

HandBrake

HandBrake is an opensource tool that allows you to backup your DVDs so that you can store and watch them on your computer. Features include: ...

Computerworld newsletter

Join the most dedicated community for IT managers, leaders and professionals in Australia