Computerworld
NBN bidders agree on fibre monopoly
Network to adopt utility model.
Darren Pauli  31 July, 2008 15:25

The National Broadband Network (NBN) will likely operate in a monopolistic, utility-based model, according to telecommunication providers.

Members from the Terria consortium, industry associations and analysts unanimously agreed the model is the most realistic given Australia's economic and geographic environment.

The speakers divided over the level of regulation required to encourage competition, including fees for network access and whether the NBN operator should be structurally separated.

AAPT chief executive Paul Broad said market pressure will force the NBN operator to structurally split.

"When electricity industries were sold in Victoria, investors forced the separation of the industry because they saw grey yield in infrastructure and growth retail and [similarly] in time, Telstra investors will force the company to separate," Broad said.

"Natural monopolies are the most incompetent, inefficient businesses to run any network you can imagine.

"If I were in Telstra's shoes I would also argue [for a return on capital] but you have to make bold decisions in the marketplace in which you win and lose."

Broad said the NBN operator will have to "bite the bullet" in regards to the risk of investing up to $15 billion in infrastructure, referring to his time as the head of Powertel when it invested $800 million into a Sydney to Melbourne fibre backbone, instead of using Telstra's networks, and subsequently lost some $140 million.

Terria managing director Michael Simmons said NBN access prices must be regulated in areas without competing infrastructure.

"The NBN needs to be a monopoly by definition because of its size and scale. The party that owns and operates the network should be independent from the access seekers so everyone is treated equally," Simmons said.

"Separation of network was occurring naturally with the local loop unbundling.

"Access pricing needs to be regulated outside metropolitan areas where the network can only operate as a monopoly. It may not be needed in metro markets because separation will happen naturally."

Comments

Post new comment

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Enter the fully qualified URL, eg. http://www.example.com/
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Zones
Zone logoZones provide focussed content from Computerworld and leading technology partners.
Newsletter Subscription
Newsletter Subscription
Sign up for our Computerworld newsletters!
Syndicate content
 

Computerworld Webinar

Thursday, June 11th, 2009
10:30am EST (Sydney, Australia)
Screening at your PC

Computerworld is hosting a 30 minute live webinar to help you to learn how unified communications can save you money, foster innovation and business agility by making it easier for people to find, reach and collaborate with one another.

Register Now

Computerworld Community Comments
Whitepaper

Wireless LANs: Is My Enterprise At Risk?

This paper details the risks associated with wireless LANs, and offers an overview of the inherent properties of wireless LANs and differences from wired networks. Read about real-life breaches and incidents and strengthen your own defence.

Enterprise IT Buyer's Guide
Find Technology Vendors Fast
 
Find vendors by name | Find by category
Sponsored Links
 
Send Us E-mail | Privacy Policy
Features List | Media Kit | Advertising | Contact Us

Copyright 2009 IDG Communications. ABN 14 001 592 650. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of IDG Communications is prohibited.