Computerworld

Internet industry backs iiNet in copyright fight

Movie industry has “allegations, not evidence”.
Tags | iinet | legal | P2P
Internode's Simon Hackett ultimately wants to see around 50% of Internode customers using naked DSL
Internode's Simon Hackett ultimately wants to see around 50% of Internode customers using naked DSL

The Australian Internet industry has supported iiNet in its defence against legal action filed by the leading US media giants and the Seven Network, which experts say could force providers to police peer-to-peer traffic if the Federal Court rules in favour of the plaintiffs.

The court case, spearheaded by Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) which represents the media corporations, demands that iiNet eliminate the file sharing of copyright media over its network.

iiNet could be forced to ban peer-to-peer traffic over its network or throttle speeds, and issue the “thousands” of customers alleged to be in breach of copyright with infringement warnings.

ISPs aren't policemen
Internode director Simon Hackett
Internet Industry Association (IIA) chief executive Peter Coroneos said copyright enforcement is the responsibility of the plaintiffs and not ISPs.

“The IIA has had a long standing view that intermediaries including ISPs, cannot be liable for the conduct of their users where they have limited knowledge or control over what those users are doing — this is a case in point,” Coroneos said, speaking broadly about ISP copyright enforcement.

“[Copyright enforcers] have unprecedented legal tools at their disposal [following amendments to the Copyright Act in 2005-2006], yet instead of using those tools to go after the people they alleged are infringing, there are calling upon the intermediaries to do their enforcement.

“They should go to the Federal Court, present their case, and seek orders for the ISP to disclose the relevant customer information to them and take action.”

Coroneos said AFACT should pursue the matter in court and not with iiNet because they only have allegations, not evidence. “To ask ISPs to threaten customers and interfere with the Internet experience, and place sanctions would only be appropriate with evidence,” he said.

Internode CEO Stephen Hackett said in an e-mail to iiNet managing director Michael Malone that the company should not be held responsible for policing network traffic.

“The industry remains of the view that ISPs aren't policemen,” Hackett said.

“The content industry should take legal action against end users if it believes they have broken the law. ISPs are like Australia Post: we just deliver it.”

More about: ACT, Australia Post, Creative, IIA, iiNet, Internet Industry Association, Internode, Motion, Motion Picture Association of America, Recording Industry Association of America, Seven Network, VIA
References show all

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the Computerworld comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Recent Discussions
Whitepapers
All whitepapers
tracking pixel
 
Computerworld Community Comments
Zones
SAS Resource Centre

This Resource Centre hosts a wealth of thought leadership articles, whitepapers, and success videos, to help you make the most out of your corporate information in order to swiftly make sound business decisions to survive and thrive in the current economic climate.

Oracle Resource Centre

News, Features and the latest whitepapers on SOA, Application Grid, Enterprise Management and Database

Sponsored Links
 
Back to top Sitemap
Copyright 2009 IDG Communications. ABN 14 001 592 650. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of IDG Communications is prohibited.