Here's the scoop on the Windows animated cursor bug
- 03 April, 2007 11:16
- Comments
When a major vulnerability affecting every flavor of Windows -- including Vista -- breaks, it only seems like chaos ensues. Okay, so it is chaos. Witness the so-far short-lived flaw in Windows' animated cursors (ANI), which picked up enough steam over the weekend to power a turbine or two. IT staff, small business users and consumers have been trying to figure out which way is up, and whether this is a Big Deal or just another security industry siren blaring in the background. This FAQ on the flaw, explains what it is, which machines are at risk and what you can do to protect yourself.
What's the problem, anyway? A critical flaw in User32.dll, specifically in the code of that Windows .dll that loads animated cursor (.ani) files, which are used to trick out the cursor, changing it from a simple pointer to a short animation. Microsoft, for example, sometimes includes animated cursors in its optional visual theme downloads. Exploits targeting the bug can use ANI files to run malicious code on a victimized PC, infecting it with spyware, stealing identity information or adding it to a botnet of hijacked systems.
When did this pop up? Microsoft says it was first notified in late December 2006 by researchers at Determina, but others -- including Marc Maiffret of eEye Digital Security -- point out that the vulnerability is very similar to one patched in January 2005 that also affected cursor files. It wasn't until last week -- March 28, to be exact -- that attacks using the exploit were spotted in the wild (by McAfee) and reported to Microsoft's Security Response Center (MSRC).
What versions of Windows are vulnerable? This is the cropper, isn't it? One of the things that makes the ANI bug so dangerous is that it affects every still-supported edition of Windows, including Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2, Server 2003 (up to SP2), and even Vista. Both 32- and 64-bit versions are at risk.
What about Linux or Mac systems? Are they at risk, too? Hahahahahaha. Sorry. Nope.
Are hackers using the vulnerability? Funny. China's Internet Security Response Team (CISRT) warned over the weekend that a worm exploiting ANI was in the wild. Symantec tagged the worm as Fubalca, while other security companies -- no surprise here -- applied different monikers. McAfee, for instance, calls it Fujacks.aa, while Computer Associates labeled it MSA-935423!exploit. Nothing like consistency. Other reports have cited one or more spam runs that include links to malicious sites hosting an ANI exploit, while the newest information from Websense Inc. is that there are at minimum 150 Web sites circulating the attack. So the short answer, unfortunately, is yes.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email Computerworld
- Follow Computerworld on twitter
- Book 1 - The Practical Guide to Assuring Compliance
- Beyond Dropbox: Requirements for Enterprise Secure File Sharing
- A Technical Overview of the Oracle Exadata Database Machine and Exadata Storage Server
- Best practices for implementing 2048-bit SSL
- 2012 Pathways Advanced ICT Leadership Development Program
- iPhone 5 rumour rollup for the week ending February 10
- 3D mapping revives underwater city
- Academic challenges Turnbull over NBN satellite criticism
- What are you saying: Telstra’s customer service slowly improving, SA minister urging Facebook to overturn its photo ban
- In pictures: Capgemini opens new Canberra office
-
Maingear's six-core laptop has 1.8TB of SSD storage
-
After Megaupload shuts, BTJunkie follows
-
Windows Event Viewer phishing scam remains active
-
NeuroSky MindWave: Fun with Brainwaves
-
20 popular Ubuntu Linux apps you may want to try
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Office 2007 for Dummies
-
Computers for Seniors for Dummies, 2nd Edition
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Windows 7 for Dummies®
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
Microsoft Office
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Teach Yourself Visually Windows 7












Comments
Post new comment