- 1
- 2
- < previous
At its worst the phenomenon can even wipe Internet servers off the map.
Last month, Stephen Gielda, president of Packetderm, upset a fraudster who was trying to use his anonymous Internet service. Soon his servers were inundated with a tidal wave of backscatter messages. At one point, he was being hit by 10,000 bounceback messages per second, enough to throttle the server's Internet connection.
Gielda had to take his site off-line for five days as he waited for the problem to abate. "I'm used to backscatter, but I'd never seen it at this level before," he said.
While backscatter is extremely hard to filter out, it is a problem that can be fixed.
Backscatter comes in three varieties: messages from mail servers, saying that there is no such user available; "out of office" automated reply messages; and so-called challenge-response messages, which tell the sender that his message will be delivered only once he responds to the bounceback and confirms that the e-mail is coming from a legitimate address.
Security experts say that people should simply stop using these last two types of bounceback messages.
As for "no such user" bouncebacks, that can be fixed too. There are a few e-mail standards that could help with the problem: Variable Envelope Return Path (VERP) and Bounce Address Tag Validation (BATV), for example.
But the problem would largely disappear if server administrators configured their mail servers to immediately reject mail that is sent to nonexistent users, rather than accepting it and then bouncing it back to the faked addresses. Some ISPs (Internet service providers), AOL for example, have done this and have largely eliminated their role in the problem.
If there is spam in the backscatter message, antispam software should filter it out, but if a message has an ambiguous subject line, like "Hey" and the spam message stripped out, the backscatter will look like a legitimate bounceback and is probably going to get through, said Dmitry Samosseiko, manager of Sophos Labs Canada.
"This is a serious problem that is hard to deal with, to be honest," he said. "We can blame spammers for causing the issue in the first place, but it exists because of the mail servers that are not configured to deal with spam."
- 1
- 2
- < previous
Read up on the latest ideas and technologies from companies that sell hardware, software and services. Understanding Email Marketing: A Guide for SMBs
Keeping your SQL Server Going 24x7
Providing Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery for Microsoft Cluster Server and Windows Server 08 Failover Clustering Apps
Speeding business innovation with Data Centre Transformation solutions
Reducing the risk of insider abuse
The business justification for data security
Data Center Eco-Nomics
Secure Remote Access
Zones provide focussed content from Computerworld and leading technology partners.
















Comments
protecting yourself from backscatter spam
as in most cases like this, i'd say that prevention is always better then cure.
check this article out about measures you can take to protect yourself from backscatter spam in exchange server 2007.
http://www.allspammedup.com/2009/04/protecting-yourself-and-others-from-...
SpamCop blacklisting domains that send backscatter
My domain recently fell victim to this, but in a different way. Apparently my domain was one of the "legitimate e-mail servers" that was sending the bounce messages, as it was not rejecting incoming messages to non-existing users while the SMTP connection was still open.
I found out about this when I started receiving messages from quite a few different domains that my emails were being blocked due to my domain being listed on SpamCop. Their FAQ suggests that the cause of my listing was my email server sending back the bounce emails.
As for this Steve guy who received the flood of bounce messages, I lost all sympathy for him when he started whining about calling the Feds.. seriously, what are they going to do, write a new BS law?
Post new comment