War on spam aided by authentication, trademark efforts

The war on spam continues on a number of fronts. In addition to improving spam-detection and spam-blocking technologies, vendors are pursuing authentication and trademark protection of domain names to fight spam.

Authentication, while not an anti-spam tool per se, does determine whether the mail server used by the sender of a message is an approved sender. Although there are a number of good authentication schemes that have been proposed, I feel that Sender ID (the merger of Sender Policy Framework, or SPF, and Microsoft's Caller ID) will ultimately become the leading standard for e-mail authentication, although likely not the only one.

Most recently, Cloudmark and IronPort Systems announced their support for Sender ID. Earlier, ClickZ advised organizations that market through e-mail to obtain an SPF record and FrontBridge Technologies has announced support for SPF and Sender ID. Last month, Microsoft's Hotmail service announced it would begin verifying incoming e-mail for SPF records in the fourth quarter.

Some time back, I proposed using trademark law (as have others) to protect domains from being spoofed, or at least giving domain owners some recourse to prosecute spammers who use a domain name in an unauthorized manner. Because domain spoofing (the practice of using a domain to send spam fraudulently) can be so injurious to the reputation of a domain owner, there should be some way that damaged parties can fight back.

To help establish service mark (the equivalent of a trademark) protection for domain names, the US Institute for Spam and Internet Public Policy (ISIPP) last week announced it has started a service to help business owners register their Internet domains for protection under U.S. trademark law. For a fee of US$225, ISIPP will prepare the application for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, have the application reviewed by an attorney, conduct a conflict search to determine whether or not a domain has already been granted service mark status and electronically file the application. Although the ISIPP service does not include the filing fee of US$335, the service does all the legwork to register the domain.

All of this reflects the continued, broad-based efforts to reduce the amount of spam affecting individuals and enterprises using processes and techniques that will supplement technology-based approaches.

More about: IronPort Systems, Microsoft, Patent and Trademark Office

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the Computerworld comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Whitepapers
All whitepapers
Sign up now to get free exclusive access to reports, research and invitation only events.
Featured Download
/downloads/product/235/softperfect-network-protocol-analyzer/

SoftPerfect Network Protocol Analyzer

Publisher's notes: SoftPerfect Network Protocol Analyzer is an advanced, professional tool for analyzing, debugging, maintaining and monitoring local networks and Internet connections. It captures the ...

Computerworld newsletter

Join the most dedicated community for IT managers, leaders and professionals in Australia